Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

contacted my local MP


lisamellor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6286 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well after a long time thinking about this i have contacted my local mp, stephen barrow, regarding the whole bank charge subject.

 

i asked him if he was aware of this going on, he didnt have a clue, so i offered to help the community by going to local ward meetings. he is going to contact the other mps and see if they know anyone who i can help. now dont get me wrong, i am definatley not saying ive done it so i know what im doing, far from it, but i think that this would be a great way to get it into the community who are totally unaware of their rights. and if i can help just one family then i will feel sooo much better.

 

lisaxx

if i have helped you at all click please the scales on top right!

 

ABBEY

11/4 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) SENT OFF

1/6 LBA SENT

22/7 LETTER SENT REQUESTING THEM TO REFUND CHARGES

15/7 STATEMENTS RECEIVED (ALL 6 YEARS WORTH)

20/7 CLAIM ISSUES IN OLDHAM COUNTY COURT.

8/8 CLAIM ACKNOWLEDGED GIVING THEM TILL 21/8.......

SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!

 

T MOBILE i won!

16/6 Data Protection Act SENT OFF

 

5/8 t mobile have failed to comply with the Data Protection Act/S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) reques ....BRING IT ON BABY!!

7/8 LBE SENT GIVING THEM 7 DAYS TO COUGH UP MY CASH

7/9 FULL REFUND BEEN SENT!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I've done similar. At the start of my own little campaign against MBNA, the Hellifax and the Nation-wideboys, I contacted my local MP to give him details about CAG and suggest to his office that any constituent who experiences problems simlar to mine, may wish to use the CAG website for an idea of how to find informal, but great quality, advice and support.

 

I've followed this up with details of my own small success in dealing with MBNA and getting all my charges back, and hope to be able to follow it up soon with a success story on both the Halifax and N'wide.

 

We have also had communications over the auto-diallers used by the financial institutions. I have relayed my experience of being called daily, on the hour, sometimes two or three times an hour and requested that he take steps to raise this where necessary in parliament.

 

I suppose as individuals we can only keep relaying details of our own campaigns to the local politicians, colleagues and friends. Let people know that this cannot be allowed to continue. 4 months ago I thought I had a never ending hole of debt. Now, I am confident that I have a way out. The only difference is availablity of information and stumbling across CAG one day.

 

Now I'm an addict - even stopping one woman in the Buchanan Street, Glasgow, branch of the N'wide who was arguing over her charges. I gave her the CAG website address and told her to give it a go! The look on the staff members face was a picture!

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great!! think the more people who get involved the better. have you thought about contacting your local paper?? telling them how you are going on?

 

lisaxx

if i have helped you at all click please the scales on top right!

 

ABBEY

11/4 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) SENT OFF

1/6 LBA SENT

22/7 LETTER SENT REQUESTING THEM TO REFUND CHARGES

15/7 STATEMENTS RECEIVED (ALL 6 YEARS WORTH)

20/7 CLAIM ISSUES IN OLDHAM COUNTY COURT.

8/8 CLAIM ACKNOWLEDGED GIVING THEM TILL 21/8.......

SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!

 

T MOBILE i won!

16/6 Data Protection Act SENT OFF

 

5/8 t mobile have failed to comply with the Data Protection Act/S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) reques ....BRING IT ON BABY!!

7/8 LBE SENT GIVING THEM 7 DAYS TO COUGH UP MY CASH

7/9 FULL REFUND BEEN SENT!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

My local MP thinks that bank charges are a great deterrent, but then he would he has declared interests in several banks, for your information he is Jonathon Djanogly MP for Huntingdonshire and this is not defamatory or libellous, I posted his reply to my thread. I make sure I tell everyone about CAG and even did a letter box drop in our area to try and make people aware of this. i have made contact with the nearest Credit Union to us and will be working as a volunteer over there and helping people who have similar problems. I refer as many people to this webiste as I can. the more people who know ther rights, the more the banks and the MP's will have to notice.

 

Go for it and make more people aware of the rights and help as many others as you can gain back what is rightfully theirs. this has to start at the ground root level. it is the only way to get things changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Margaret Beckett and Alistair Darlings answer will be posted on here tomorrow( i've tried and can't)

What a pair of ***kers

She passed it on to him and he says "the OFT are satisfied no further intervention is warrented in this area at this time and that this change has brought about substantial benefits for consumers".

PETITION THE PRIME MINISTER

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Force the banks to repay unlawful bank charges and remove the six year time bar, forcing them to pay back everything from at least 1980.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

What we need is thread where all the MP's replies can be posted for all to read.

 

Perhaps one of the MODS could organise this (sorry ladies and gentlemen) this way all the answers are in one place with no generalised comments by the members, just MP's letters.

 

It just might make the MP's sit up, as their researchers will certainly point this out to them. Nothing like keeping the pressure on all of them.

 

As my dad says,'It is your job to keep the b=r=t=r=s honest and take notice of what really affects their constituents not what they think the voting public wants'

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/42944-did-you-contact-your.html

 

Looking a bit disjointed, as I just extracted the responses without the other posts wich were in this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/23602-your-mp.html

 

(they're still there as well if you need the context)

 

Now go and post your MP responses in there, I'm done! ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Write back to your MP and advise him that he is merely expressing an opinion on this matter.

 

The fact is that these charges are unlawful under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Go to Office of Public Sector Information and serch for the legislation, print it off and send it to him see if he can argue the toss with you then.

 

Your MP is there to look after constituents. My response would be I did not ask for your opinion in this matter I asked what your party is going to do to enforce this law better and bring justice to millions of account holders.

 

UP THE REVOLUTION!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...