Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
    • Less than 1% of Japan's top companies are led by women despite years of efforts to address the issue.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Suppressed Cancer Cure-Court Case .19th November-London.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1981 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Two posts ago from the BBC the reporter who wrote yesterday.

However, Noakes told the court he no longer claims GcMAF can cure cancer.

 

But Ian R Crane says

 

The BBC report is not reporting FACTS ....The reporter, who is sitting in front on me in Court, is deliberately reporting David's evidence completely out of context!

 

Ian Rowland Crane When asked if he would now claim that GcMAF cures Cancer, he stated that he wouldn't ... because he was now aware that such a statement attracts the unbridled wrath of the Establishment and the Pharmaceutical industry!

 

Interesting,all will become clear.

Today's early update from outside Southwark Crown Court.the day begins.

 

Day 4 : Thurs 22nd Nov 2018

HUMANITY (David Noakes) vs

The CORPORATOCRACY (MHRA) & the Suppression of EFFECTIVE Cancer Treatment

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it’s all a big plot by Big Pharma.

 

What about the countless Haematologists and Oncologists employed by the NHS, who aren’t paid by “Big Pharma”.

If these snake oil cures are so wonderful, why aren’t the clinicians using them?

Options are:

a) they are in Big Pharma’s pocket : what, all of them

b) they are fooled by Big Pharma: don’t you think they’d try them if there was a shred of evidence they work?. Who wouldn’t want to go down in history as the person who established a new, better, treatment?.

(Barry Marshall got a Nobel Prize ....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Marshall )

c) the “cure” is snake oil, and it’s pedlars trade in people’s misery and desperation.

 

On balance of probabilities I’m going with c)

 

TawnyOwl : why do you keep pushing the agenda and comments of that quack?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it’s all a big plot by Big Pharma.

 

What about the countless Haematologists and Oncologists employed by the NHS, who aren’t paid by “Big Pharma”.

 

and what about the millionaires who still die of cancer ... who could generate this in a 'safe' way.

 

 

Undoubtedly lifestyle impacts the bodies immune system, as does NOX and many other chemicals, as does gut biome, but ...

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bazas.

Just following a case to its conclusion,no agenda just found it interesting.

Trying to learn a little about this GcMAF which if i am reading right is within us but when the immune system is down and given back

can kickstart the bodies fightback.I hope that is correct if not ,i will correct things as time goes by.

Many are finding the case interesting as i do.

 

I have other things to do apart from posting threads as you do.

Some of the posts already made by people who have illnesses or conditions have helped me learn a little.

It could be that i am a nosey devil.

I have no medical knowledge at all ,about Snake Oil or heard the name before you put it in your first post.

I had to look it up to see what it meant.

 

Just following the case to the end to see what happens to David Noakes and hopefully by then there will be other coverage apart from the two sources i have found so far covering the case.

That is all,have your say,no problem hopefully others will to,if not,well it is just another thread that will be forgotten in the mists of time.

Who knows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better put this on.

GcMAF as a Cancer Treatment

What is GcMAF?

GcMAF is a vitamin D-binding protein. It’s scientifically known as Gc protein-derived macrophage activating factor. It’s a protein that supports the immune system, and naturally found in the body. GcMAF activates macrophage cells, or the cells responsible for fighting off infection and disease.

https://www.healthline.com/health/gcmaf-cancer-treament

 

GcMAF as an experimental cancer treatment

Because of GcMAF’s role in the immune system, one theory is that an externally developed form of this protein may have the potential to treat cancer. The theory is, by injecting external GcMAF protein into the body, the immune system can function better and fight off cancer cells.

This treatment method isn’t approved for medical use, and is highly experimental. A recent phase I clinical trial is examining a cancer immunotherapy developed from natural Gc protein. However, no study results have been posted. This is the first time this treatment is being examined using established research guidelines.

Previous research available from certain institutions on this treatment method has been questioned. In one case, the studies on GcMAF and cancer were retracted. In another case, the research group publishing the information also sells the protein supplements. Therefore, there’s a conflict of interest.

https://www.healthline.com/health/gcmaf-cancer-treament#can-it-treat-cancer?
Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it’s all a big plot by Big Pharma.

 

Yes!

I think this is snake oil too, however, I have tried on my own skin that doctors and NHS in general are holding cures so we can be on medications for life.

