Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car sold with Mileage Discrepancy


Chad8877
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1899 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

just want some feedback with regards to where I stand,

 

I purchased my car in October 2016 from a reputable car supermarket.

The car had 103k miles on it at the time and I purchased it for £7000.

 

I took finance through a company and have had the car for 26 months now.

I have 10 payments left before car is mine.

 

Today I wanted to go car shopping and thought I would go and have a look at a few cars and see what price I would get for mine.

I visited a garage and they began to put a valuation onto my car

 

after doing so the guy came back to me and said sorry we cannot have your car as it has a mileage discrepancy.

I am not aware of this

 

I asked to see there hpi report that he produced.

 

In August 2015 it went for mot and had 76k on it.

It then went to the manufacturer for whatever reason in Jan 2016 and the car had 126k on it,

it then went back to the manufacturer for work in May 2016 and it had 95k

then it had a mot in August 2016 at 100k before it was sold to me in October 2016.

 

Am I legally entitled to fight this case ?

 

as though it has been 2 years I never knew of this and if I had I wouldn’t have purchased the vehicle.

I am now stuck as no one will buy my vehicle with mileage discrepancy on even though the garage who sold it to me did not declare anything to me.

 

I have all invoices at time of sale and it has the mileage what was on car at time of sale.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that an entry mistake was made when the vehicle went to the 'manufacturer' in January 2016. Does it look as if it could have travelled 50,000 miles in the 5 months since its Mot in August?

 

You need to take it to the manufacturer's franchise dealer to have its history checked as it could be that this visit and that in May, were for a recall.

 

They may well have servicing history as well to show that this January figure is an anomaly.

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car was a fleet car so at the moment that cannot be ruled out. If it was in fact a mistake but do the company who I purchased it from aware of this prior to selling it to me as they clearly stated hpi clear and gave me a print out of page 1 of the hpi and not both pages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What car and year is it

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that an entry mistake was made when the vehicle went to the 'manufacturer' in January 2016. Does it look as if it could have travelled 50,000 miles in the 5 months since its Mot in August?

 

You need to take it to the manufacturer's franchise dealer to have its history checked as it could be that this visit and that in May, were for a recall.

 

They may well have servicing history as well to show that this January figure is an anomaly.

This would not be relevant to the question of whether or not there was a breach.

 

On the basis of what you say, they are in breach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The retailer you purchased it from had a responsibility to tell you if there was a discrepancy. When HPI checks are performed they can check the mileage aswell, you will be able to find out from HPI whether they checked the mileage and chose NOT to tell you.

 

A mileage discrepancy will always put a cloud over the genuineness of car and reduced its value considerably.

 

I would contact the retailer (be nice) and explain your situation, put it in writing aswell. Tell them you want them to clarify the mileage. You want written clarification from the owner at the time that the mileage is correct... And you want the discrepancy removed from the database.

 

If they cannot oblige the above you have every right to reject the car for being fundamentally NOT as described.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that in Jan 2016 the car had 126k miles, then went down to 95k.

So possibly the 126k figure was wrongly recorded by VW.

To remedy, ask them to run a vag-com history log which would highlight any "clocking".

I bet they simply took the wrong reading.

They can amend their records to reflect this, but it should be free to you.

So go to the VW garage that did the work in Jan 2016 and ask them to run their software on the car.

If they changed oil and reset the counter, this should be recorded in the log and correct mileage would be there.

This would be the case for any other work which involved plugging the vag-com in, so virtually everything nowadays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that in Jan 2016 the car had 126k miles, then went down to 95k.

So possibly the 126k figure was wrongly recorded by VW.

To remedy, ask them to run a vag-com history log which would highlight any "clocking".

I bet they simply took the wrong reading.

They can amend their records to reflect this, but it should be free to you.

So go to the VW garage that did the work in Jan 2016 and ask them to run their software on the car.

If they changed oil and reset the counter, this should be recorded in the log and correct mileage would be there.

This would be the case for any other work which involved plugging the vag-com in, so virtually everything nowadays.

 

this sounds like a very sensible solution if it can be done completely at the supplier's expense and you come away with a completely clean slate.

If not, then we will help you to consider some suitable action

Link to post
Share on other sites

After thinking about it logically and how this is starting to pan out I’ve come to the conclusion that this cannot be a mistake, they were simply not aware that when the vehicle went to the main dealer for whatever reason the party who had the car at the time did not realise that the mileage would be recorded and probably still don’t know what happened. Definitely a clocking issue, there’s no mistake in that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you may well be right but as there has now been suggested a way to verify whether or not it is a mistake or a reclocking problem, you need to do this and then come back to you and we can advise as to what action to take

Link to post
Share on other sites

I repeat my post at #2 Now we know that it is a Golf, Go to ANY VAG dealer/service centre who will be able to interrogate the vehicle.

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

There yer go!

 

Get them to contact HPI for a correction or addition of explanatory note.

Edited by Gick
additions

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical Motor Trade.

 

Guilty until proven innocent.

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...