Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Custom made item, dog harness, not what I asked for & company has refused a return


Annace
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1933 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

I am new to this forum so feel free to keep me right. I feel a little bent out of shape after my dealings with an online UK company that offers harnesses for dogs:

You can find them at the web address fleece dog harnesses uk

 

 

Here is the initial email I sent the woman:

Message Body:

Hello,

I have had a challenging time trying to track down a harness for our 1 year old irish water spaniel. I have tried maybe 8/9 different models! She is still a puppy at 1- being a large breed. Irish water spaniels are slow to mature. She weighs 27kg of pure muscle and has pulled me off my feet on occasion ( running after a cat). Not only is she extremely strong and impulsive, but her skin is like lambskin- incredibly soft, particularly around the stomach, neck and chest. Conventional harnesses have caused abrasions. She has sores on her neck from her last collar. We took it off as soon as we realised. She often lies between size brackets which has made fitting more tricky. Often I order the medium, that fits her measurements according to the manufacturer’s chart but it turns out she needs the next size up. A lot of the harnesses have jutted into the back or front of her front legs. I am hoping you might be able to help. She currently uses a Hunter Norwegian Racing Harness which has been the best so far, but it is not terribly secure. She can be flighty for instance meeting a large dog or seeing a cat. She is almost able to wriggle her way out of the harness backwards. The other thing is that we really need a strong handle to keep her in check along busy roads. I will try and give you a ring tomorrow. I thought it might be helpful to send you a worded message as well since there is a lot of info!

Kind regards,

XXXXXX

 

 

I subsequently followed up with a phonecall & placed an order for a custom made harness (as advised by the lady since she said the breed is too deep-chested for highstreet harnesses) I mentioned the handle again and i was told to look at a particular page showing a flyball harness. I confirmed i needed a handle. She asked if i needed a waterproof harness. I thought about it & agreed. So i paid an exorbitant sum (£58) thinking she had taken care of all my requirements. She did not warn me that the harness was non-returnable. Furthermore, I trusted her after a lengthy conversation on the phone & all the email correspondence. I felt reassured by a note on the website saying they wanted their customers to be happy. My order note also warned me not to let the dog wear the harness before seeking a return:

( Of course, the website mentioned that custom orders were non-returnable, but I ordered by phone & paid using paypal afterwards)

 

 

Returns/Exchanges Please try your harness on but please do not wear, as worn items cannot be returned.Thanks.

I would not have paid such a huge sum for a non-returnable harness that did not meet the requirements carefully laid out in my initial email. The harness arrived, awkward to adjust, with quite scratchy fabric and exposed seams on the internal facing of the garment. I have not been able to fasten the garment around the dog’s chest yet as it is so difficult to adjust. I will have to try again to check it actually fits her. My family agrees the exposed seams will rub on the dog’s chest. There is no handle. I sent a polite email on 23rd december. The lady has finally replied today, saying she followed my requirements to the letter and that I did not request a handle, therefore a return is out of the question. I feel very let down as I was so very specific in my written brief. It is as if she paid no attention to the dog’s particular requirements. The fabric is not soft either. Any advice gratefully received.

Edited by Andyorch
Name removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and Welcome to CAG

 

Online, mail and phone order sales

 

Online, mail and telephone order customers have the right to cancel their order for a limited time even if the goods aren’t faulty. Sales of this kind are known as distance selling’.

 

Retailers must offer a refund to customers if they’ve told you within 14 days of receiving their goods that they want to cancel. They have another 14 days to return the goods once they’ve told you.

 

Retailers must refund the customer within 14 days of receiving the goods back. They don’t have to provide a reason.

 

https://www.gov.uk/accepting-returns-and-giving-refunds

 

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/3134/made

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Retailer must refund the customer within 14 days of receiving the goods back. They don’t have to provide a reason.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

I checked with the citizens advice website & learnt this does not apply to custom-made goods?

I feel conned as I laid out my requirements so carefully in my initial email. The business owner disregarded this email after reading it, for some unfathomable reason. I also feel she could/should have steered me in the direction of a softer harness (already made) with a handle at half the price which would have been subject to the cooling off period/return. I guess my only recourse is to take this up with Paypal or send a solicitor’s letter. Regards, Anna

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citizens advice are wrong.....anything bought over the internet (distance selling) you are entitled to return it with no reason providing you inform the retailer within 14 days...you then have a further 14 days to return the item...with no reason or whether its a custom item or not...(you cant return a custom item if you bought it from the actual shop.).....as that is not distance selling.

 

The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citizens Advice is right. There is no right to a cancel "goods that are made to the consumer’s specifications or are clearly personalised" unless they are faulty:

 

"28.—(1) This Part does not apply as regards the following—

 

(b)the supply of goods that are made to the consumer’s specifications or are clearly personalised;"

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/3134/regulation/28/made

 

It states that on the gov.uk website as well:

 

"You have to offer a refund for certain items only if they’re faulty, such as:

 

personalised items and custom-made items, eg curtains"

 

https://www.gov.uk/accepting-returns-and-giving-refunds

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is faulty according to the OP...her specifications were not followed.

 

Re read post #1 ...slowly

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

But that is not what you originally claimed @Andyorch. You stated that Citizens Advice was wrong and that an item could be returned within 14 days with no reason whatsoever. That is not the case with custom made items.

 

The fact that there is no handle doesn't mean it is faulty but it's not made to specifications as requested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the harness is not suitable for the dog's skin (exposed seams) and does not have the requested handle then surely that's not as ordered and can be returned for a refund.

