Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what the latest data on school suspensions tells us about the UK education system and early intervention.View the full article
    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Suppressed Cancer Cure-Court Case .19th November-London.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1980 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Two posts ago from the BBC the reporter who wrote yesterday.

However, Noakes told the court he no longer claims GcMAF can cure cancer.

 

But Ian R Crane says

 

The BBC report is not reporting FACTS ....The reporter, who is sitting in front on me in Court, is deliberately reporting David's evidence completely out of context!

 

Ian Rowland Crane When asked if he would now claim that GcMAF cures Cancer, he stated that he wouldn't ... because he was now aware that such a statement attracts the unbridled wrath of the Establishment and the Pharmaceutical industry!

 

Interesting,all will become clear.

Today's early update from outside Southwark Crown Court.the day begins.

 

Day 4 : Thurs 22nd Nov 2018

HUMANITY (David Noakes) vs

The CORPORATOCRACY (MHRA) & the Suppression of EFFECTIVE Cancer Treatment

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it’s all a big plot by Big Pharma.

 

What about the countless Haematologists and Oncologists employed by the NHS, who aren’t paid by “Big Pharma”.

If these snake oil cures are so wonderful, why aren’t the clinicians using them?

Options are:

a) they are in Big Pharma’s pocket : what, all of them

b) they are fooled by Big Pharma: don’t you think they’d try them if there was a shred of evidence they work?. Who wouldn’t want to go down in history as the person who established a new, better, treatment?.

(Barry Marshall got a Nobel Prize ....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Marshall )

c) the “cure” is snake oil, and it’s pedlars trade in people’s misery and desperation.

 

On balance of probabilities I’m going with c)

 

TawnyOwl : why do you keep pushing the agenda and comments of that quack?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it’s all a big plot by Big Pharma.

 

What about the countless Haematologists and Oncologists employed by the NHS, who aren’t paid by “Big Pharma”.

 

and what about the millionaires who still die of cancer ... who could generate this in a 'safe' way.

 

 

Undoubtedly lifestyle impacts the bodies immune system, as does NOX and many other chemicals, as does gut biome, but ...

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bazas.

Just following a case to its conclusion,no agenda just found it interesting.

Trying to learn a little about this GcMAF which if i am reading right is within us but when the immune system is down and given back

can kickstart the bodies fightback.I hope that is correct if not ,i will correct things as time goes by.

Many are finding the case interesting as i do.

 

I have other things to do apart from posting threads as you do.

Some of the posts already made by people who have illnesses or conditions have helped me learn a little.

It could be that i am a nosey devil.

I have no medical knowledge at all ,about Snake Oil or heard the name before you put it in your first post.

I had to look it up to see what it meant.

 

Just following the case to the end to see what happens to David Noakes and hopefully by then there will be other coverage apart from the two sources i have found so far covering the case.

That is all,have your say,no problem hopefully others will to,if not,well it is just another thread that will be forgotten in the mists of time.

Who knows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better put this on.

GcMAF as a Cancer Treatment

What is GcMAF?

GcMAF is a vitamin D-binding protein. It’s scientifically known as Gc protein-derived macrophage activating factor. It’s a protein that supports the immune system, and naturally found in the body. GcMAF activates macrophage cells, or the cells responsible for fighting off infection and disease.

https://www.healthline.com/health/gcmaf-cancer-treament

 

GcMAF as an experimental cancer treatment

Because of GcMAF’s role in the immune system, one theory is that an externally developed form of this protein may have the potential to treat cancer. The theory is, by injecting external GcMAF protein into the body, the immune system can function better and fight off cancer cells.

This treatment method isn’t approved for medical use, and is highly experimental. A recent phase I clinical trial is examining a cancer immunotherapy developed from natural Gc protein. However, no study results have been posted. This is the first time this treatment is being examined using established research guidelines.

Previous research available from certain institutions on this treatment method has been questioned. In one case, the studies on GcMAF and cancer were retracted. In another case, the research group publishing the information also sells the protein supplements. Therefore, there’s a conflict of interest.

https://www.healthline.com/health/gcmaf-cancer-treament#can-it-treat-cancer?
Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it’s all a big plot by Big Pharma.

 

Yes!

I think this is snake oil too, however, I have tried on my own skin that doctors and NHS in general are holding cures so we can be on medications for life.

