Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1922 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

nhs contracts?

Hi all,

 

i am now working in the nhs as part of the theatre department and in doing so signed the usual contract agreeing to working on calls, late shifts and weekends etc,

the problem is that some staff are not taking part in this arrangement because of various reasons

( my cats scared of the dark or little johnny wets the bed) sanctioned by the managers and therefore the remaining staff are having to work extra shifts to compensate.

 

My question is, are we all being treated equally and do we have any basis for taking action against the management.

 

Any help would be great.

Cheers.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

 

What action(s) would you like to take against management?

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , thanks for your quick replies.

i will ring acas if it gets to the stage where i need mediation or advice

 

in the mean time i'm trying to work out how many extra on calls i am doing over the coming year compared to others.

My manager is close to retirement (this year) and doesn't give a flying one for anybody, she says its not up to her what shifts staff get.

 

Ideally i would like to kick all the managers off their gravy train if i could prove bias or malice toward me through legal action,

lets not forget that all these on calls mean that i have to stay at the hospital overnight wich means i spend less time with my family than other employees and its not fair,

so if legal action is what it takes so be it.

 

Thanks for your input.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi Everyone,

I work at a large childrens hospital in theatres,

new managers have recently come in to make savings and improve services (which we are all for)

 

the problem is that they have split the shifts into two, long days and short days but both shifts still covering 37.5 hours per week, and each staff member could choose which shift would suit them, great so far.

 

The problem is that after we have made our choices and the new shifts have started it transpires that the short days shift has to cover weekend emergencies and also weekday/evening emergencies, this means that those doing short days are being forced into overtime that would normally be spread between all staff members.

 

They did not give us this information before we made our choices so is ther anything in employment law about this?

 

Any help or advice would be gratefully appreciated by the whole theatre team.

 

Cheers xxorlsxx

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really. I am assuming that this has been necessitated by working time regulations which prevent the "long days" from doing shifts of a certain length and overtime. But presumably they may be just as annoyed at loosing the right to get overtime? I would suggest a collective grievance - through the union if you have one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply,

It is true that people are upset at losing overtime but it's also the fact that people are also having to work longer to compensate, we wern't informed of this so we couldn't make the right choice for our needs.

 

I think your right about a mass greivence through the union as our contracts say that we are entitled to a full consultation on any working time changes.

 

I dont think we had enough information to choose the best shift pattern for our individual needs so it could be a breach of contract perhaps.

 

Thanks for your help,

 

xxorlsxx

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

i work at a major hospital in the theatre dept,

for years when working past 1am up till 8am we have been claiming double time and this payment is known as "sleep time" this has been going on for years now,

 

we have recently had a new manager who is saying that because she can find no written agreement on this payment that we have been making fraudulent claims and that they are going to end this payment.

 

Firstly if they have been paying us for so many years is'nt it now contractual?

and secondly if they cant prove fraud then they must continue payment?

 

Any help would be great Thanks.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to know who authorized the first payment, then go from there.

 

Not sure when it becomes an implied part of your contract will have to look that up. How many years, exactly, have you been receiving this?

  • Confused 1

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no specified time in which an event becomes customary, but the more extended the time period, the more likely a Tribunal would be prepared to agree that the employer has been happy to allow it to become customary.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your quick replies,

we have been getting this payment for at least ten years now,

 

the manager who is trying to block it says that she can find no agreement or who authorized any such payment,

the most upsetting thing is being accused of fraud,

most of my department are not in a union but i am and have contacted my rep for help on this matter.

 

The nhs has a dedicated fraud office and i can't understand why they are not investigating this,

if it is fraud which i don't believe it is then the money must be paid back and i would be happy to do this,

 

personally i think the managers are trying to scare us into giving up this payment whithout a fight.

 

Any thoughts would help as we are already understaffed and its getting worse.

 

Thanks.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

There's an NHS forum here. Although I usually move employment queries to this forum, it might be worth putting a brief description of your problem there, with a link to this thread. Please don't start a duplicate thread or we'll both be in trouble. :)

 

You might find other people with experience of this, you never know.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it has been 10 years then a tribunal i think would find that it is an implied term of contract.

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this has been officially authorised then I would have thought that a written contract has been made at some point. You should have a copy of this... or perhaps those that came in to the unit will have some sort of written record of this. You have to be open among your collegues and discuss this.

 

It is entirely possible that there has been a 'cull' of your personnel files to remove any such record but as I say one of you must have some sort of paperwork on it. Surely this is highlighted on payslips??????

 

If it has been paid for such a long period of time then and no official record was made of it then you will have to rely on a historic implied terms and condition to your contracts.

 

ANY change to working conditions MUST be discussed with those involved either personally or through a Union rep (and that does NOT mean the local rep who is probably not qualified to do so and 'in the pay' of the hospital) Get on to Union Regional HQ and get this issue discussed on a formal level ..... that is why they are there and why you pay your dues. These things must be done in writing and full disclosure followed.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks papasmurf,

this payment is on our payslip as unsocial enhancement as is all payment after 8pm,

but is not highlighted as after 1am to 8am,

the manager is adamant that there is no written record but i will make my own enquiries with payroll and HR,

 

i will get in touch with the unison area rep asap and take this forward,

we have three memebers of staff negotiating with the managers but are getting nowhere fast as they are determined to cut wages at any cost.

I will post any updates as they happen.

 

thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not quite clear as to why there is a difference between the enhanced rates after 8pm (night duty enhancement) and the 1 am to 8 am rate ? Why is it 'sleep time'? Is there a further enhancement after this time ie 1am? I am supposing that this only gets paid if an operation goes past 1am ie a time you should be off duty and at home asleep. Can you try and clarify this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you actually on duty during "sleep time" or is it that you are on call, or what is it?

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ,

our normal hours are from 8am to 6pm and we work 4 days per week,

but when we are rostered to do a late shift it starts at 2,30pm and we work untill midnight and we are paid an enhanced rate from 8pm till midnight,

 

if there is no other emergencies we go home but are on call from midnight till 8am the following day,

so if we do work from midnight till 8am this is technically our day off and the rest of the day you really need your bed,

so sleep time payment is to compensate you for having to spend your day off in bed.

 

hope that helps.

 

thanks for all your advice so far.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me then that you have a good case. Even if there is no paperwork anywhere from any of the staff or the employer, then custom and practice dictates that they have paid you for the benefit of calling you should they need you, you are not free to do what you want, if you refused they would discipline you. The manager is probably trying to make savings and that is an easy target.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

i work at a major childrens hospital and we have to work on calls and weekends,

 

i have started working in an area where the other workers are not rostered on these shifts but i am expected to carry on working these on calls and weekends,

 

is this fair?

Any comments are very welcome

 

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be. do they all have formal flexible working requests in place and you don't maybe?

 

what does the boss say?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...