Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bobma -v- Natwest


bobma
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6263 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, another Newbie here, but although I am new here I am quite advanced with my claim. Unfortunately I didn't know about the templates here and so have used my own letters etc.

My claim is for just over £5k.

After reading through a few of the more popular threads, I don't really have any questions, but would like to summarise what I have done to date see if anyone has any comments.

  • Sent 1st letter - not as good as the one here, hence, point blank refusal. (Initially only asking for recent £114 charged on one day)
  • Meeting with personal NatWest advisor - merely wanted me to take out a loan. She actually said the charges are a penalty.
  • 2nd letter with threat of court - again not the one here and another point blank refusal.
  • No S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) as I had all my original statements.
  • Created my own spreadsheet with columns for Statement No., Charge Date, Charge Amount, Charge Description and another for calculating 8% simple interest.
  • MCOL for £5000 application, cost £120
  • Acknowledged on-line by Cobbetts on the very last day.
  • CPR18 and Defence from Cobbetts.
  • I Answered CPR18 in Full with Spreadsheet etc. - would have sent Sod off letter if I had known!!
  • Tranferred to local court cost an extra £100.
  • Offer of 50% from Cobbetts - Refused, said they should now pay compound interest and I added recent charges. Saying unless they paid the now £5276 I would complete the AQ.
  • Recieved their completed AQ (they didn't tick they had paid the fee)
  • My Allocation Questionaire completed - allocated to Small Claims.
  • Court Date 14th Feb 2007.
  • Request from court to send everything I will rely upon to the court and to Cobbetts. - This is when I started to worry and found this site. Bundle to be delivered 14 days before Court date.
  • Have now made a nice bundle with: all correspondence; spreadsheet; Caselaw examples; copies of relevant Acts UTCCR, UCTA and SOGA with my argument as to why Natwest contravene each one in turn (depending upon how they plead).

Looking back I do have a couple of questions....

  • Should I photocopy all of my original statements for the court?
  • Should I have claimed 8% compound interest as it works out at £200 more?
  • Can I continue to claim charges and more interest as time passes, between the original submission and court date?
  • I have 15 statements missing and so didn't assume (or claim) there were charges on these (even though I am sure there would be some).
  • I have claimed all interest they have charged me as most of it is default interest, is that OK or should I have seperated out the normal interest on my authorised overdraft?
  • Why do I get the feeling I will be the one they decide to take all the way???? :eek:
  • In a way I hope they do... after reading all the stuff on this site I have renewed confidence.

Thanks to everyone, and I look forward to being in a position to donate from my windfall which is due sometime before Valentines Day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes to photocopy statements for court bundle. Yes to 8%. No newer charges since you filed at court will be claim 2. may not be a problem. Unlikely they will pay out.

 

Good Luck and Welcome to the CAG family

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nattie, I obviously haven't changed the claim at court, just in the refusal of their offer I said 'full and final settlement would now cost them more because of their prevarication'. (that's when I added the recent charges and changed the interest calculation.

I did this because they said some of my charges occurred more than 6 years ago (Between my first letter and the MCOL some charges fell off the end July 2000 to November 2000).

 

As for the 8%... I notice the excel template here uses simple interest and this was also similar to the formula I used.

=(C9*0.00022)*E9 used by Vampiress and

=(D$1-A9)*8%/365*C9 used by me in my submission

These give the same result but neither take account of interest compounding as it builds up over time - ie it is simple interest.

 

In my letter I changed the formula to give a method that can compound the interest either every day or once per year (or any other period) ie using the Future Value (FV) function within excel.

=FV(8%,(D$1-A9)/365,0,C9,0)*-1-C9 compounds the interest annually.

Or better still....

=FV(8%/365,D$1-A9,0,C9,0)*-1-C9 compounds the interest every day.

 

For a £25 referral Fee on 23rd April 2001 these 3 methods give an interest accumulated of:

simple = £11.53

annual = £13.97

daily = £14.65

 

You can see when added up (and 90% of my charges occurred 3 to 6 years ago) it can make a big difference to the claim (£209 in my case).

 

It's going to be a real pain to photocopy 6 years worth of statements, there are 282 of them. Surely there must be a way round this? Natwest must have access to copies and I don't mind handing the judge the originals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NatWest do but this is your claim and You as claimant need evidence. It is not for them to lay down because the info is available. Remeber you are suing them, hard work will pay up but they will settle prior to it. I do hope you haven;t added additional charges since you started to sue, ie court papers, because unless you amended the claim then the bank have to pay the full amount on the claim not a arbitrary additional since then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks,

 

I will leave the photocopying to the last minute, and will only do it if necessary.

Also, I will obviously accept any offer that at least matches that on the POC, and will not expect them to pay any regard to my offer rejection letter where I asked for more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, :)

On the day I was "expecting" a copy of the material they intend to rely upon for their defence I get a cheque.

Not for the full amount on the MCOL claim but for that and the additional extra couple of hundred I asked for when I turned down their 50% offer. (revised interest calculation and latest recent charges).

 

They have complied with the 'no conditions attached' as I requested in my 50% offer rejection.

 

Interesting to note that the date on the cheque is a week before the date on the letter, suggesting to me that they are lining up everything to pay out and then just playing brinkmanship with the timing.

 

Anyway I'm a happy bunny now. I just need to decide whether to give it back to Natwest to pay off my £5 overdraft and then move my account or get the new kitchen we desparately need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations bobma :)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...