Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shoplifting 2nd offence Scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having previously never been in trouble in my 54 years I got caught shoplifting in Dec 2016 and was given a fiscal fine in February 2017 which would stay on my record for 2 years.

 

I cannot explain why though I did this again in ASDA in December 2018 (within the 2 years) stealing an SD card with a value of £11 which I didn’t need nor have used.

 

This was seen on CCTV with the police identified me from my car number plate in the car park after which they asked me to attend the police station last week and charged me with the offence.

 

They said as my fiscal fine was still within the 2 years they would have to refer it to the procurator fiscal.

 

I have a good job earning over £50k per year and cannot explain why I did this the first time never mind the second.

It beggars belief.

 

My question though is what the likely penalty is.

 

Can I get another fiscal fine or another alternative to prosecution as a conviction would likely end up with me losing my job as I require annual DBS checks

Link to post
Share on other sites

that is somewhat within your control.

for some reason you feel it was correct to repeat the offence.

 

your best actions to mitigate things is to seek medical help thru your gp.

 

if you show you are dealing with the issue that way, you might well find that the system will look upon you with a more lenient eye...

 

your only issue might well be the 2yrs gap in attaining help.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your quick reply

 

Do you think their is a chance this might not go to court and be dealt with as an alternative to prosecution or as it is a 2nd offence within the 2 year period of the fiscal fine that this is a given.

 

If there is a chance I can prevent it from going to court by going to my GP how would the PF know this before making the decision to prosecute

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will get prior notification upon what, if anything, is going to happen,

you will be given the opportunity to reply to that.

 

indicating that, after sometime, you now realise there is some mental? [for want of a better reason] that you now see you need to deal with, you have and are seeking advice from your GP.

 

you cant predict 'what' is going happen, you will have to await contact from the court system, but you certainly can, then, mitigate what will happen from that point on.

 

but you must be seen to take 'the lead' not let the system lead you....

 

to date that is the primary reason the sheriff will look at to if this is taken further.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again,

 

Is there anything I can do to mitigate the Procurator Fiscals decision before it gets to court.

 

Can I write to them advising I am seeking medical advice and request a direct measure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have a workplace doctor? If you have an annual DBS check then it might be a lot better if the information about this comes directly from you rather than by some formal disclosure process.

 

Tell it all, tell it early and tell it yourself could be a very good principle to apply. At the very least I would recommend seeing a doctor – as recommended above – and then if you can start to get yourself into a treatment process then maybe a visit to HR for a frank disclosure with them will help to forestall or to dilute any problems. If you have a workplace doctor, then even better.

 

You're the one who's going to have to judge whether this is in your best interests.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for that

 

I'm going to make an appointment to see my doctor over the coming days to get the support I need.

 

Is it possible if I do this and disclose this at court I may get a deferred sentence to finish my counselling and show no further offending.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure this would be very helpful in mitigation – but I suppose that it will still come up in the next DBS enquiry.

 

If you do see a doctor and the doctor agrees that there is some problem then of course a written report which details your condition and the diagnosis will be enormously helpful. The court may well require its own reports to be prepared.

 

Once again, do you have an in-house medical service? They will be bound by rules of confidentiality so you can go to them quite safely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'cuse me asking but what court would this be?

and were all the goods recovered in both cases?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again,

 

My company uses an organisation called Health Assured who offer one to one or telephone counselling.

 

Do you think this is a better option?

 

In reply to DX's post:

 

The items were recovered in the first instance though the 2nd occasion was 3 weeks after event as a result of CCTV

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Sorry it would be Kilmarnock court

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Sorry it would be Kilmarnock court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again,

 

My company uses an organisation called Health Assured who offer one to one or telephone counselling.

 

Do you think this is a better option?

I would use both but ask for a face-to-face session, not telephone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I believe in Scotland they have a system in place for low level shoplifting. This thread is one where a poster was dealt with.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?442152-police-caution-shoplifting-SCOTLAND-**RESOLVED**&p=4701064&viewfull=1#post4701064

 

There will be a reason why you did this and my initial thoughts are a bit of depression (but don't take my word for it). There are many other reasons as well. Low seratonin levels could be a cause too. No excuses for what you did, just possible reasons this happens.

 

I would rather have face to face conversations with a counsellor rather than a phone chat. Face to face gives the interviewer/counsellor a better idea of your remorse and the fact you are dealing with your issues rather than burying your head in the sand.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this.

 

I did see this thread though and have a fair idea how the alternative to prosecution and direct measure process works in Scotland.

 

The difference is that this is a second offence and the question is whether an alternative to prosecution can be issued in this instance.

 

I have today though arranged for six face to face Cognitive Behavioural Therapy sessions through Health Assured our workplace provider.

 

Hopefully this will shed some light on why I have done this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that an important spin-off from this move is that when you get to a point that you decide to pre-empt the DBS disclosure to your employer, you can tell them that you have already gone into their own workplace health service and that you are happy for records to be made available to your employer. I think it would be difficult for the employer to cause you too many problems if you are actually availing yourself of the service which they themselves had provided.

 

In addition to getting help, there is a little bit of politics here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that and to everyone who has provided guidance and advice.

 

I will update the thread with how the counselling went and the penalty I received.

 

 

Thanks again...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...