Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

What Is This Charge


dagrat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6318 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

Could somone help? Ive just gotr all my statements for the last six years and i think i know which charges i can claim back.

But there is a charge i get every month (example below)

 

 

INT TO 23 nov-A/C ******** 35:29

CHG TO 23 nov-A/C ******** 40:00

 

Now i know that i cannott claim the interest, but what is this other charge, and does anyone know if i can claim it back? It ammounts to a very large portion of possible claim.

 

I initially thought it was a maintenance fee but now im not so sure.

 

If anyone could help i would really apprecuiate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi everyone.

Could somone help? Ive just gotr all my statements for the last six years and i think i know which charges i can claim back.

But there is a charge i get every month (example below)

 

 

INT TO 23 nov-A/C ******** 35:29

CHG TO 23 nov-A/C ******** 40:00

 

Now i know that i cannott claim the interest, but what is this other charge, and does anyone know if i can claim it back? It ammounts to a very large portion of possible claim.

 

I initially thought it was a maintenance fee but now im not so sure.

 

If anyone could help i would really apprecuiate it.

 

looks to me like CHG = Charge ... dunno what for (poss returned d/debit cheque over limit etc, etc) The Int is obviously interest & you are able to claim back a portion of this if you've been paying interest on the charges.

 

Is this a bank account? I would have thought £40.00 per month is far too steep for a maintainance charge ... if in doubt the best bet is to ring your bank & ask ... but looks a bit steep to me whatever it is!

 

If/When you decide to claim interest on charges, there are spreadsheets for you to enter on your details which calculate this portion for you. There are some on here & also on varios user signatures for example ... Vampiress has a full set he maintains on google & Mindzai has one for use on bank accounts ... Hope this info helps a little

 

Good Luck :)

links to my current claims ...

My claim - Yorkshire Bank Visa

chezt V RBS Mastercard

Chezt v RBS Joint Account

chezt v Abbey Credit Card

 

Settled ...

chezt V Duet Card/Creation Finance

chezt v's Studio Cards

chezt v's Littlewoods Catalogue

 

Next ...

Abbey Joint a/c & Single a/c

Barclaycard (Mine & Hubby's)

Anyone else I can think of ...! :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying. The two chargs are put on the statement every month at the same time and both vary in ammount. But as i have been permenently o/d can i still laim this back. It looks like a charge for going over the agreed o/d. What do you think

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying. The two chargs are put on the statement every month at the same time and both vary in ammount. But as i have been permenently o/d can i still laim this back. It looks like a charge for going over the agreed o/d. What do you think

 

Yup you can deffo claim it ... the point is that surely it does not cost the bank £40.00 just because you go over your credit limit so they are basically making a profit from this ... therefore the charge is unlawful ... The interest they charge should more than cover their costs.

 

Go for it! :)

links to my current claims ...

My claim - Yorkshire Bank Visa

chezt V RBS Mastercard

Chezt v RBS Joint Account

chezt v Abbey Credit Card

 

Settled ...

chezt V Duet Card/Creation Finance

chezt v's Studio Cards

chezt v's Littlewoods Catalogue

 

Next ...

Abbey Joint a/c & Single a/c

Barclaycard (Mine & Hubby's)

Anyone else I can think of ...! :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks . But if i claim for this and all the others, and it goes to court, if this one part of claim is not allowed would the court then find in favour of the bank, and throw the lot out including all the d/ds and o/d fees etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks . But if i claim for this and all the others, and it goes to court, if this one part of claim is not allowed would the court then find in favour of the bank, and throw the lot out including all the d/ds and o/d fees etc?

 

What do you mean ... 'not allowed'? Do you mean you are not allowed to claim it back?:-?

links to my current claims ...

My claim - Yorkshire Bank Visa

chezt V RBS Mastercard

Chezt v RBS Joint Account

chezt v Abbey Credit Card

 

Settled ...

chezt V Duet Card/Creation Finance

chezt v's Studio Cards

chezt v's Littlewoods Catalogue

 

Next ...

Abbey Joint a/c & Single a/c

Barclaycard (Mine & Hubby's)

Anyone else I can think of ...! :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What i mean if it is found at the court that i should not have claimed for one particular charge, do they then throw out all the other bonafide cgarges with it?

 

No they will just omit the charge they dont agree with. yo uhave 2 threads for the same question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry you guys but I win the prize for knowing that the £40 is unarranged borrowing(or going over the limit) £28 and guess what you have a Royalties Gold account which you pay £12 a month for.

