Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Received TfL letter for using sister's travel pass


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been contacted by TFL for using my sisters card.

How do I start a new thread to get help.

 

I had apologised to TFL for using my sisters travel pass with my photo card.

They have wrote me another letter saying it can’t be an error.

 

I rang them up to see if there were any chances to settle this out of court.

To which they replied they do not settle out of court.

I really don’t want a criminal record for my mistake.

I am looking forward to this forum to help me.

 

I said to TFL, that I picked it up while hurrying for work.

It was a staff discount card.

It is not age related.

 

I wrote a letter apologising and will to pay fines and administrative costs.

Edited by dx100uk
merge/space
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thank you for the extra information. My reply to you seems to have gone walkabout but you've answered my questions.

 

TfL don't like this sort of thing, they don't understand [and I don't really] how you can pick up a card that doesn't look like your own, if you have one, and then use it with the wrong photo ID.

 

Have you had a court summons so far?

 

We have a couple of other similar threads here but I don't think they've been resolved yet. It's worth having a read around the forum.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not have a court summons yet.

They have written to me that they are still deciding.

 

My sisters monthly pass was left on the table ( it did not have her picture but just a small photo ID number).

I mistakenly took it thinking it’s mine only looking until when it was valid.

 

How do I explain this to TFL?

I regret not being more aware.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how to explain it, maybe someone else will. We see this story all the time and it's amazing the coincidences that happen when there's a full-priced card and a discount card. From what TfL have said to you, it seems they've heard the same thing a lot.

 

You can keep talking to them up to and including any court day to try to resolve this.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice. Are there any chances of settling this out of court?

 

what other form of apology would they accept? Should I write to them again?

 

We have too little detail to be able to fully advise.

 

What really happened?

What colour wallets were the card (s) in?. If not their original wallets, why not?

 

Bear in mind CAG has heard all sorts of stories of how someone 'accidentally' used the wrong pass. Some seem more plausible than others.

TfL will have heard as many, and more. How do you intend to persuade them yours has the ring of truth (starting with the whole, unvarnished truth is a good starting point ....)

 

Do you think you might accidentally have used the wrong pass more than once?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not use the pass before.

I did ask my sister why her pass was lying on the table and not in her photocard holder.

She said that she had spilled coffee on her photocard holder and removed the travel pass and kept it on the table.

 

Is it worth explaining this to TFL or just saying that I used my sisters card?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not use the pass before. I did ask my sister why her pass was lying on the table and not in her photocard holder. She said that she had spilled coffee on her photocard holder and removed the travel pass and kept it on the table.

 

If you picked up your sister's staff pass, not in a wallet:

a) why wasn't your pass in a wallet?

b) what colour is your pass? and hers?.

 

Was hers like:

http://i.imgur.com/aSReD.jpg

 

 

 

Was it really a mistake?. If it was, be prepared to explain it in detail, as TfL hear "it was a mistake" all the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you only used it once.

was this by design..you meant to do it, or just a mistake upon your behalf?

 

thread tidied too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you're saying that you only used your sister's pass once, but that you took it knowing that you didn't have your own pass that month? That doesn't look great.

 

Remember that TfL can check journeys on the card going back about 8 weeks.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was my mistake. I did not realise I did not buy a pass for that month.

 

So, not only did you mistake your Sister’s staff pass for your pass, you forgot you hadn’t bought a pass that month.

 

I can’t see TfL being convinced this was an honest mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will it be better if I say I did it on purpose? But if I did, it would mean that I lied in my first letter

 

I don’t know, what is the truth??

The problem with lying is remembering who you have told what. The advantage of the truth : only one version to remember!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from TFL stating that I was reported for failing to provide a valid ticket, pass or photo-card on a TFL journey. I write this letter to explain my version of events.

 

I took my sisters monthly pass in a haste while leaving my house. When asked to show my valid ticket for the journey, I showed the pass and the inspector pointed out it was not my pass. I realised my mistake and he withdrew both and took my interview under caution.

 

I would like to apologise to the TFL team and I am willing to pay any fines, or the charges due to extra administration work TFL had to go thorough because of my mistake. Hoping that TFL would to solve the matter out of court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if that's all you sent IMHO its a bit bare and you seriously need to come clean, unless you honestly thought yours was still valid and picked hers up thinking it was your valid card?

 

but if you really knew yours was empty and took hers par chance you didn't get caught and did...

its sort of in a way going in your favour, as you knew you'd be caught and did...

 

pers I think you need to send another, more frank and honest begging letter like the ones we have here..

if yours was only what is above, it doesn't address their pondering that it wasn't a mistake.

 

might be better if you scan yup their reply to PDF please

read upload.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with dx. To have any chance of TfL settling this, in addition to what dx says, you need to show genuine remorse and tell them what impact a conviction would have on your career or future career. And you need to promise you'll never, ever do this again.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...