Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Neighbours complaint about trees


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

My brother-in-law received a lengthy report, from assesors acting for insurers, staing that his trees in the back garden had caused subsidence to his neighbour extention. A complete nonsense as the trees are tiny. My brother in law commisioned his own report which stated that the complaint was utter rubbish - mentioning poor quality build of the extension = basically the claim was frivillous and vexatious.

 

The assesors have now written back stating:

 

I have been advised that, as the level of damage occurring to our insured property is slight, and, taking into account the lack of evidence to support the OCA Report recommendations, at this present time your vegetation removal is no longer required.

However, you are placed On Notice of future risk. This means that although your vegetation is no longer requested for removal it has been implicated and therefore must be considered as a future risk. Whilst you have advised you will not be mitigating at this present time you may give consideration to taking some action in the future to prevent any further possible damage occurring to our insured property by your vegetation.

My file on this matter is now closed and I thank you for your time in dealing.

 

Tree Mitigation Specialist

Oriel Services Limited

Oakleigh House, 14-16 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3DQ, GB

 

 

My brother-in-law clearly doesn't want the threat hanging over him, having to mention this to his own future insurers, but is not sure how he should respond to counter this - any ideas please? Perhaps respond that his neighbours are also on notice of their vexatious complaint, or something.. basically put up or shut up.

 

Regards

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

In other words they knew from the start that the trees were not the problem and tried to sc@m you.

Write back to them saying that potentially their gas cooker could explode.

this has now been implicated and therefore must be considered as a future risk.

Use their same words to take them for a ride.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to do anything more than answer insurance questions truly.

If they ask specifically about trees you tell them.

The standard question is: "is there any tree taller than 5 metre within 10 metres of the property?" or something similar.

The answer is yes or no.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought some kind of survey would have been required prior to the extension being built (if it was built after the trees had grown).

 

The response from the Insurers sounds as though they are just trying to 'save face' because you decided to commission your own report which kind of blew theirs out of the water.

  • Confused 1

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some trees were there before, some afterwards. They are small, not sure of the type, but they have had no impact on the wall seperating the properties so the claim was really unfounded.

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

Thanks Honeybee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks King12345, the neighbours have huge conifers in their front garden that have appeared to have caused some cracking to their own front wall - I think I'll put them on notice of that :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The third party Insurers or the company acting for them, have every right to give notice about risk presented by trees in a garden.

 

Your B-I-L's only responsibility is to take reasonable precautions, by maintaining his garden. He has to be careful, as say three years down the line, the neighbours Insurers start litigation for further subsidence damage and he gets his Home Insurers involved, as he will have liability cover under his Home policy. The Home Insurers may say that they were not made aware of the previous correspondence, so they won't help, because they had no chance to review the situation.

 

I would suggest your BIL sends copies of all correspondence including the reports and photos of the garden to his current Home Insurers. If the neighbour has trees which present a relevant issue, perhaps send pictures of those as well.

 

Making the current Home Insurers aware of this, may prove very useful, for the reason given. Also if your BIL makes them aware, then if a future Insurers asks him whether he notified his Insurers and if so, what did they do, then he can answer this.

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The third party Insurers or the company acting for them, have every right to give notice about risk presented by trees in a garden.

 

Your B-I-L's only responsibility is to take reasonable precautions, by maintaining his garden. He has to be careful, as say three years down the line, the neighbours Insurers start litigation for further subsidence damage and he gets his Home Insurers involved, as he will have liability cover under his Home policy. The Home Insurers may say that they were not made aware of the previous correspondence, so they won't help, because they had no chance to review the situation.

 

I would suggest your BIL sends copies of all correspondence including the reports and photos of the garden to his current Home Insurers. If the neighbour has trees which present a relevant issue, perhaps send pictures of those as well.

 

Making the current Home Insurers aware of this, may prove very useful, for the reason given. Also if your BIL makes them aware, then if a future Insurers asks him whether he notified his Insurers and if so, what did they do, then he can answer this.

 

That's perfect, thanks. The small tress in my brother-in-laws garden won't get any bigger. However, I have responded with your suggested reply about their much larger conifers in their clients front garden that appear to have caused some damage to their clients own property - putting them on notice. Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW if the house goes on sale the "Notice of future risk" will need to be declared to any potential buyer and this may affect the value of the property. I would tell the insurers that before they put any such notice I would want them to carry out a full investigation at their expense. I am not sure but perhaps they could be taken them to court to remove the Notice if they keep the Notice but do not do a survey?

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW if the house goes on sale the "Notice of future risk" will need to be declared to any potential buyer and this may affect the value of the property. I would tell the insurers that before they put any such notice I would want them to carry out a full investigation at their expense. I am not sure but perhaps they could be taken them to court to remove the Notice if they keep the Notice but do not do a survey?

 

Excellent advise, that I shall follow, thanks again.

 

Best regards

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

also let them know that their statements are reckless, frivolous and vexatious and copy your letters to all parties. This will then make anyone look carefully at any claim in the future.

Send a copy of your report and this letter to the professional body that oversees the assessors and make a compl;ain about the same. Again that wil make it harder for them to dig this up later unless they can show that it was investigated and their bloke suddenly proved to have a valid point ( not just his word). Find out the species of the trees and do a search on the local drift geology to see what the normal soil and subsoil types are. Council or library should have some suitable scale maps.

 

This sort of garbage is normal for insurers looking to play pass the buck

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

also let them know that their statements are reckless, frivolous and vexatious and copy your letters to all parties. This will then make anyone look carefully at any claim in the future.

Send a copy of your report and this letter to the professional body that oversees the assessors and make a compl;ain about the same. Again that wil make it harder for them to dig this up later unless they can show that it was investigated and their bloke suddenly proved to have a valid point ( not just his word). Find out the species of the trees and do a search on the local drift geology to see what the normal soil and subsoil types are. Council or library should have some suitable scale maps.

 

This sort of garbage is normal for insurers looking to play pass the buck

 

That's great, thanks very much ericsbrother, really useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...