No Bank charges £40 to return an item, highest charge for this is actually Halifax at £39 a pop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry you guys but I win the prize for knowing that the £40 is unarranged borrowing(or going over the limit) £28 and guess what you have a Royalties Gold account which you pay £12 a month for.

No Bank charges £40 to return an item, highest charge for this is actually Halifax at £39 a pop.

 

Thanks for this, youare right. So does this mean i can claim back the £28 portion of the charge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saga continues.

Thanks for your help natweststaffmember Ive taken your advice and entered all the charges LESS th£12 account costs Fine.

 

But after going back into earlier years ave found that the charge varies from 5, 7:50, 25, and thirty pounds. So there are three charges less than the £12 for the account.

 

What do i do? Shall i just enter the full ammount into the spreadsheet and leave it to the bank to worry about it?

 

Please help before i have serious brain malfunction!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling that the £25 is an unlawful charge not linked to the royalties Gold and the £30 as well, when and what year was it debited and the narrative on the statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

The cheapest £5 was back in 2002 and varied inthat year up to 20 and 25. The labelling was always the same as per my earlier post ie:

 

CHG to 22dec A/C******* £5

It is always just under the interest for that month line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every month on the same day ie 21st the charge is applied on next line from interest.

 

I 1st thought it must be a standard charge to account but i cannott see why it varies. I still get all the other charges as well unpaid items, referal charges, card misuse etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That one is a service fee for the royalties account. I will see if I can wake up lively or an alternative is t4ff I think that is the name as he seems to have a good understanding of the charges for RBS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dagrat did you start with a basic or interest paying current account and then upgrade to a royalties account? If so this could be why the charges go from variable (ie. penalties directly related to an unauthorised overdraft amount) to charges which don't vary at £40, which is definately £28 unlawful charge + £12 account fee.

:lol: Sweetrevenge :lol:

Don't get mad - get even!

If I've helped you please hit my scales 'n' bump my rep!

 

RBS (My A/c) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent /10/06, statements rec'd 20/10; Prelim sent 3/11/06, s*d off letter rec'd 20/11; LBA sent 28/11, Settlement offer rec'd 18/12

WON at LBA with compound contractual interest £607

 

RBS BF Account S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 4/11, part response rec'd 28/11, further info sent 3/12 awaiting statements at 20/12, Sent LBA 19/01/07. Received all statements resulting in 3 claims, £1,278, £4,279 and £7,250(!) all with contractual interest.

 

 

This is now very out of date!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bingo!!!!

Yes sweetrevenge your dead right. Ive just looked at my statements and in 2001 iit is a Royalty account and recent years it is a Royaltys gold account.

 

That would explan the difference, but what can i claim back.

The account changed from Royalties to Royalties Gold in aug 2003. When it was just a royalties account the charge varied from aminimum of £5 to £20 and even £25. Do you think that the service charge for the account when it was just royalty was £5 and when it changed to Royalty gold in 2003 the account fee became £12?

 

If this is the case do i claim Charge less £5 for pre 2003

Charge less £12 for post 2003 ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

just checked all statements and this charge is as follows:

 

00-01 all £20 charges except for one £5 charge

01-02 all £25 charges except for one £20 and one £5

02-03 all £25 charges except for two at £5

03-04 all £30 charges except for one £25 and one £7:74 (bizzaro!)

04-05 all between £30, £38 and£40

05-06 all £40

 

ANY IDEAS (going mad)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I created a whole thread on these charges and how to work them out, you can find it here. This should help you calculate these charges. Anything you can't account for, add it to your claim. My claim was settled no arguments using this process.

 

Hope this is of help.

 

__________________

Stuck with RBS charges?

Click here!!

 

Settled

RBS1 £2794

RBS2 £503

Halifax Credit Card £498.14

 

Still to Settle

Barclaycard Est£180

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

just checked all statements and this charge is as follows:

 

00-01 all £20 charges except for one £5 charge

01-02 all £25 charges except for one £20 and one £5

02-03 all £25 charges except for two at £5

03-04 all £30 charges except for one £25 and one £7:74 (bizzaro!)

04-05 all between £30, £38 and£40

05-06 all £40

 

ANY IDEAS (going mad)

 

Thanks T4FF great help particularly the spreadsheet.

But still have problem with this charge. Ifeel sure that the charge as £5 for the royalty account because that was the lowest amount.

 

But when i changed to royalty gold in aug 2003 there were still the odd £5 in with the larger amounts. Also i know that the charge is now £12 for the royalty gold but what was it the other years?

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...