Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Documents arrived today dated 27th March.  This is a cc taken out a long time ago (2008) and they don't seem to have been able to provide a copy of a CCA agreement, just reams of print outs of lines of texts from old bank statements, default notices etc.   
    • Documents finally arrived today from PRA group.  New day have sent me lots of paperwork, copies of default letters and statements, print out of what looks like a CCA that would have been completed on online, IP address as signature.  This debt is not too old, so possible this is the true copy of agreement ?  Not sure what my defence would be beyond irresponsible lending. 
    • pers i wouldn't.. all you need to know is in the posts of that thread....that being section 127(3) of the CCA refers. if under a CCA return, the 'creditor' claims its a recon, it must not contain any details like a sig, tickbox, or typed name (whether you signed physically or by online tickbox) 1. those are not necessary in a recon, so why inc them? (faked??) 2, it cant thus be a recon!!, it must be a copy of the 'original' from the original creditor, not from a debt buyers filing cabinet. they shouldn't not be 'mixing' some original docs from the OC with crap from their filing cabinet, claiming its ALL a recon! because some of it is faked. just remember there are far more docs like NOA and a DN that are as equally important to a court claim of 'this debt is enforceable'. never rely solely upon the dodgy agreement argument.
    • India has thousands of small gold refineries which are facing more competition from big players.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

WDA - irresponsible lending


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1950 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a roll over loan with WDA

29/11/2010 Amount £200 (actual amount £185 charged £15 for direct payment) Repay £250

20/12/2010 £250 Repay £312.5

Jan 2011 Can not find details.

28/02/2011 £350 Repay £437.5

 

After reading another forum (sorry) that’s associated to the guy on TV (He spoke about reclaiming), I went through Resolver for an IR claim.

 

I had multiple loans (Pay Day Express, MyJar, LendingStream, CFO, CashChoice, MrLender, Speede) so I was using one to pay the other etc – got myself into a right mess

 

With WDA – I tried multiple times to contact them to arrange payment plan but emails got ignored – they passed it to two agencies – latter being MMF.

 

 

Well – had my Final Response today on the Resolver site:

 

I write further to my last update to advise we are now in a position to provide a final response to you about your complaint.

Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns.

I would like to assure you that we take all issues raised in relation to your case very seriously and having reviewed your case I now set out my conclusions below.

 

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND RELEVANT FACTS:

 

Complaint details:

You have raised a complaint because, in summary, you believe that Wage Day Advance should never have lent to you based on your circumstances at the time you took your loans as these were unaffordable and as such, we lent irresponsibly.

Your lending history with Wage Day Advance:

Please find a summary of your loans at Appendix A.

((Nothing attached as itÂ’s via Resolver website..))

 

DECISION

Having reviewed our records, we note that all your loans were granted over six years ago and are considered as being time barred.

 

As an online lender, we believe we provided ample information in relation to the loan application and income and expenditure process, along with information on how to contact us if you were experiencing difficulties and how to make a complaint.

 

In addition to this, there has been a high level of media coverage relating to payday loans since 2013 and, therefore, we believe it is fair to conclude that you should have reasonably been aware you had the opportunity to raise a complaint sooner.

 

Having reviewed your complaint we do not believe that there is evidence of exceptional circumstances that prevented you from bringing this to our attention within the relevant time frame and therefore will not consider whether any redress would be due in respect of the above points.

 

If you have any additional information you believe we should consider that may change our decision, and can confirm why, in view of the media focus and reporting on the payday lending sector since 2013, you believe you were unaware of the issues and your option to raise a complaint at that time, please feel free to provide this for our consideration.

 

OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION

 

Due to non-payment on your final loan, the account was sold to Lantern (formerly known as Motor Mile Finance Ltd) and they are now the legal owners of the debt.

 

As we have completed our investigation into your complaint, we have instructed Lantern that normal collections activity may resume.

 

We hope the reasoning and decisions set out in this letter resolves the complaint to your satisfaction.

Please note that this is our final decision based on the information you have provided and what we hold on our records.

 

Whilst writing to you, I must let you know that you have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge.

If you do decide to refer your complaint to the Ombudsman you must do so within six months of the date of this letter.

 

The Ombudsman might not be able to consider your complaint if:

 

• What you’re complaining about happened more than six years ago, and

• You’re complaining more than three years after you realised (or should have realised) that there was a problem.

 

We think that your complaint was made outside of these time limits and because of this the Ombudsman does not have our permission to consider your complaint. It is feasible that the Ombudsman may disagree with our view and decide to review it however, they will only be able to do so in very limited and exceptional circumstances.

 

I have enclosed with this letter a copy of the Financial Ombudsman Service standard leaflet. More information can also be found on their website, www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk. If you have received this letter by email, I am unable to enclose the Financial Ombudsman Service standard leaflet, however this can be found at: http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/consumer-leaflet.htm.

 

 

((Nothing attached as it’s via Resolver website..))

 

Thank you for taking the time to contact us and for allowing me to carry out a full investigation.

Yours sincerely

Adrienn Szollosi

 

 

 

Now they have said that they’ve now told MMF to come after me again – this dropped off Credit File as it was 6yrs

 

As you can see they even stating that I cant go to FOS and they don’t give permission.

Is this correct? I’ve read different posts say I can not and some say that the FOS will take intrest into the likes of WDA for 6+yrs…

 

Can anyone offer some advice, point me in the right direction.

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

shame on you

we have our own reclaiming guide..

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?472423-CAG-PDL-Reclaim-Guide-Indepth-Step-By-Step

 

stop using resolver!!

 

anyway..

 

its when you realised not their silly time limits.

 

when was you last payment too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why were you blindly paying mmf without checking?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why were you blindly paying mmf without checking?

 

I was foolish.

Thought it was right thing to do at the time.

Then learnt more about DCAs having not much power..

 

Guess you learn by your mistakes

 

I should still be able to.go after wDA via the FOS, shouldn't I?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...