Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Local authority eviction - scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1768 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

New here and hoping someone can help.

 

i have an assured tenancy with my local council.

I have been in the property for eight years.

 

When my daughter left school two years ago I informed the council that she would be a full time student after the summer.

Two months later I got a letter stating that there is an overpayment of housing benefit due to non dependent for summer months.

My daughter did not work/claim benefits during the summer as she was too ill to do so.

 

I questioned the overpayment of housing benefit as they were informed weeks before my daughter left school and told them that it’s their mistake ‘technical error’ that HB was overpaid.

 

i then got notice in nov 2017 that they would be seeking a court order for possession of the property.

They claim rent arrears of £123.

 

I repeated my stance on the matter that this is the fault of the council and that current housing guidelines state that overpayment of HB cannot be treated the same way as rent arrears I.e. they cannot evict.

 

the council ignored this and continued to send letters/turn up at my door etc.

 

I then got court papers for eviction proceedings for the about of £563.

This amount included the first summers non dependant rent plus the summer of 2018.

 

I pointed out to the council again that felt I did not owe for summer 2017 and summer 2018 was null and void as daughter was on a two year Full time course and therefore classed as a full time student.

 

I filled in the court papers saying I was defending the case and stating my reasons why, I also stated the amount claimed owed was wrong as the council was claiming my daughter was not a full time student.

 

I also put in a counter claim for the state of the property; mould caused by roof not being fixed by council etc. + harassment, the council hounded me + maladministration.

 

i could not attend court on the date of the hearing as I was receiving treatment for cancer,

the council were informed of my cancer diagnosis 3 months before the court case but didn’t stop them from hounding me.

I asked and received a sist from the court on these grounds but have yet to get a letter from the court confirming this.

 

i was rudely woken yesterday morning by someone battering my door,

by the time I got up and went downstairs they were gone but a postcard on the mat showed it was a rent officer from the council.

 

i called this morning to ask what was so important that they had to wake me up on a Sunday morning for = rent arrears

 

it appears the court sent back the court case for the council to investigate,

they now state that they have removed over £400 in rent arrears from my account as they made a mistake,

so the amount owed is now £300 and they want a payment plan from me.

 

i asked why were they dealing with this when it is a live court case, I told them I will still be defending my case etc.

 

sorry for the long story but I’m trying to find out if their court paperwork is still valid, giving that they now concede it states the wrong amount owed?

 

i also need to know if I can ask for another sist given that I have not been informed by the court of the next hearing date and 7 days notice is not enough time for me to prepare my case.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've moved your thread to p'haps a better suited forum.

 

can you not ring the sheriffs clerk and ask what is going on with the claim, and that the claimant has now revised its amount?

typically in most Scottish courts there are reps from various charities that help on all council rent cases for free

which court is this please?

 

they could have represented you in your absence on your last hearing esp as its such a small sum, now ever smaller, and you are going thru cancer treatment.

are the council aware of this?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response.

I did see CAB advisor before my cancer diagnosis, at that time council claimed I owe £120, CAB advisor just laughed, said it was no big deal and was far more interested in the fact that I had been sanctioned by DWP for three years.

 

of course after my cancer diagnosis I was in no fit state to see to anything,

I informed the council months before they took court action,

I also informed my MP and local councillor.

 

i submitted written evidence to the court asking for an extension as I was receiving radiotherapy at the time and couldn’t attend.

I finished radiotherapy two weeks ago.

 

cant say I’m 100% and have further oncology appointments in the weeks ahead.

The case is to be heard in Hamilton but it’s not at the sherif court and I handed back all the paperwork to the court so I don’t know who to phone or what the case number even is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

worth a read

https://scotslawthoughts.wordpress.com/tag/hamilton-sheriff-court/

 

I suggest you get in contact with the court ASAP.

find out what is still on the cards.

you should be retaining paperwork not handing it all back.

 

get back onto CAB too

they will help you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi thought I’d give an update in case anyone else is in the same position.

i went to court and contested the action. The court rep came to me after the initial hearing to offer his service. 

I now have the arrears written off against the state of the property mould etc.

and now have a repairs plan in place to bring the property up to an acceptable state. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done!

can we mark this as resolved now?

 

glad to help

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...