Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The funds were taken by eBay, rather than Paypal.  I presume Paypal collects the funds from eBay, and so eBay then sting me for the money.   But either way, before this money was taken from my account, my eBay account balance showed as -£85.  Yes, my bank account has been debited by this amount. eBay say that they are completely removed from the chargeback process, because it is carried out by the buyer's financial institution.  So, conveniently, they cannot help, other than by refunding the chargeback fee of £14. 
    • Perfect, thanks for the detailed response. Once question, do you know how long it takes for the breathing space to get applied? Say for example I have payments due in 4 days and I apply today how does that work? Also, sorry for sounding stupid but what do you mean by default once the breathing space is in place? I mean what does "Default" mean.  After the breathing space is over and I wanted more time, what would happen? I can and will afford the payments after a few months but I just need that breather to sort some stuff out, as I have said I have never missed a payment. Sorry for the many replies but after doing a quick search, correct me if i am wrong. If it then does go into default and it goes to a collection agency am I right in saying they will send many letters and they may consider a claim? and I should only response if an official MoneyClaim is made? Also, If it does go into default does this severely affect my credit score? or will this only be in the case if a CCJ is applied.
    • there isn't one yet use the default mentioned already there. that covers all 3 debts as i assume the PAPLOC is for all 3 debts? dx  
    • a chargeback via a paypal account used in an ebay sale doesn't usually result in funds being sucked from your bank account,  just that you attain a paypal negative balance. as you saying the money was taken by paypal from your bank account without you authorising this? or is it directly the buyers name that is shown? regarding the chargeback but either way you bank account HAS been debited? dx  
    • what solicitor is the PAPLOC from? then just search xxxx snotty letter dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deed of postponement


cruzhughes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1922 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help me with a letter template for a deed of postponement.

 

At the moment I’m thinking of remortgaging to a better deal.

 

mortgage advisor advised that I would need to write to the people named on the deeds to see if they would agree to this.

 

The main problem is that the company 3rd on the list is welcome finance who have sold the debt to a company via a deed of assignment called prime credit who are now 4th on the list.

Any debt owed is made up of penatly charges and part of a long running dispute with both owners.

That resulted in a possession hearing last year which I won.

But the arguement now on this debt is that it should be a lot lower than what they are claiming.

 

At worse I will have to add this 18k debt into the remortgage.

But ideally would rather only remortgage for 67K not including this debt as it’s set at 0%.

 

In amongst arguing what is owed

I want to get a letter off to Lloyds first to see if they agree.

 

Then welcome.

Last on the list will be prime as there’s many unresolved issues with their debt.

Like the actual balance when historical fees and charges are removed the debt will be no where near 18k.

 

I doubt prime will agree to the deed of postponement.

 

But i need to start somewhere.

And if the6 do take me back to court I have all my eggs in One basket sort of speak

 

If anyone can’t point me in the right direction to this type of letter it would be amazing.

 

thank you

PDF Photos 29-11-2016.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will this do the job do you think?

 

 

To whom it may concern,

 

I am writing to you today concerning an equitable charge that yourselves, Lloyds Bank registered against my property on 26/08/2006 at Brighton county court Ranking 3rd on my Land Registry Title Deeds.

 

As it stands after applying for official copies

 

Land Registry have confirmed they don't hold a document copy

• Brighton court have confirmed they don't hold a document copy.

• My local county court have confirmed they don't hold a document copy.

 

I am in the process of looking to remortgage the property at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I have been advised by my mortgage advisor to seek further information from yourselves as this could cause problems after a mortgage application has been submitted.

 

Are you able substantiate the the above charge, If not then I request you discharge it forthwith .

 

In the event you are able to substantiate this charge. Would you consent to a deed of postponement if I was to remortgage the property.

 

I thank you for your time and look forward to hearing from you within 14 days.

 

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar the Lloyds Gresham house address?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing was in the sar from Lloyds.

 

Link say they purchased it 2016 but nothing has changed re deeds since. Even though they sent this out last May https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?467188-In-middle-of-Ppi-claim-with-Lloyds-and-the-sell-10-year-old-debt-to-asset-link/page5 post 90

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...