 

As an aside can I suggest you look at this https://www.dog-games-shop.co.uk/perfect-fit-harness-size-guide

Each part of the harness can be bought in the size needed so the overall fit is correct whatever the shape and size of your dog and you can exchange any part which isn't right until you have the perfect fit. Not cheap and not waterproof but soft and doesn't rub because of a good fit and I considered mine great value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP can argue that it is not fit for purpose but there is no automatic 14 day cooling off period as with usual distance selling. She argues that the "harness that did not meet the requirements carefully laid out in my initial email."

 

However, the requirements are not carefully laid out in the e-mail. Breaking it down all she states is "The other thing is that we really need a strong handle to keep her in check along busy roads", that is the only reference to any requirement at all.

 

Then there is a subsequent phone call which if not recorded is unsubstantiated. The retailer could easily argue that a handle was discussed in the call and for whatever reason (extra cost?), the handle was deemed unwanted. The OP is unhappy with the purchase overall but relying on the fact a requested handle was not present, it is not clear cut that a handle formed part of the contract in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but her skin is like lambskin- incredibly soft, particularly around the stomach, neck and chest. Conventional harnesses have caused abrasions

That's in the email and is a known issue with some breeds. The brand I gave a link to lines the parts which could cause such a problem with fleece for this very reason. The seller accepted the commission knowing this and exposed seams are absolutely unsuitable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is a much better argument than the 'no handle' route.

Hopefully. The harness I gave a link to is roughly comparable in price and is a comparator showing the quality a buyer should get when they rely on the professional knowledge of someone who makes such a thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citizens advice are wrong.....anything bought over the internet (distance selling) you are entitled to return it with no reason providing you inform the retailer within 14 days...you then have a further 14 days to return the item...with no reason or whether its a custom item or not...(you cant return a custom item if you bought it from the actual shop.).....as that is not distance selling.

 

The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013

 

I am sorry but you may be incorrect. The item was custom made therefore cannot be returned unless proof can be shown that the harness is faulty and that is where the problem lies. The item is not faulty or not fit for purpose, but is not suitable for the dog in question.

I don't think any one will have much luck pursuing this using CRA 2015. Contract law may be better, but how do you prove what was said in a telephone conversation unless a written email of what was said was sent by either the OP or the supplier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The item is not faulty or not fit for purpose, but is not suitable for the dog in question.

Surely the whole point of a custom made item is that it should be suitable for the dog in question when the special requirements were clearly set out in the email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the whole point of a custom made item is that it should be suitable for the dog in question when the special requirements were clearly set out in the email.

 

This is clearly absolutely correct.

 

Fitness of purpose means that an item must be fit for its usual purpose or where a particular or specific purpose has been drawn to the attention of the retailer and the item has been sold on that basis that it must be fit for that specified purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is clearly absolutely correct.

 

Fitness of purpose means that an item must be fit for its usual purpose or where a particular or specific purpose has been drawn to the attention of the retailer and the item has been sold on that basis that it must be fit for that specified purpose.

 

Without anything in writing I don't think the OP stands any chance of a refund plus the fact proving it is not fit for purpose would be extremely difficult. The harness may be perfect on another dog of the same breed that has had training.

IMHO no matter what harness is bought, custom or standard, it may never be fit for purpose. The OP would be better off spending money on taking the dog for training so that it does not strain against the harness or decide to chase cats.

This type of dog should be trained to walk alongside the owner and not on a lead. The dog is let off the lead to retrieve game therefore needs training big time and as soon as possible! Once trained there should be no more issues with any harness. I would have thought the OP knew this before they purchased the puppy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but now you are changing the subject completely. In terms of the absence of writing or other proof, you are shifting away from discussing the law in relation to "fitness for purpose" to the question of evidence.

 

Nobody would dispute that you need some kind of evidence to prove your point – but up until now you have been disputing what is the law on this matter.

 

In terms of advising the OP on what they should do with their money, that is also sidestepping away from the issue which was originally raised in the opening post to this thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but now you are changing the subject completely. In terms of the absence of writing or other proof, you are shifting away from discussing the law in relation to "fitness for purpose" to the question of evidence.

 

Nobody would dispute that you need some kind of evidence to prove your point – but up until now you have been disputing what is the law on this matter.

 

In terms of advising the OP on what they should do with their money, that is also sidestepping away from the issue which was originally raised in the opening post to this thread.

 

I think that if you check you will find that I am correct due to the article being custom made, proving it is not fit for purpose etc as the item may be perfectly okay on another Irish water dog of the same size. The OP will have a hard time proving their case to get any sort of a refund. It all seems that there is no paper trail either so we need the OP to confirm if there is a paper trail detailing the specifications of the harness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without anything in writing I don't think the OP stands any chance of a refund plus the fact proving it is not fit for purpose would be extremely difficult. The harness may be perfect on another dog of the same breed that has had training.

That argument suggests that any harness, however badly designed/made, would be fit for purpose as long as the dog only ever walked perfectly on a loose lead. What about when they're off lead and running? Is it OK for exposed seams to rub the dog's skin then? This was clearly addressed in the OP's original email so it isn't true there's nothing in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That argument suggests that any harness, however badly designed/made, would be fit for purpose as long as the dog only ever walked perfectly on a loose lead. What about when they're off lead and running? Is it OK for exposed seams to rub the dog's skin then? This was clearly addressed in the OP's original email so it isn't true there's nothing in writing.

 

The initial inquiry was made by email and then followed up by a phone call. At that point the order was placed however the OP has not confirm whether there was anything in writing from that point forward. Until there is a picture of the "exposed" seams I cannot comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...