Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice needed regarding Police questioning


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1954 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

ive received a phone call today from the police stating that they want to come to my house and talk to me about an issue, a serious one.

 

Question is, do I allow this or do I insist that it is recorded and that I am represented by a solicitor? Would that be in my best interests?

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers id co-operate.

 

it will prob be recorded by their body cameras anyway

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

ive received a phone call today from the police stating that they want to come to my house and talk to me about an issue, a serious one.

 

Question is, do I allow this or do I insist that it is recorded and that I am represented by a solicitor? Would that be in my best interests?

 

Thank you.

 

It depends.

Ask them if they wish you only to be interviewed as a witness to a serious matter, or are a suspect in a serious matter.

 

If the latter : would you want free legal advice or pay your own solicitor?

If the latter ask your solicitor

 

If you would want to have the free legal advice from the duty representative, tell them that you’d want to be interviewed at the police station UNLESS:

a) they say it is a serious matter, but expect it to be shown to be a false accusation very early on and very easily. If in doubt : police station, legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its up to you but ONLY ever say anything when accompanied by a solicitor. No matter if its serious or minor.

 

If its serious, then you speak to them at the station accompanied by a solicitor. Don't take the risk.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Record them! Tell them you are doing so but as it is your home, you don't have to tell them anything. If the police 'want' or 'need' to visit rather than 'ask' if they may visit you, I would be wary. Some police ( but certainly not all) use this tactic to avoid the need to get a search warrant. If you are suspected of committing a crime, demand they arrest you and take you to a police station.

If you have witnessed a crime, make sure the questioning is not of the sort that could incriminate you. They may not be there to be convenient to you but as a tool to look around to see if there is something visible that could have been 'obtained' or 'used' in a criminal act.

 

I'm not against the police in any way but I have met a few that have their own agenda. To catch you out. If in doubt, would ring back and state that you would prefer a meeting at the police station.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

that will breach s44 of the Terrorisn Act.

Phone them back and ask them what it is about and yes, go to police station instead because thye all have CCTV and recording in all rooms

 

S44 of the Terrorism Act is repealed, but I’m not sure that is the section you mean ....

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11/section/44

Link to post
Share on other sites

As i already said, if its serious like they say, go to the station and do it formally. Not have them come to your house and ask you dodgy questions without representation.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s about someone who was murderd some years ago and they’ve only just been able to identify him.

 

Apparently, he was last seen in the town with me and another guy, they said it’s nothing to worry about and just want to talk to me. This guys body ended up miles away in another town a few months after he went missing.

 

I haven’t been informed that it is an interview or anything like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are travelling down from up north tomorrow afternoon, so need to know whether to cancel and request it’s done at my local police station with a solicitor or do I talk to them tomorrow with a friend present at my house? Hope someone can help quickly.

 

But as stated it’s abkut someone I knew who went missing years ago and I may have been the last person to see him in my town before he went missing, I might not have been but apparently no one else saw him after me and my friend.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to worry about then.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am seriously considering cancelling and seeking advice first.

 

Purely because all they have said is that they want to chat.

 

They haven’t said whether they are talking to me as a possible witness or suspect and they haven’t informed me of any rights whatsoever.

 

i have never been asked before to have the police round my house for a voluntary “chat”?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have done nowt wrong you have nothing to worry about..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t but that’s not the point.

 

I’d feel safer that whatever is said is properly recorded.

 

Also, I’ve never been asked to do something like this at home before.

 

They also haven’t made it clear if this is just a so called chat or an interview at home, this is unknown territory for me so I’m going to postpone tomorrow and seek advice first which I think is sensible.

 

I don’t know if they are classing me as a witness or suspect or possible one of either or what? They haven’t made anything clear, or what the procedure is or what my rights are?

 

That makes me cautious because even though I’m not involved and don’t have anything to worry about, things need to be done properly and also as a vulnerable person I need to protect myself and also use my rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always say you don't want to be interviewed and have nothing to say. There's absolutely nothing compelling you to talk to them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve cancelled today, stating I would like to seek advice, I didn’t say advice, just legal advice.

 

I feel bad accepting and then declining as it may make me look bad, but I did also state to them that I have no information for them which is true because I barely knew the guy and I don’t know anything about his disappearance.

 

I will seek some advice today, and it will either be that I’ll say that I don’t want to be interviewed by them or if a solicitor advises to talk to them under formal circumstances with a recording then I may do that. I’ll see what a solicitor says first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have done the right thing.

Go to a police station when they eventually contact you and say the truth.

Make sure not to drift out of what you clearly remember, there's no harm in saying that you don't remember something.

After years memory can be confused between reality and what is called false memories, something processed by the brain to feel like a real fact when it's not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have done the right thing.

Go to a police station when they eventually contact you and say the truth.

Make sure not to drift out of what you clearly remember, there's no harm in saying that you don't remember something.

After years memory can be confused between reality and what is called false memories, something processed by the brain to feel like a real fact when it's not.

 

I barely knew him, met him a handful of times and when I last saw him I can’t even remember what we were doing or where we were, all I know is that he either walked home alone or with the other guy, he went missing 17 years ago, his body was found 16 years ago but it’s only just been identified, I have no info for the police at all.

 

When they contacted me informing me it was about so and so, I didn’t even know who they were referring to and thought they had contacted the wrong person, I didn’t even know his surname, only his first name, that’s what I mean I barely knew him and have no information for the police, I can’t help them as I don’t know anything helpful to assist them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good just tell them that then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely I canÂ’t tell them that on the phone without them having to travel for hours to come to my house to do it?

 

Finally found a legal aid solicitor who is phoning them to clarify the situation and also that if they need to talk to me if it would have to be at the station and they will represent me also.

 

They said I did the right thing not having them here.

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...