Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescot Credit Services Ltd and great universal debt


den3371
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All

 

Hello to everyone. I am a new member and stumbled accros this site out of pure luck.

 

Last Saturday I received a letter from the above collection agency saying I owed £364.08.

 

When I called them I found out that this was from 1997 and was at an address that I used to live with my then husband. I have no recollection of the debt but was told they had bought the debt from Great Universal which I did have an account for. I have basically panicked and offered to pay £36 per month over 10 months, and I also explained that I had been made redundant a few weeks ago and that I am a lone parent on income support.

 

This morning I have received a monthly incoming/outgoing statement that they want me to fill in. Do I have to fill this in?

 

I have also been told about the Limitation Act 1980 by a friend who tells me that as this debt is over 6 years old, they can't enforce it - is this correct?

 

I would appreciate any advice!

 

Many thanks

den3371:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You have two options, Either you can ignore them , Or you can send them this, Both ways they can go spin, :)

 

 

WESCOT CREDIT SERVICES

PO BOX 137

DUNEDIN HOUSE

45 PERCY STREET, HULL

HU2 8HF

24 OCTOBER 2006

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No xxxxxxxxx CLIENT REF:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 "an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued."

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that "it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period".

 

The last payment of this debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that "continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statue barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970".

 

I await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

MR xxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be ok with this as long as they have nothing in writing that you've acknowledged the debt. I assume you didn't send them anything in writing after their phone call stating your offer of payments ? your phone call obviously acknowledged the debt but phone calls don't count!

If for any reason you want to pay them then you should only be paying a token payment of £1 per month. As your claiming benefits the government only gives you enough to live on, not pay debts.

Good luck.

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you LondonPam.

 

I haven't written anything to them, but I have made one payment of £36 over the telephone which was last Saturday as I just panicked! Will that count?

 

Many thanks.

den3371:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
Thank you LondonPam.

 

I haven't written anything to them, but I have made one payment of £36 over the telephone which was last Saturday as I just panicked! Will that count?

 

Many thanks.

 

Although the debt was stature barred by paying them money you have now ressercted the debt and acknowledged it.I'll see what I can find out this afternoon and post back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like unfortunately you have now acknowledged the debt. See what the other poster comes up with, maybe there is a way out of it. Even if you do have to pay you should really reduce the amount as I stated. You've come to the right place for advice :)

  • Haha 1

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
Typical! I am such a muppet!

 

Thanks Terminator.

 

First thing: Don't pay them another cent or acknowledge anything in writing.The debt is stature barred under The Limitation Act(1980)

 

The Limitation Act 1980 | Payplan

 

The above link will give you all the info you need.I find it amazing that DCA's are trying to collect debts well outside of the six year limit when really they ought to know better.If anything I would either cancel the payment or ask for the money back.May I also add that if there is no signed agreement which obviously they would have to prove then not even a court can enforce the debt unless it is a CCJ which can then only be enforced by the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much everyone, I'm amazed at how quickly you have all responded. The advice has been so much appreciated.

 

So what do you think I should do? Send the letter that andy8 has suggested and see if they come back with anything? If they do then offer to reduce my payments?

den3371:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably a stinking letter back stating that you have to pay etc but stick to your guns as the others have said they cannot enforce this debt.

If they do reply badly as I predict state it again in writing. If they continue to harass you about the money there is a template on here which will sort that one out.

 

I would also demand the payment you made back or if it was a debit or credit card attempt to get the bank to reclaim it. The bank will probably want a good reason so someone will have to back me up here could it be considered fraudulent? Nothing is owed as the debt is not recognised under UK law could be an angle to go for a refund with?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear all

 

There appears to be alot of conflicting advice on other threads about old debts, yes pay it, no don't acknowledge it, bin the letter etc. I am panicking as I sent a letter stating that I don't owe them the money under 'The limitation Act, even though, I paid £36 when I called them out of sheer fear and panic! I am currently on income support after being made redundant last month. This debt relates to 1997, and I can make no recollection of it all although I did have an account with Great Universal. I have moved a couple of times since then and been in my current property 4 years now.

 

Am I getting worked up over it unnecessarily?

 

Please please could someone let me know what I should do /have done

den3371:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be late in picking up on this thread but remebr the following two points

 

You offered them money on the phone. That doesn't count as an acknowledgement. This HAS to be in writing.

 

Secondly once a debt is time limited, statute barred, limitations act whatever NOTHING will unbar it and start the clock ticking again.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

" Secondly once a debt is time limited, statute barred, limitations act whatever NOTHING will unbar it and start the clock ticking again."

Sorry, Neil, you're wrong. Making a payment resurrects it.

Den, get that payment stopped. Do it first thing Monday, of you haven't done it already.

Best

 

westy

Westy

 

 

 

If you like my post, click the scales!!

 

Nov 1 2006 Preliminary letter

21 Feb 2007 - cheque arrived for charges+DEBIT interest +Statutory Interest! Hurray!

Read all about it: natwesttookmymoney - v- NatWest

DONATE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN TO KEEP THE SITE GOING.

 

What can you claim? Vampiress has a good idea:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/69877-what-can-you-claim.html

Anything I say is just a suggestion. I'm a bigmouth, not a lawyer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Den

 

Call the bank. They're the only ones who can stop it or even tell you if it's too late. Explain that you were pressurised into making a payment. They may be sympathetic.

 

Good luck

Westy

 

 

 

If you like my post, click the scales!!

 

Nov 1 2006 Preliminary letter

21 Feb 2007 - cheque arrived for charges+DEBIT interest +Statutory Interest! Hurray!

Read all about it: natwesttookmymoney - v- NatWest

DONATE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN TO KEEP THE SITE GOING.

 

What can you claim? Vampiress has a good idea:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/69877-what-can-you-claim.html

Anything I say is just a suggestion. I'm a bigmouth, not a lawyer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...