Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you do get a letter of Claim and or Pre Action Protocol pack 15. Where there has been non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction, the court may order that (a) the parties are relieved of the obligation to comply or further comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (b) the proceedings are stayed while particular steps are taken to comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (c) sanctions are to be applied. 16. The court will consider the effect of any non-compliance when deciding whether to impose any sanctions which may include— (a) an order that the party at fault pays the costs of the proceedings, or part of the costs of the other party or parties; (b) an order that the party at fault pay those costs on an indemnity basis; (c) if the party at fault is a claimant who has been awarded a sum of money, an order depriving that party of interest on that sum for a specified period, and/or awarding interest at a lower rate than would otherwise have been awarded; (d) if the party at fault is a defendant, and the claimant has been awarded a sum of money, an order awarding interest on that sum for a specified period at a higher rate, (not exceeding 10% above base rate), than the rate which would otherwise have been awarded. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct   .
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Thanks all! My wife was driving at the time (took our daughter to get new school uniform) and I wasn't there so I'm not sure what the signage was actually like, but yes, Parkopedia says 2:30, so it's barely over that. I will check it out with her when she gets home later, I haven't even told her about this yet as she'll probably be quite upset. So - likely my best response at this stage is to just wait it out until a Letter Before Claim arrives?
    • check mcol does it state DQ N180 sent to you? if it does then: https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5088148 3 copies yes to mediation (unless you filed our Statute Barred Defence OR this is a claim for a Private Parking Ticket) 1 wit you Suitability for determination without a hearing? no (that the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally') the rest is obv 1 to the court 1 to their sols (omit phone/sig/email) if no sols send to claimant 1 for your file   dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rbs New 'bully Boy' Tactics


unicorn96
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6268 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Watch out for this one. Put in 3 claims to sheriff court RBS Visa, Mastercard and my own account. Within a few days i received a cheque for the Visa. Great i thought. Then last Friday had a letter regarding the other 2 saying they were prepared to settle out of court. I noted that there was a small difference in the amount they were going to pay and what i was claiming, so i pointed this out. This is the response i got :-

 

##The figure offered to you in my letter of 22 November 2006 discounts the interest that you seek of £11.23. Interest is generally available from the date of service of the summons on the defender. A sufficient legal basis has to be averred for any additional sums of interest you seek. The Bank has no notice of this. In these circumstances I am prepared to increase the offer by the interest on the charges from the date of service on the Bank (24 Oct 06). This gives a sum of £1.18. Continuing the spirit of goodwill I will round this figure up to £222.

I should be grateful if you would now confirm acceptance of this amended offer on the same terms as contained in my letter of 22 November 2006. Thereafter I will arrange for the payment to be made##

 

As i wanted to get this sorted out quickly, and because the difference was minimal i agreed. This is what i got back:-

 

##I have now arranged for your respective bank and credit card accounts to be credited with the sums of £430 and £222 respectively. As these were the accounts from which the funds were taken, it is to these accounts that any credit must be applied. I am afraid it is not possible to pay these settlement monies by cheque.

I trust this is self-explanatory##

 

I AM ABSOLUTELY FUMING .......... never did they in any correspondence say this and i feel that i have been lied to and taken for a fool. So i have replied with this:-

 

As per my original letters and the court summons, i require payment via cheque and will NOT accept any other means of payment. I no longer use either my Royal Bank of Scotland Bank Account or Credit Card Accounts, so there is no point in refunding the money into them. This was VERY CLEARLY stated on all my correspondence and the Court Summons. If you are not prepared to issue a cheque for the charges i will take the matter futher and cancel my letter to the court and advise them that i still wish to go ahead with the Summons. I still have until 30th November and am quite happy and prepared to go through with my claim in court. I received a cheque from RBS re charges on my Visa Account within a few days of filing my claim, so your statement that you cannot issue cheques is untrue and misleading. Never in any of your correspondence have you stated that you would be paying in any other way but via a cheque and this means that you have been misleading in all your correspondence. If you had pointed all this out at the start, i would not have agreed to settle out of court or been as quick to cancel the Summons. The Court Summons VERY CLEARLY stated i wished to be paid by cheque and i have already agreed to take less money than i actually claimed for and that you owe me, in order to settle this quickly and quietly, and i am vey angry and upset that you have been so dishonest. I'm sure the thousands of people on the Consumer Action Group web site and my local newspaper would be interested in your tactics as well. I'm still under no obligation to keep quiet. I am not prepared to waste anymore of my time on this, so if you are not in agreement then i will go back to the court tomorrow afternoon and ask for a continuence.

 

Please take heed from this and if you agree to settle out of court watch out for RBS's tactics.

 

Pauline xx

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the problem, these accounts are now closed and no longer used.

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They havent put it in yet. They have said they are going to. Barclaycard tried to do the same and i had to fight to get a cheque from them.

:grin: WON

GOLDFISH £291.90

MARBLES £174.47

RBOS VISA £232.19

AMEX (BLUE) £148.40

BARCLAYCARD £251.31

AMEX (BA) £151.50

RBOS M/C £222.00

RBOS (MY ACC) £430.00

BARCLAYS £505.00

MBNA £250.00

RBOS (JOINT) £2975.00

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

what if an account has defaulted and the card/bank is still owed money by me? so in basic terms lets say i am succesful in claiming 1000 pounds but i owe them 1500 pounds and the account is only still "open" for repayment purposes? are the banks within their rights to use the 1000 pounds to decrease the debt i owe them? or must they send me a cheque and then i continue with the prearranged payment plan? does anyone know the answer to this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

edit

Telewest v RBS

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland-bank/61214-telewest-rbs.html[/url]

Telewest v A&L

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester/61215-telwest-l.html[/url]

Telewest v Halifax

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/63775-telewest-halifax.html[/url]

 

If I've helped - hit the scales and rate me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Espana07,

 

If you raise an action against the bank in respect of charges applied to your account and you still owe money on that account, the Bank could seek to raise a counterclaim against you for full repayment of the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...