Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help drowning in debt


mad man
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am currently £13,100 in debt.

Some run up by my son on my credit cards and some by me while manic(suffer from Schizoaffective disorder).

 

Up to now I have been using all my disability money (esa and dla) on paying towards the debts instead of the care I need so have been relying on my mum to do the caring but she is 80 and it is a strain on her.

 

I am trying to address the debts so I can pay my sister to do the caring instead and relieve my mum.

 

The problem is my creditors seem to think that my DLA and ESA should be used to pay then so it looks like I have got plenty of money.

 

I have tried explaining I need to pay for care but it is falling on deaf ears. Social services have said they cant help because my money should be going on care and not paying debts.

 

I would like to go bankrupt or a debt relief order but was wondering if they also would say I have too much income?

 

Any thoughts.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you start off by listing out your debts here. Including the creditor, whether the debt has been put into the hands of the debt collector or if it has been sold on, how much money is owing, when the debt was incurred, when was the last time you paid any money into the debt.

 

Also, do you have any assets? Do you own your own house? If you have no assets then bankruptcy could be a good way to go – but although you may think that £13,000 is a lot of money, it's probably small beer compared to some of the problems that we get on this forum.

 

List it out here and people will be able to understand what the situation is and start to give you advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

I am looking to ruin my credit as I don't want anyone to let me get credit in the future.

 

I do have a notice of correction on my credit files from 2008 telling lenders not to lend to me because of my severe mental health problems but that obviously did not make any difference.

 

I don't own my own home.

I don't have a car and I don't have any expensive assets.

 

My main question is can my creditors insist on me using my DLA and ESA on paying them instead of the care I need.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can't insist on that. You will have priority debts and priority expenses and your own personal welfare will come first.

 

However, you should follow the advice I have given you which is to list out your debts because it may well be that some of them are not enforceable for one reason or another.

 

Also the notice based on your file in 2008 is very interesting because if the lenders have ignored that then you may well have a good case for saying that the lending was irresponsible. This could be a good basis for rendering them unenforceable – if necessary with the help of the financials and service.

 

Please follow the advice here. You have come here for help and we can give you the best help if you allow us to guide you as to what information to give us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to go bankrupt or a debt relief order but was wondering if they also would say I have too much income? Any thoughts.

 

There is no point in going bankrupt if you are eligible for a DRO. As you are in receipt of ESA and PIP, it is unlikely that you are left with more than £50 per month disposable income. Your PIP would generally be offset to compensate for your disabilities leaving ESA only and that will not usually provide £50 of disposable income. You would then have to meet the criteria of owning no property and no assets worth over £1000, a Motability vehicle does not count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

|Lots of avenues open right now. Forget about Bankruptcy, IVA/DRO. Theyre a last resort and a far off goal.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please list your debts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My debts are the following:-

 

virgin £4,900 Taken out March 18. Been up to date until now

 

Barclaycard £2,800 Taken out July 17 Been up to date until now

 

MBNA £2,300 Taken out Sept 18 Been up to date

 

Sainsburys £1,150 Taken out Sept 18 Been up to date

 

Marks and Spencers Taken out Sept 18 Been up to date

 

Tesco Taken out Sept 18 been up to date

 

Sky Mobile Taken out July 17 defaulted in Sept and being threatened with debt collection agency.

 

Parents £1,000

 

A lot of the debt was with Barclaycard (£8,500) and I was struggling to keep paying as the interest was something like 19% so I did some balance transfers to Virgin and MBNA.

 

Sorry forgot to say amount on the following:-

M & S £860

Tesco £690

 

Sky Mobile £400

 

I hope this helps.

 

Thank you everyone who have replied.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

so most of this has been taken out [consumer credit debt] in the last 2 yrs?

 

the priority here is your parents debt

forget about the morality card..oh I owe these creditors x amount of money, parents 1st.

 

in the debt collection section of our library is a pro-rata letter

send each creditors one of those

if they don't help [which they must under industry guidelines] you drop them to £1PCM.

 

as for debt collectors..they are powerless and not bailiffs

 

shame you switched to balance transfers and wiped the old debts out that way.

 

what were the debts you cleared by this method and when from?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would certainly agree that the lenders need to take some blame here as most of this debt has been taken out over the last 2 years and would certainly have been recorded on your credit file.. Have you checked to see if the Notice of correction is still visible to lenders ? It is my understanding this only lasts for 90 days and you might have needed to update it regularly, certainly at least once a year I would have thought.

 

As advised - use the letter that dx has linked you to - offer them £1.00 per month.

 

I suspect that lenders are not allowed to use your dla/esa/PIP to repay debts.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may find the Money Advice Liaison Group's guidelines on mental health and debt useful when dealing with creditors.

 

Schizoaffective disorder is a serious mental health condition - creditors should be treating you as vulnerable, not trying to take your benefits.

 

My suggestion is that you speak to your CPN or other mental healthcare professional, and ask them to complete National Debtline's Debt & Mental Health Evidence Form that you can then send to your creditors. It should take the pressure off and stop them chasing you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...