See my earlier post and here I found a link:

 

https://www.regmednet.com/users/1297-elena-conroy/posts/2615-new-phase-iii-stem-cell-study-for-treatment-of-back-pain-associated-with-degenerative-disc-disease

 

Many rich people are miraculously cured of cancer.

A few years ago Mr Berlusconi was diagnosed with prostate cancer, he went on "holiday" to Cuba (remember the photos with Fidel Castro while wearing a bandana?).

He came back and cancer had disappeared.

No chemotherapy, no other mainstream treatment.

Rumours have it that there are clinics for the elite in Cuba offering stem cell treatment.

Not only a matter of money, but also power and political friendship.

In Italy stem cell treatment is forbidden by law and if you want to start a trial you have to fund it yourself.

All patient of the trial must appear before a judge to participate and only desperate cases are allowed, the ones who are already dead but technically alive.

Who's benefiting from this?

Surely not national health services or the patients.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not medically trained at all other than basic lifesaving (swimming and industry)

 

but it seems to me that although the standard flu jab and vaccine approach most certainly does work (very basically - put dead nasty cells in the body for the immune system to practice on) this approach does not work against 'cancers' which are not identified as foreign.

 

I do remember reading all sorts of things about aggravated immune systems and destroyed gut bacteria (diet and antibiotics) causing all sorts of issues - and also a particular microbe in the gut that causes ulcers and cancers which a particular antibiotic addresses.

 

More than happy to have someone who knows about this expand/correct.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

GcMAF which if i am reading right is within us but when the immune system is down and given back can kickstart the bodies fightback.I hope that is correct if not ,i will correct things as time goes by.

.

 

Given all I’ve posted, do you really believe that that is correct about GCMAF?

 

If so, are you interested in buying some bridges I could sell you? Great tourist attractions with both income and capital appreciation potential .......

Link to post
Share on other sites

GcMAF: Unlicensed HIV drug 'nearly killed patient' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-guernsey-46308221

 

“Up to 75% of patients who reported taking an unlicensed drug marketed as a cure for autism, HIV and cancer, suffered side effects, a court heard.”

 

“During the hearing Noakes defended GcMAF as a treatment for a number of conditions, but on Tuesday said he no longer claims it cures cancer.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i was waiting for the news to appear and only five minutes ago spotted the link Bazza has put on due to finishing some work later than usual.

And the people who have posted so far i acknowledge the experience they have in threads over the years.

So what is Snake oil as i am sure some do not know,well i didn't anyway.

 

Snake Oil.

A substance with no real medicinal value sold as a remedy for all diseases.

 

From Bassas link.

One of 17 customers wrote she "almost died numerous times" in feedback read at Southwark Crown Court.

 

On Wednesday, the court heard from a member of a self-help group for people with chronic fatigue syndrome based in Chester.

 

Joan Crawford, a chartered chemical engineer, told the court about half of the 16 members who took GcMAF in 2012 experienced positive changes, while a quarter experienced no change, and just "a couple" felt worse in the short-term.

 

So what has Ian R Crane got to say about today's proceedings.

The case continues tomorrow and possibly into next week.I will follow it.

I was going to look into David Noakes past before he started this venture before 2009 but will refrain.

The accounts,lifestyle and other things.

 

I need to go into a darkened room for a while,i feel quite faint
.:-(

 

Anyway last thing Ian R Cranes view of things.Video about two hours or so ago.

Ian R Crane was live.

2 hrs ·

4pm UPDATE : Thurs 22nd Nov 2018

HUMANITY (David Noakes + GcMAF) vs

The CORPORATOCRACY (MHRA)

 

Lets follow it through to the conclusion,whatever that may be.

Bye for now,thanks for posting and showing interest.

As i say i am feeling a little weak at the moment.

Well so far there only seems to be two covering the case.One is the BBC the other Ian R Crane.

Tawnyowl.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well one thing i realise now is how desperate people are for cures.And will try anything.

 

The links are there if you want to see what Ian R Crane is saying today.

I am completely out of my depth with this.

And after reading this article this morning through realise this is turning into one hell of a mess.

Connections to David Noakes and much more.

In fact i feel i can no longer post any more about this case.

So as they say i am out of here.But feel free to post if you like.I think i will stick to Walking the Shoreline instead of sticking my nose into things i do not understand.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/07/16/the-mysterious-death-of-a-doctor-who-peddled-autism-cures-to-thousands/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.277d31f85a5f

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...