Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Documents arrived today dated 27th March.  This is a cc taken out a long time ago (2008) and they don't seem to have been able to provide a copy of a CCA agreement, just reams of print outs of lines of texts from old bank statements, default notices etc.   
    • Documents finally arrived today from PRA group.  New day have sent me lots of paperwork, copies of default letters and statements, print out of what looks like a CCA that would have been completed on online, IP address as signature.  This debt is not too old, so possible this is the true copy of agreement ?  Not sure what my defence would be beyond irresponsible lending. 
    • pers i wouldn't.. all you need to know is in the posts of that thread....that being section 127(3) of the CCA refers. if under a CCA return, the 'creditor' claims its a recon, it must not contain any details like a sig, tickbox, or typed name (whether you signed physically or by online tickbox) 1. those are not necessary in a recon, so why inc them? (faked??) 2, it cant thus be a recon!!, it must be a copy of the 'original' from the original creditor, not from a debt buyers filing cabinet. they shouldn't not be 'mixing' some original docs from the OC with crap from their filing cabinet, claiming its ALL a recon! because some of it is faked. just remember there are far more docs like NOA and a DN that are as equally important to a court claim of 'this debt is enforceable'. never rely solely upon the dodgy agreement argument.
    • India has thousands of small gold refineries which are facing more competition from big players.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Court Costs ?


unicorn96
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If i take RBS to Small Claims Court (for the 2nd time, its a long story !!!) for 2 separate claims, one for £230 and the other for £450 and i LOSE, what would be the maxium i would have to pay in costs to them.

They basically failed to fulfill their promise after i advised the court to cancel the summons as they had agreed to pay. They refuse to pay by cheque and have payed into my accounts to which i no longer have access. I am going to claim again via the courts and leave it in the hands of a judge to decide.

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Demand access to those accounts. Go into your local branch with identification and empty the accounts.

Unfair penalty charges reclaimed from Barclays - £700; BarclayCard - £380 + £132 extra; Style (RBOS) - £245 - County Court Judgement

against RBOS awarded - Judgement transferred to Registers of Scotland - Sheriff Officer (Bailiffs) action taken.

Travel insurance claim with Alpha (URV) pursued through the Financial Ombudsman - £704

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately i cant. I owe money on them and if they put the money into the accounts then it would only go toward paying off what i owe them, thats why i want a cheque. just wanting to know the max i could be charged for costs if i lose. I need a judge to decide if they were being deceitful by not disclosing how they intended to pay me. i always said i wanted a chque even on my summons, but they refuse and have put the money into my accounts instead.

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Call your court and ask them if they could bring your case back to court. Ask them if they can recover the costs from the other side as they have not complied with the court claim properly.

Unfair penalty charges reclaimed from Barclays - £700; BarclayCard - £380 + £132 extra; Style (RBOS) - £245 - County Court Judgement

against RBOS awarded - Judgement transferred to Registers of Scotland - Sheriff Officer (Bailiffs) action taken.

Travel insurance claim with Alpha (URV) pursued through the Financial Ombudsman - £704

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will phone them and see what i can do

Thanks

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoned the court. They said my hearing is due this Thursday and if i want to go ahead with the claim, just to let them know by Wednesday and they will let it go ahead. I will send 1 final e-mail to RBS solicitors tonight telling them this and then if they dont play ball i suppose i will just have to go to court. Really scary. Could pay from about £70-200 in costs depending. Do you think its worth it.

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately worth it.

 

Don't forget: The Bank doesn't want to go to court. Communicate to the bank your demands, tell them that the hearing is going ahead on Thursday.

 

Don't forget: You will get all of your court costs back.

 

Read the library 'Preparing for Court' - Just in case!

Unfair penalty charges reclaimed from Barclays - £700; BarclayCard - £380 + £132 extra; Style (RBOS) - £245 - County Court Judgement

against RBOS awarded - Judgement transferred to Registers of Scotland - Sheriff Officer (Bailiffs) action taken.

Travel insurance claim with Alpha (URV) pursued through the Financial Ombudsman - £704

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unicorn,

 

Maximum amount of expenses in a small claim is £75, so not £200.

 

Couldn't help but notice that you appear to have been paid though, albeit in a manner you did not wish. You appear to be in prime lawyer's territory. If you owe the bank money have you considered the fact that they may raise a counterclaim against you on Thursday?

 

Whether it is worth it might depend on how much you owe on the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks and have done just that. Sent this mail to RBS solicitors.

I am in receipt of your e-mail dated 1st Dec 06 and again i reiterate i asked for settlement to be made by cheque and this has not happened. It was your choice to credit my accounts unasked and i would respectfully suggest you reverse any credit and make payment by the method i outlined in all my correspondence.

As previously advised, should you wish to raise an action with regard to my other accounts, this will be treated as a separate matter and challanged accordingly. If it is not your intention to provide the cheque's originally requested, then my action will continue.

I have today spoken to my solicitor, Leslie Deans & Co in Edinburgh for advice regarding this matter, and he has advised me that i should continue with court proceedings and let a judge decide. I have also spoken to the Aberdeen Sheriff Court this afternoon regarding the Summons, of which the hearing is due this Thursday 7th December 2006 and i have until Wednesday 6th December 06 in the morning, to let them know if i wish to proceed with the hearing. I do not have to start again with a new summons, all i have to do is advise you that i will be going ahead with the proceedings and turn up in court at 10am on the 7th.

I would also advise that i have no intention of being intimidated by your actions and would urge you to provide the funds as promised without further delay. If i do not hear from you to the contrary before 12pm on Wednesday 6th Dec 06, i will advise the court that i will be appearing to continue with my claim.

Will wait and see

x

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Advocate

see my above mail. will just have to see who scares first. have already been trying to sort out payment to RBS M/C but they want more each month than i can afford at the moment. will have to wait and see.

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The sheriff courts are not known for their consistency. Much depends on the sheriff you get. This may go for you, but perhaps not.

 

If you are claming on account X and you owe them money on account X, they have a right to make a counterclaim against you. Depending on the amount you owe, there is a possibility that they could seek to have the case remitted to the ordinary cause roll. There is no limit on the expenses here as there is for the small claims route, although it is always possible to ask to have the other party's expenses "taxed" to ensure that an unsuccessful party is not paying over the top for expensive lawyers used by the Banks.

 

It may be the case that if you owe them money on any account, they could still counterclaim, although I would have to refresh my memory of the rules on this area.

 

You appear determined, I only hope this does not turn out to be a bad experience for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice. Will wait and see what happens with my e-mail. I can always hold this off till after christmas, i dont have to go ahead with the hearing if i dont want to. Would just have to start again with a small claim. I am determined, but scared at the same time. I have a written arrangement with RBS and pay back ..... each month to my accounts that i owe money on.

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...