Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HELP!!! Caught Stealing from Superdrug


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1815 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya all I’m Applepie123

 

I’m only 16 and I went into Superdrug and wanted to just take an eye brow pencil as I had lost the one I had ACTUALLY bought so I thought I’d just take it out the box and leave the box with the barcode.

 

Unfortunately, I didn’t notice that a man was watching and if I’m being honest I didn’t care because he looked as though he was part of the general public. So I carried on and walked out the shop. As I was waiting for a friend I decided to stand by the side of the shop (which wasn’t smart) and there the man came and showed me some badge and said “can u follow me to the back of the shop miss”

 

i didn’t want to cry so I become a bit giggly and he thought as though I wasn’t taking it seriously 😐. He was quite rude, which in a way he kinda had right to.

He asked me to hand it over and showed me the box I had left by the side. It was him and a Superdrug worker. He then asked me what my name was and my address and if I had ID to verify it. I didn’t. Then he stated that he’d have to call the police then to verify it or speak with my mother. I definitely wasn’t going to let him speak with my mother so I showed him my card which verified my name, I gave him my date of birth, my mothers name but the wrong number for my mothers telephone.

 

He told me I’m banned from that Superdrug and many other shops in town for the next 12 months and shouldn’t be surprised if I’m caught in one and kicked out.

He thrn said that I’ll receive a letter to my house stating the cost of my fine he said it could be £80, £100, which I wasn’t happy about, as he left the price unclear. Then he said u can pay it all at once or in instalments. He then took a picture of me, wrote what I was wearing, my height and made me sign a document, but also gave me some sheets to take. He escorted me out the shop , and at that point I felt so humiliated and embarrassed 😳.

I do regret doing it considering it was only £2.40 and I will never do it again.

 

But it I was wondering if you could help me with the following

 

1)who will the letter come addressed to and how long does it usually take to come ?(as I don’t want my mom to see it)

2)does it state every little detail about the crime or does it just generalise it? E.g “your daughter has been caught stealing”

3)how do they calculate the fine and if anyone knows roughly how much I may have to pay?

 

And is it worth me paying it or just ignoring it, because I feel if I just pay for it they will leave me alone and I’ll be done with it and won’t have to worry.

Edited by Andyorch
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

First off, I am assuming that Superdrug are part of a shop/storewatch scheme so yes he would be able to pass your details onto others stores within the same scheme BUT, he cannot state that you are banned from other stores. Each store will have different procedures to dealing with shoplifters. You would normally be asked to leave if they chose to. All stores are private and customers are there by invitation only and that invitation can be withdrawn for any or no reason at all.

 

If memory serves me right, Superdrug use Retail Loss prevention (RLP) to collect these "fines!" It is no such thing. It is a charge levied by RLP to you but it has no legal nor lawful power over you. You do not pay it. They have no right to it. Yes they can chase and make statements about court which they don't do. The can't. Only Superdrug can but they don't bother as it would cost them far more than they would ever get back.

 

The bad stuff. RLP will write to you directly but their letters are franked (no stamp) with their name on it. Nasty but I have checked and they can get away with it.

If you don't respond, it has been noted that RLP wrote to the Parent/Guardian. Whether they still do this, I don't know. With this in mind, it would benefit you if you 'fessed up' to your parents but only if you live in a stable family environment. Once that is done, you can direct them to this forum and show them your (and other) threads to show just how powerless RLP are. Letters could take two to three weeks to arrive.

 

The letters generalise matters rather than going into fine detail due to RLP using standard template letters. They don't calculate how much they want. They just make up a number and include that in the letter. They also state that each event costs the retailer £300-£500 which is a load of bovine excement. They include this in order to make you think you owe them X amount. You stole. The store got the goods back. No loss. Security staff are paid whether or not they catch a shoplifter.

 

I really do encourage you to confide in your mum at the very least because you are not obliged to pay this spurious charge-ever. Nobody can take court action against you mainly because you are under 18 and for the reasons above.

 

When you get a letter (IF) can you cover up all your details and post them here. I haven't had a good laugh for ages. Also, read this https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?448994-RLP-FAQ-s-What-do-they-mean-Reviewed-September-2015&p=4762870&viewfull=1#post4762870

 

and read around the forum as well

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

you are of an age where you are deemed to be responsible for your own actiosn and decision making. this means that RLP have no right or obligation to contact anyione else about this matter and if they do so they are breaking the law.

however, that wont stop them as they know you are unlikely to sue them for the breach of the data protection legislation. best tell your mother what yu have told us, suffer the ear bashing and then explain what we ahve said aboyt RLP and their like with regard to their baseless and unlawful demands for money. your mother may well decide to let them know what a buch of shysters they are if they do write to her if she knows about the advice you have been given.

We dont condone theft or damage of shop's stock but we dont belive that people should be punished twice, especially by soemone who has nothing to do with anything like RLP

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello abc, welcome to CAG.

 

Hopefully Applepie will reply to you, but in the meantime it would be a good idea to start a new thread of your own and tell us what has happened. That way we can advise you on your particular situation.

 

Best,

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is not a FINE

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...