Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1918 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

nhs contracts?

Hi all,

 

i am now working in the nhs as part of the theatre department and in doing so signed the usual contract agreeing to working on calls, late shifts and weekends etc,

the problem is that some staff are not taking part in this arrangement because of various reasons

( my cats scared of the dark or little johnny wets the bed) sanctioned by the managers and therefore the remaining staff are having to work extra shifts to compensate.

 

My question is, are we all being treated equally and do we have any basis for taking action against the management.

 

Any help would be great.

Cheers.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

 

What action(s) would you like to take against management?

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , thanks for your quick replies.

i will ring acas if it gets to the stage where i need mediation or advice

 

in the mean time i'm trying to work out how many extra on calls i am doing over the coming year compared to others.

My manager is close to retirement (this year) and doesn't give a flying one for anybody, she says its not up to her what shifts staff get.

 

Ideally i would like to kick all the managers off their gravy train if i could prove bias or malice toward me through legal action,

lets not forget that all these on calls mean that i have to stay at the hospital overnight wich means i spend less time with my family than other employees and its not fair,

so if legal action is what it takes so be it.

 

Thanks for your input.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi Everyone,

I work at a large childrens hospital in theatres,

new managers have recently come in to make savings and improve services (which we are all for)

 

the problem is that they have split the shifts into two, long days and short days but both shifts still covering 37.5 hours per week, and each staff member could choose which shift would suit them, great so far.

 

The problem is that after we have made our choices and the new shifts have started it transpires that the short days shift has to cover weekend emergencies and also weekday/evening emergencies, this means that those doing short days are being forced into overtime that would normally be spread between all staff members.

 

They did not give us this information before we made our choices so is ther anything in employment law about this?

 

Any help or advice would be gratefully appreciated by the whole theatre team.

 

Cheers xxorlsxx

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really. I am assuming that this has been necessitated by working time regulations which prevent the "long days" from doing shifts of a certain length and overtime. But presumably they may be just as annoyed at loosing the right to get overtime? I would suggest a collective grievance - through the union if you have one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply,

It is true that people are upset at losing overtime but it's also the fact that people are also having to work longer to compensate, we wern't informed of this so we couldn't make the right choice for our needs.

 

I think your right about a mass greivence through the union as our contracts say that we are entitled to a full consultation on any working time changes.

 

I dont think we had enough information to choose the best shift pattern for our individual needs so it could be a breach of contract perhaps.

 

Thanks for your help,

 

xxorlsxx

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

i work at a major hospital in the theatre dept,

for years when working past 1am up till 8am we have been claiming double time and this payment is known as "sleep time" this has been going on for years now,

 

we have recently had a new manager who is saying that because she can find no written agreement on this payment that we have been making fraudulent claims and that they are going to end this payment.

 

Firstly if they have been paying us for so many years is'nt it now contractual?

and secondly if they cant prove fraud then they must continue payment?

 

Any help would be great Thanks.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to know who authorized the first payment, then go from there.

 

Not sure when it becomes an implied part of your contract will have to look that up. How many years, exactly, have you been receiving this?

  • Confused 1

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no specified time in which an event becomes customary, but the more extended the time period, the more likely a Tribunal would be prepared to agree that the employer has been happy to allow it to become customary.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your quick replies,

we have been getting this payment for at least ten years now,

 

the manager who is trying to block it says that she can find no agreement or who authorized any such payment,

the most upsetting thing is being accused of fraud,

most of my department are not in a union but i am and have contacted my rep for help on this matter.

 

The nhs has a dedicated fraud office and i can't understand why they are not investigating this,

if it is fraud which i don't believe it is then the money must be paid back and i would be happy to do this,

 

personally i think the managers are trying to scare us into giving up this payment whithout a fight.

 

Any thoughts would help as we are already understaffed and its getting worse.

 

Thanks.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

There's an NHS forum here. Although I usually move employment queries to this forum, it might be worth putting a brief description of your problem there, with a link to this thread. Please don't start a duplicate thread or we'll both be in trouble. :)

 

You might find other people with experience of this, you never know.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it has been 10 years then a tribunal i think would find that it is an implied term of contract.

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this has been officially authorised then I would have thought that a written contract has been made at some point. You should have a copy of this... or perhaps those that came in to the unit will have some sort of written record of this. You have to be open among your collegues and discuss this.

 

It is entirely possible that there has been a 'cull' of your personnel files to remove any such record but as I say one of you must have some sort of paperwork on it. Surely this is highlighted on payslips??????

 

If it has been paid for such a long period of time then and no official record was made of it then you will have to rely on a historic implied terms and condition to your contracts.

 

ANY change to working conditions MUST be discussed with those involved either personally or through a Union rep (and that does NOT mean the local rep who is probably not qualified to do so and 'in the pay' of the hospital) Get on to Union Regional HQ and get this issue discussed on a formal level ..... that is why they are there and why you pay your dues. These things must be done in writing and full disclosure followed.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks papasmurf,

this payment is on our payslip as unsocial enhancement as is all payment after 8pm,

but is not highlighted as after 1am to 8am,

the manager is adamant that there is no written record but i will make my own enquiries with payroll and HR,

 

i will get in touch with the unison area rep asap and take this forward,

we have three memebers of staff negotiating with the managers but are getting nowhere fast as they are determined to cut wages at any cost.

I will post any updates as they happen.

 

thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not quite clear as to why there is a difference between the enhanced rates after 8pm (night duty enhancement) and the 1 am to 8 am rate ? Why is it 'sleep time'? Is there a further enhancement after this time ie 1am? I am supposing that this only gets paid if an operation goes past 1am ie a time you should be off duty and at home asleep. Can you try and clarify this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you actually on duty during "sleep time" or is it that you are on call, or what is it?

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ,

our normal hours are from 8am to 6pm and we work 4 days per week,

but when we are rostered to do a late shift it starts at 2,30pm and we work untill midnight and we are paid an enhanced rate from 8pm till midnight,

 

if there is no other emergencies we go home but are on call from midnight till 8am the following day,

so if we do work from midnight till 8am this is technically our day off and the rest of the day you really need your bed,

so sleep time payment is to compensate you for having to spend your day off in bed.

 

hope that helps.

 

thanks for all your advice so far.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me then that you have a good case. Even if there is no paperwork anywhere from any of the staff or the employer, then custom and practice dictates that they have paid you for the benefit of calling you should they need you, you are not free to do what you want, if you refused they would discipline you. The manager is probably trying to make savings and that is an easy target.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

i work at a major childrens hospital and we have to work on calls and weekends,

 

i have started working in an area where the other workers are not rostered on these shifts but i am expected to carry on working these on calls and weekends,

 

is this fair?

Any comments are very welcome

 

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be. do they all have formal flexible working requests in place and you don't maybe?

 

what does the boss say?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...