Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, is there anyone here who is in an IVA? I am struggling to find any info on what it is like to be in one from someone actually using one.

 

I have seen a couple of threads that said it was a nightmare to set up but it's my only option apart from bankruptcy I think.

 

I just want to know how hard it is to set up. Who is a recommnended practitioner (that doesn't charge up front fees). Do they leave you with any money after bills at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, why do they need to see my wife's income when it's a single IVA and none of the debts are hers? Can't see how they can use her salary to work out my repayments when it wasn't anything to do with her? Anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask a really rude question that's very relevant? No need to answer either on the forum or even by PM. What are your essential expenses and current debt repayments as a percentage of your household income, and would you say your income is sort of lowish, mediumish or highish?

 

I don't have experience of IVAs first hand - but the things you need to watch out for include there being some kind flexibility in the arrangement to account for unforseen changes in the level of your income or expenses.

 

But more importantly, do you actually have something to gain from entering into an IVA as opposed to going bankrupt?

 

Examples of things to gain I can think of would be (Please don't take the third personally - I'm just including everything I can think of!!!)

 

- You are a chartered accountant or similar and your professional body would expel you (you would still need to check the situation re an IVA in any case)

 

- You have equity in a house or some other type of asset you want to keep that your wife or a third party introduced by yourself couldn't afford to buy from the Official Receiver

 

- You have some reason why you don't want your past financial affairs to be opened to the Official Receiver's scrutiny (Such as gifting assets, being reckless or dishonest in your use of credit and worried that the Official Receiver's enquiries could lead to prosecution (eg for obtaining credit through deception) or a bankruptcy restrictions order (eg for reckless or inappropriate use of credit such as a majority of credit card debt being for gambling)

 

- You are just embarrassed at the thought of your name being in the paper / it seems wrong / I don't like the sound of it / I don't want to have to go up to the court.

 

Unless one of the first three of these apply, is an IVA really the way ahead? (Four isn't a valid reason - if it's four I'm afraid I need to tell you as politely as possible to get over it. 100s of k of people are going bankrupt - it's the way the modern economy is working, and the recent changes to bankruptcy legislation are there to reflect that.)

 

Also, your experience of dealing with creditors and those that act on their behalf may influence whether you feel that you are most likely to be able to negotiate reasonable payments with an IP who is desperate to get hold of every penny he can grasp, or a member of the Official Receiver's staff who is a little more detached and realistic.

 

The Insolvency Service would aim to take around half of the income in excess of essential expenses of someone on a lower income, rising as a %age for someone with a higher income. This might be a guide to consider when making a proposal if bankruptcy is a realistic alternative for you.

 

Both the Official Receiver and an IP would want to know about your wife's income as she may be making a contribution to the household expenses that you are jointly reponsible for and thus reducing your essential expenditure.

 

Edit...

 

I've just seen your earlier post.

 

"Will my job be a problem?"

 

The most likely answer is no, they would only know if they noticed in the paper, and as long as you didn't default on an income payments agreement of refuse to supply payslips to the Official Receiver they would never be contacted. On the other hand, a CCJ an attachment of earnings would give them something grumble about!

 

If you are a chartered accountant, lawyer, or insolvency practitioner, then definitely, it will be a problem. If you are something like a police officer or tax inspector, you should consult your HR department for advice. They will want to see that you have done everything possible to avoid bankruptcy and this would include serious consideration of an IVA if it is possible.

 

Post or PM me if you want specific advice about a particular job.

 

"Will my landlord kick me out?"

 

The likely answer is no.

 

Are you in arrears with your rent? Do you have a 'social' council type landlord

 

If you are in arrears with your rent, a council or social landlord will most likely tell you they will kick you out unless you come to a payment arrangement to clear them. It's naughty of them as it's a bankruptcy debt and you don't have to pay it, but they can get off with it; they don't have to let you stay in their house without paying. As any other private sector rent will likely be higher, so the Official Receiver will take this into account when considering an income payments agreement. If there are arrears, a private landlord will most likely apply the boot.

 

If you have no arrears, a social type landlord has no problems, nor should a private landlord. They wouldn't even necessarily find out. What it would make it difficult for you to do is take out a new contract if you wanted to move house to another private landlord (they'd probably want 6 months rent paid in advance or a guarantor.) This would be a potential problem if you needed to move for work or because the landlord didn't want to rent the house out any more. However, an IVA could well be just as much of a problem in this regard.

 

The Official Receiver would have to see a copy of the tenancy agreement - they would write to the landlord if you didn't have one. Provide it and they don't need to contact them at all :)

 

"Should I wait until we renew the contract with him before I go bankrupt?"

 

Probably doesn't make an awful lot of difference. If you check your agreement that will say whether it is ended by a bankruptcy. Even if it is, few landlords will want to lose a good tenant for this reason. (Of course if you are a pain in the neck, have never paid rent on time, the council keep complaining to them about the raves and the neighbours about the 18 scrap cars in the garden, lets face it, they're going to treat it as an opportunity from above ;) ) Remember to explain to them that bankruptcy actually made you more able to pay your rent, as it reduced your outgoings!!!

 

Please PM me if you have any concerns about bankruptcy you don't want to raise here.

Number of times I've asked 1st Credit for information that I stil haven't recieved... 55 as at 02/05/07 :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. Kellsangels will read your thread later. thank you.

Gingerheid, I was considering bankruptcy first and then searching the net I kept being given messages saying it should be my last resort.

 

I'm not worried about being in the paper. I am worried about losing the flat we rent although I have never missed a rent payment or been complained about and my contract says nothing about bankruptcy. Common sense would say they should keep us as tenants but they may also panic and not renew our contract. It states on the Insolvency site I looked at that landlords WILL be told.

 

I don't have anything to hide in my credit except stupidity. I just thought an IVA may be more honest. At least I would be paying some of my debts back and I understand I will have to do that for 3 years under a bankruptcy anyway. The reason I am behind is we were on one income for nearly a year and I didn't tell my wife about the debts as I was 1) too scared and 2) didn't want to make her any more unwell than she was.

 

I have an appointment now through CCCS next week with a debt counsellor so hopefully I can get a clear picture of my options. Bankruptcy is still one I really need the reassurance of staying in the flat that's all.

 

I was asking about the wife's salary as there is every chance we will be splitting up but potentially living together for a couple of months while things are sorted. I would then either move and leave her here or move a friend in. Everythign is so up in the air at the moment I jsut don't know what will happen.

 

Thanks for all the effort you put into that reply, really appreciated. I will read it again later and try to digest it a it more!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...