Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Amazon uk - delivery company damaged our car on driveway. ***RESOLVED***


xxorlsxx
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1917 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I will keep this short,

 

we had a delivery from amazon,

the driver damaged our car,

we complained and filled out an online claims form from a company called ARC claims based in New Jersey,

 

they agreed to pay for the damage but are actively stalling payment (Various reasons).

 

I have Googled this company and many people are still waiting for payment,

i am considering taking amazon uk to a small claims court,

 

any advice would be great.

 

Many Thanks.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that you had a delivery from Amazon – but who did you actually purchase from? Meaning who organised the delivery?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if you purchased from Amazon and Amazon organised the delivery, I really don't understand why you have bothered to start making a claim against a company in New Jersey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From a quick look at ARC website they are a claims management company who manage claims against self-insured trucking companies. So I'd guess the delivery company was the UK subsidiary of one of the large, US owned companies, UPS or someone like that, and ARC are acting for the delivery company.

 

Did you get the details of the delivery vehicle that caused the damage? If so a small claims court action against them (the UK delivery company) might be a better bet.

 

But I'm wondering if it's premature to start any legal action right this minute given that you say they have agreed to pay you. Can you give more details about ARC "actively stalling payment (Various bull**** reasons)."? How long since they agreed to pay you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm probably going to disagree here.

 

There is no reason why you should have to tolerate unreasonable delays from some third-party courier company or their claims management company.

 

This is a bit like purchasing a laptop computer from Currys and then when it goes wrong being told to go directly to Dell or to Asus to get it fixed.

 

This is Amazon managing to distance themselves from the hassle of having to field complaints themselves and it also relieves them from the responsibility of having to take it up with the courier to ensure better quality.

 

If you purchase from Amazon UK then your complaint is clearly against Amazon UK. You are being fobbed off and you have already told us that you have found many other people who are similarly being fobbed off and are being kept waiting by this claims management company.

 

The way to deal with it for a very rapid solution is to send a letter of claim to Amazon. After 14 days issue the papers. If there are problems with the Amazon courier then it is for Amazon to sort it out.

 

By the way, beginning a claim against Amazon will not cancel or delay any possible payment by the claims management company. If anything, someone from Amazon might get onto the courier company or the claims management company and demand to know what on earth is going on. You may find suddenly that the claims management company will pay out – although you should maintain your claim until you also receive your costs from Amazon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

they agreed to pay almost straight after we claimed which was 6 weeks ago,

they claimed that they had transferred funds to my account which they had not,

they then said that my IBAN number was wrong

 

the latest was that they would wire the money in a day or two which was a week ago,

i have contacted the amazon uk management team who are going to contact ARC claims to find out why there has been a delay

 

i am going to wait a few days and see, if i get no joy the i will try a letter of claim.

 

Thank you both very much for the advice.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't explain fully why I think bringing a small claims court against Amazon would achieve nothing. Simply it is that I can't see how Amazon would have any legal liability for the damage to OP's car. As far as I can see the Consumer Rights Act rules (in this context) only apply to the goods themselves. If the goods themselves are not delivered or are damaged by the delivery company then Amazon are liable under CRA. But that isn't what happened, the correct goods were delivered undamaged and OP has no complaint about the goods themselves.

 

The issue here is that the delivery driver negligently damaged OP's car. I do not believe consumer rights law says anything about these circumstances or makes the seller liable for the damage. (I'm no expert on CRA, happy to be corrected if I've missed it.) The delivery company is an independent contractor and under general principles of agency law Amazon would not normally be responsible for the tortious acts (ie the negligent driving) of an independent contractor.

 

Pursuing it with Amazon as a customer service complaint is an excellent idea though. Whatever the law of agency says Amazon will want to protect their reputation and are by far best placed to put pressure on the delivery company (via ARC) to pay up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't have to be the consumer rights act. The consumer rights act hasn't supplanted or replaced or amended the Common Law in any way. It simply conferred additional rights.

 

We need to get away from this fixation with the CRA. There is nothing magic about it. It is simply an extra set of rules which can be rather helpful in the right circumstances.

 

The contract with Amazon is a double contract. The principal contract is to purchase the goods and the collateral contract is to deliver them. Amazon are responsible for the delivery and also for anything that goes wrong. The most obvious way in which the delivery could go wrong is that the goods would either not arrive or would arrive damaged – but clearly there are other ways in which they could be delivery problems such as damaging the purchasers house or gate – or in this instance the motorcar.

 

I have absolutely no doubt that in this case on the basis of what we have been told there is a cause of action against Amazon and the chances of success are much better than 95%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't explain fully why I think bringing a small claims court against Amazon would achieve nothing. Simply it is that I can't see how Amazon would have any legal liability for the damage to OP's car.

 

The issue here is that the delivery driver negligently damaged OP's car.

 

The delivery company is an independent contractor and under general principles of agency law Amazon would not normally be responsible for the tortious acts (ie the negligent driving) of an independent contractor.

 

Pursuing it with Amazon as a customer service complaint is an excellent idea though. Whatever the law of agency says Amazon will want to protect their reputation and are by far best placed to put pressure on the delivery company (via ARC) to pay up.

 

Amazon tends to use it's own delivery drivers, or drivers who work through Amazon Flex, and other companies rarely (DPD/RM). I can definitely see how Amazon would be liable for the actions of those who they employ directly/indirectly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread title updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. Thanks for the update.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...