Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tesco/Intrum


CathW
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1518 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning fellow Caggers,

 

It has been a while since I have been on this site. Both my husband & I have a Tesco debit card which we are paying a small amount of monthly as agreed by Tesco.

 

We have been doing this for a number of years and then out of the blue we have both received a letter from Intrum UK Finance Ltd (Reigate) saying that they are now the legal owners of the debts and that we have to pay them from now on (the letter has a photo copy signature by Gavin Flynn Operations Director).

 

With the letter was a photo copy headed letter from Tesco Bank Recoveries saying that if we have a repayment plan in place then we can continue to pay but we now have to pay Intrum Uk Finance Ltd (this letter is unsigned).

 

Am I right in thinking that we ignore Intrum and continue to pay Tesco directly.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it a Notice of Assignment...as the debt been sold to Intrum Uk Finance Ltd ?

 

 

Andy

 

Thread moved to the appropriate forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you possibly scan the letter and redact and upload...sounds like a veiled attempt of NOA

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cath click this > Upload

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi,
I have a Tesco card that I am paying off £1-50 per month by standing order to Tesco Classic which I have been paying since 22 Feb 2011.

 

Last year I received  letter from Intrum saying they are now the legal owners of the debt with a copy o a letter from Tesco (not signed) attached saying that they have transferred the debt to Intrum UK Finance Limited and I should now be paying them. I have not paid them anything and I am still paying Tesco.

 

I received a letter from Intrum dated 8 January 2020 saying Broken Repayment Plan with the reference number, Date Purchased, Account number and Balance.

 

Letter  dated 15 January with a Periodic Statement which list the date of the payments, description Payment to Client (Purchase) and then the credit of the payments

 

Letter dated 29 January Introducing our Legal Team (Lily Chan) saying that the collection team have passed it to the legal department as I haven't agreed a way to pay the money to them.

 

We are now in charge of getting a County Court Judgment issued to me to demand I pay the money back.


Get in touch within 10 days or we we'll (there word not mine) pass your account to our solicitors. 


They'll (again there word not mine) write to me explaining what I owe and giving me a last chance to pay. If I don't pay they may apply for a CCJ. The Court can demand that I also pay the solicitors costs and court fees, which they will add to the balance that I owe the.


It is not to late to pay them back, just call by 08/02/2020 we promise to listen and try to work out a payment plan I can afford.


My question is, can they apply for a CCJ as I am still paying Tesco £1-50 per month and have never missed a payment.
Thank you CathW

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

 

Send them a cca request?

 

Is this a letter of claim?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say that if you had an instalment agreement with Tesco to pay £1.50 per month and you have kept your side of the agreement completely – then even though Tesco have sold the account to someone else, they will not be able to dislodge the agreement that you had with Tesco's. In other words my view is that any debt they sell to Tesco's comes encumbered with any agreement that Tesco's made before they sold it.

However you should certainly follow the advice above to send them a CCA request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I may have misunderstood – they wcan't oblige you to pay more than £1.50 – but you may well have to pay to the assignees of the debt.

However, it scarcely believable that they would sue you simply to force you to pay them £1.50 per month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk and BankFodder,

 

the reply to Dx100uk, yes I will send them a cca  and it is just a letter at the moment saying that if I don't reply to them and offer a payment to them, then they might issue a ccj against me

 

and the reply to BankFodder is that I will send a cca to Intrum and see what they come up with as in my opinion I have never signed anything saying that I owe Intrum any money, they have just paid the debt for me and I am continuing to pay Tesco directly 
Regards Burrowes 29 (ex CathW)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...