See my earlier post and here I found a link:

 

https://www.regmednet.com/users/1297-elena-conroy/posts/2615-new-phase-iii-stem-cell-study-for-treatment-of-back-pain-associated-with-degenerative-disc-disease

 

Many rich people are miraculously cured of cancer.

A few years ago Mr Berlusconi was diagnosed with prostate cancer, he went on "holiday" to Cuba (remember the photos with Fidel Castro while wearing a bandana?).

He came back and cancer had disappeared.

No chemotherapy, no other mainstream treatment.

Rumours have it that there are clinics for the elite in Cuba offering stem cell treatment.

Not only a matter of money, but also power and political friendship.

In Italy stem cell treatment is forbidden by law and if you want to start a trial you have to fund it yourself.

All patient of the trial must appear before a judge to participate and only desperate cases are allowed, the ones who are already dead but technically alive.

Who's benefiting from this?

Surely not national health services or the patients.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not medically trained at all other than basic lifesaving (swimming and industry)

 

but it seems to me that although the standard flu jab and vaccine approach most certainly does work (very basically - put dead nasty cells in the body for the immune system to practice on) this approach does not work against 'cancers' which are not identified as foreign.

 

I do remember reading all sorts of things about aggravated immune systems and destroyed gut bacteria (diet and antibiotics) causing all sorts of issues - and also a particular microbe in the gut that causes ulcers and cancers which a particular antibiotic addresses.

 

More than happy to have someone who knows about this expand/correct.

The Tory Legacy

Record high Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

10 years to save the Vest

After Truss lost the shirt off the UKs back in 49 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

GcMAF which if i am reading right is within us but when the immune system is down and given back can kickstart the bodies fightback.I hope that is correct if not ,i will correct things as time goes by.

.

 

Given all I’ve posted, do you really believe that that is correct about GCMAF?

 

If so, are you interested in buying some bridges I could sell you? Great tourist attractions with both income and capital appreciation potential .......

Link to post
Share on other sites

GcMAF: Unlicensed HIV drug 'nearly killed patient' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-guernsey-46308221

 

“Up to 75% of patients who reported taking an unlicensed drug marketed as a cure for autism, HIV and cancer, suffered side effects, a court heard.”

 

“During the hearing Noakes defended GcMAF as a treatment for a number of conditions, but on Tuesday said he no longer claims it cures cancer.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i was waiting for the news to appear and only five minutes ago spotted the link Bazza has put on due to finishing some work later than usual.

And the people who have posted so far i acknowledge the experience they have in threads over the years.

So what is Snake oil as i am sure some do not know,well i didn't anyway.

 

Snake Oil.

A substance with no real medicinal value sold as a remedy for all diseases.

 

From Bassas link.

One of 17 customers wrote she "almost died numerous times" in feedback read at Southwark Crown Court.

 

On Wednesday, the court heard from a member of a self-help group for people with chronic fatigue syndrome based in Chester.

 

Joan Crawford, a chartered chemical engineer, told the court about half of the 16 members who took GcMAF in 2012 experienced positive changes, while a quarter experienced no change, and just "a couple" felt worse in the short-term.

 

So what has Ian R Crane got to say about today's proceedings.

The case continues tomorrow and possibly into next week.I will follow it.

I was going to look into David Noakes past before he started this venture before 2009 but will refrain.

The accounts,lifestyle and other things.

 

I need to go into a darkened room for a while,i feel quite faint
.:-(

 

Anyway last thing Ian R Cranes view of things.Video about two hours or so ago.

Ian R Crane was live.

2 hrs ·

4pm UPDATE : Thurs 22nd Nov 2018

HUMANITY (David Noakes + GcMAF) vs

The CORPORATOCRACY (MHRA)

 

Lets follow it through to the conclusion,whatever that may be.

Bye for now,thanks for posting and showing interest.

As i say i am feeling a little weak at the moment.

Well so far there only seems to be two covering the case.One is the BBC the other Ian R Crane.

Tawnyowl.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well one thing i realise now is how desperate people are for cures.And will try anything.

 

The links are there if you want to see what Ian R Crane is saying today.

I am completely out of my depth with this.

And after reading this article this morning through realise this is turning into one hell of a mess.

Connections to David Noakes and much more.

In fact i feel i can no longer post any more about this case.

So as they say i am out of here.But feel free to post if you like.I think i will stick to Walking the Shoreline instead of sticking my nose into things i do not understand.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/07/16/the-mysterious-death-of-a-doctor-who-peddled-autism-cures-to-thousands/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.277d31f85a5f

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...