Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBOS and Cobbetts HELP PLEASE.


peter534
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6316 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all, since being sucessfull with my own claims, i have been helping my friends and family with theirs. Usually this is straight forward enough, however, i have just been given a letter by my aunt which she has just received off Cobbertts with regards to her claim against the RBOS.

 

Story so far ia as follows:

 

13th October 2006 - Subject Access Request Sent

 

Received statements no problem.

 

27th October 2006 - Preliminary approach letter sent.

 

10th November 2006 - LBA sent.

 

20th November 2006 - Standars Blah Blah response received.

 

29th November 2006, after i had persuaded her that it was the best cause of action, she filed with MCOL.

 

13th December 2006 - RBOS acknowledge the claim and intend to defend.

 

Heres where it gets interesting:

 

This morning we applied for judgement by default, and not an hour later received the post. in it was a letter from cobbetts. It read as follows:

 

Dear Madam,

 

Our Client: The Royal Bank Of Scotland Plc

 

We are instructed on behalf of the above named.

 

We enclose by way of service the Defendant's Defence.

 

We confirm that we have filed a copy of the same with the court. Would you please acknowledge receipt.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Cobbetts LLP

 

Enc

 

 

 

 

IN THE NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO: ***********

BETWEEN

************ **************** CLAIMANT

-AND-

THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC DEFENDANT

DEFENCE

1. The Defence is filed and served without prejudice to the right of the Defendant to apply for a summary judgement in respect of and/or to strike out the particulars of the claim.

2. The Defendant is embarrassed by the lack of particularity pleaded in the particulars of the claim to the extent that the particulars of the claim fail to disclose reasonable grounds for bringing the claim against the defendant. In particular:

2.1 The particulars of claim set out no facts indicating what the claim is about, are incoherent and do not disclose any legally recognisable claim against the defendant.

3. The defendant invites the claimant to remedy the above. In the event that the claimant fails to do so within 14 days of the service if the defence then the defendant will apply to the court for an order striking out the particulars of the claim.

4. The Defendant reserves the right to plead further to the particulars of the claim once and if the claimant properly particularises the same. In the meantime, it is denied that the claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief whether as pleaded or at all.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

The Defendant believes that the facts stated in the defence are true. I am duely authorized by the defendant to sign this statement.

Full Name: Lynsey Claire Burgoyne

Name od defendants solicitors firm: Cobbetts LLP, Ship Canal House, King Street, Manchester M2 4WB (Ref:***********)

Signed

Defendants Solicitor.

Well, we weren't expecting that. I checked later on and our application for judgement by default has been rejected, so they managed to get their defence in in the nick of time.

 

The particulars of the claim were exactly the same as i normally do. Can any one see any problems with this.

The claimant is claiming a refund for all charges imposed on her by The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc since 24th January 2001. The charges total £*,***.**. A breakdown of these charges is available to the court, if required. The reason these bank charges are being claimed back, is due to the claimant becoming aware that the charges that had been applied to her were disproportionate, and therefore, unlawful. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from the date that each individual charge was applied, to 30th November 2006, of £***.** and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £*.**.

Ths text has never been questioned before!

Help, im stuck. Can anybody give me some direction please..

Link to post
Share on other sites

The text has probably never been questioned before as you have probably not dealt with Cobbetts before. Have a look at my thread on Natwest where I am dealing with Cobbetts. Ive had exactly the same, and so have many others, and today on the phone, they admitted that they had everything anyway. This is just one of their standard stalling and intimidation tactics. Dont worry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for the quick response. So you think i should just let it run its course then?

 

Should we be expecting an AQ in the post, or should we indeed be concerned that a judge would infact strike out the particulars of the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I did was to fire back a letter to them enclosing yet ANOTHER copy of the schedule and pointing out that this has already been sent to their client, the court and themselves. Send a copy of the letter to the courts asking them to attach it to your claim, so that the judge is in no doubt that they DO have proper particulars of the claim. The courts are aware that this is just one of their ploys. If you read my thread, you will know what to expect as I am a little in front of you. I will be posting details later today of another letter received this morning which moves on the their next ploy.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...