Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Idem Claim Form - halifax / Lloyds TSB credit cards***Claim Discontinued***


yodabug
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1764 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Hope everyone is well.

 

Had this back recently - after months on inactivity on all accounts.

 

For a Lloyd’s credit card

 

This is the one and only sheet sent back from Idem.

 

Looks like an application form to me ?

 

Any help much appreciated.

 

Thanks for looking and Bon weekend !

 

Here is correct picture

Lloyd’s scan 2.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not compliant. Im guessing you got it from idem?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you read that I cant!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nowhere near compliant. even if it was legible.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

what the debt history yoda..

if idem have it

sure as eggs is eggs there is something wrong with the debt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Name of the Claimant ? Idem Capital Securities Limited

Date of issue – 15 Jan 2019

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1 ) Agreements between Halifax / Lloyds TSB and the cardholder ( D )

 

2 ) The balance of the accounts were legally assigned to the Claimant ( C ) 17/06/2015

 

3 ) D accrued balance *** A/C 1 Credit Card o/s bal £4500 A/C 2 Credit card o/s Bal £4500

 

4 ) D defaulted on payments

 

5 ) C issued Formal Demand requested payment dated 03/01/2019

 

6 ) Amount now due from D £9000

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Yes just to update them in case they hadnt got it

 

What is the total value of the claim? £9000 ( amalgamated two credit card debts )

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? both credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? before

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that i can remember

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? advice from kind folk here

 

What was the date of your last payment? march 2018 ( via payplan )

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planlink3.gif? yes and I was with payplan until march 2018

 

 

 

Good evening Peeps and happy new year.

 

Ive just made a donation

 

I have just Received a Claim Form Today

 

I have received a cca back for the lloyds one pls see link : -

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?490321-Lloyd%92s-idem-CCA-return&p=5150881#post5150881

 

and was told it was illegible / incomplete.

 

Nothing from the Halifax one back.

 

Should I get two new CCA's running ?

and do I send them to the Claimant on Claim Form ?

( Idem Capital ) ?

 

I am doing a lot of reading at the moment of past similar case

s- but just uploading this bit, as I dont want to lose the draft.

( kids bed time )

 

This Claim form is the first real threatogram.

I have NOT received a PAP letter.

Edited by dx100uk
merge/format
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fkofilee

 

I have just found a letter - not headed Letter of claim or anything but has following details -

 

Current Balance £4500

Original Vendor Lloyds TSB

Date your account was purchased by Idem - *** ** 2015

Balance at the point of purchase by Idem £4500

Date of agreement **** ****** 2002

Parties to the loan - **** *********

 

I cannot find the rest of paperwork - but it does say we are in the process of referring to our litigation dept.

 

so this COULD od been it - so sorry to confuse.

 

I have logged into MCOL and done acknowledgement of service, and defended all.

 

I will also send a CPR 31.14 request to send signed for to Claimant in the morning.

 

Hi just a quick question re : CPR 31.14 request.

 

With regards to the formal demand ( Part 5 of particulars of claim )

 

I thought ONLY the original creditor can issue a formal demand ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

can we have the particulars of claim

EXACTLY as they are written on the claimform please

that doesn't look like an IDEM POC to me.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hold off on rushing around sending CPR/CCA yet please..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers DX !

 

This is EXACTLY as written - ** please note they have inserted two ' upside down question marks ' ( could be a typo ) - i have input these here as normal question marks.

 

1 ) Agreements between halifax / Lloyds TSB and the cardholder ( D )

 

2 ) The balance of the accounts were legally assigned to the Claimant ( C ) 17/06/2015

 

3 ) D accrued balance *** A/C 1 ? Credit Card o/s bal £4500

 

A/C 2 ? Credit card o/s Bal £4500

 

4 ) D defaulted on payments

 

5 ) C issued Formal Demand requesting payment dated 03/01/2019

 

6 ) Amount now due from D £9000

 

 

That is it Ad Verbatim.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you.

this could be fun as I doubt the assignments WERE on the same day...!!

 

do the usual

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

 

 

….

 

you must send 2 CCA requests

one for EACH ACCOUNT

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Probably a Silly question - I have filed electronically on MCOL - adding in my email and phone details on the form. Are these ' visible ' to the claimant ? ?

 

As I do not what them having my details ? ( and only just thought about this )

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No if you did it on mcol website

Just dont put them on their copy of the n180

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I please check my defence file date --

 

on claim form I have 15th January -

so plus 33 days comes out as sunday 17th February.

So I have worked it as the preceeding friday 15th february.

 

( its just the acknowledgement of service pack says 28 days )

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already explained in post 16…….......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning All

 

just using my downtime reading a lot of cases. Just a quick question - as I'm preparing my defence.

 

they have stated in theyre POC.

 

D defaulted on payments

 

Because they have not worded ' Issued a Default notice ' should I use something like this....

 

Paragraph 2 is denied I do not recall the nature of any breach Therefore I have sought clarity by way of a CPR 31.14 request sent signed for ***** and shows as received signed for ***** The claimant has yet to comply.

 

or just go with the standard default response of :-

 

Paragraph * is denied. I am unaware of any service of a Default Notice pursuant to section 87 of the consumer credit

Act 1974. I have sought verification from the claimant regarding this matter and they have been unable to comply.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably the latter but no rush yet

not due till the 15th

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...