Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HD (budget) v LlTSB : ** WON **


HD
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After getting my DPDR information through, eventually, from Lloyds I am now in a position to start a claim for my other a/c.

 

Thought I'd start a new thread to keep the details seperate.

 

Prelim letter sent 1/5/06 £2,631.00 in unlawful charges.

 

If there are any mods about can they look in my other thread (HD v Lloyds) and answer the query there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

No Aknowledgement of preliminary letter for budget a/c delivered by hand to branch on 2/5/06.

 

Sending LBA and adding paragraph.

 

"I am disapointed that you have not even aknowledged my original letter that was delivered by hand to the reception desk at the branch on the 2nd May. I am giving you a further 14 days to commence a dialogue to resolve this matter. If I have not received a satisfactory response in that time I will have to commence legal action to recover these unlawful charges. As my fiduciary I would expected you to have responded to my communication promptly."

 

Any comments or suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange development.

 

Just got a letter from our friends @ Martineau Johnson-

 

Thank you for your two letters addressed to your local branch and dated 1 May 2006 and 18 May 2006.

 

Please note that any queries or complaints relating to a Lloyds TSB Bank account should be directed to the Bank's Customer Care Department in the first instance. The Customer Care team are in a position to forward queries and complaints to the correct department and the appropriate team will then respond to you in due course

 

The reason that we first joined Lloyds as it then was in the first place was that they offered personal service from your local branch!!

 

Two questions

 

  1. I am presuming that sending my PL and LBA to my local branch was an invitation to them to settle this amicably without recourse to the courts, would this be viewed as such by the courts?
  2. Can I still fill in the Moneyclaim with my local branch named as the defendants?

 

Having binned my voice your concerns leaflet I cannot confirm this, but I think that that actually states that you should raise your initial concerns with your branch. Has anyone got a copy to check?

 

I feel a snotty letter to MJ coming on but I want to check my facts first!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Proposed letter to MJ; I'd be grateful for any comments

 

Dear Sir

 

Thank you for your letter (your ref: XXXXXXXXXXX) which I must admit perplexed me. I would be grateful if you could clarify some points for me.

 

You state that any queries or complaints should be addressed to the Customer Care Department. In the leaflet "How to voice your concerns", which was sent to me by one of the Customer Service Advisors from Lloyds when responding to a previous complaint, it quite clearly states that the first step should be to contact your "regular Lloyds TSB relationship manager". It goes on to state that you should only go on to contact the Customer Care Team if you feel that the complaint has not been satisfactorily resolved. Please could you clarify whether this leaflet is the correct procedure or whether your letter outlines the correct procedure; I don't see how they can both be correct.

 

You then go on to explain that the reason for contacting The Customer Care Team is that they "are in a position to forward queries and complaints to the correct department". Am I to Infer from this that my local branch is not in a position to? If this is the case I find it extremely worrying that I had entrusted them to act as my fiduciary.

 

If my local branch has not taken the correct action in response to my letter I can appreciate that it might have given you insufficient time to engage in meaningful negotiations on this matter. If you wish to engage in such negotiations please contact me and I will extend the deadline for legal action. I have no wish to waste the court's time or public money. If, however, you merely plan to send me a standard letter I see no reason to extend the deadline stated in my Letter Before Action.

 

I trust that will you wish to engage in a meaningful dialogue and save everyone's time and money.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

HD

 

I'm planning on e-mailing this tonight, so any suggestions would be apreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that I don't think your letter will make a blind bit of difference.

 

I think sending your letter to the solicitors simply means that you have been distracted by their letter. If I were you I would just get on with it. Don't waste time.

 

I am a bit surprised that you have received this letter From Martineau. I had imagined that they were a fairly independent firm of solicitors. I now see that they are simply another administrative department of Lloyds.

 

Just get on with it; have the claim served on your local branch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have received a letter from ************* This morning:D :D :D .

 

According to the letter I am not meant to discuss the contents of the letter, but it's the same as many others. My accounts will be looking £6k healthier and there is a BAG donation on its way:D :D .

 

Thanks to everyone for all their support-I couldn't have done it without you all.

 

I will keep coming on to the forums to see if I can help others. When I think of the anguish that the Black Donkey put us through anything I can do to help others who have been under their cosh will be done.

 

Thanks again to everyone and a special thanks to BF, Dave and assorted mods.

 

Over the moon at the moment. We're having a barbie this afternoon; I might make a poster informing everyone that it is sponsored by Lloyds:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

congratulations

 

can you please fill in out survey :D

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

congratulations HD.

the train of thought has left the station, hope i was on the right platform!!

 

____________________________________________________

Lloyds TSB

prelim sent 06/07/06 response rec'd 14/07/06

LBA sent 20/07/06 response rec'd 27/07/06

Moneyclaim filed 22/08/06 Ack'd 30/08/06

Defence filed 26/09/06 AQ filed 12/10/06

hearing set for 10th Jan 2007

 

Cap One

prelim sent 2nd Nov 2006 First offer rec'd 14th Nov

any thoughts, suggestions or advice given by MBQ are done so without prejudice. All information I have, i have learned from this excellent site. If in any doubt, seek professsional advice.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...