Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMO - Council Letter - what to do


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1986 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I am not sure if consumer action forum can help me with this but I previously made such a good experience in here that this was my first go to.

 

my brother and I rent a 5 bed room flat (only the 2 of us on the contract) but also rent out the 3 other rooms.

Landlord knows about this and we do not make any money off it.

In total there are in legal terms 3 households (will be 2 in Decembe).

 

We now received a letter from the council starting that this is a Multiple Housing Occupancy.

Somebody reported us.

 

We've live in the flat for 10 years.

I went on the internet because this was news to me and found out that on October 1st a new law was introduced and hence, we are a HMO.

Council would like to come and inspect the property.

 

I read that fines are 30k etc.

I want to call the council tomorrow and explain but I am so scared.

 

I will tell them that I will pay the licence fee which is around 1.5K because I simply did not know about this.

But I know that this is a terrible excuse even though it's True.

I would have never risk a situation like that.

I could blame it on the landlord but on the contract it is only me and my brother.

 

Also I am not the kind of person who would do this to him...he knows about 5 people living here though but the flat complies with all regulations on fire safety etc.

 

I just don't know what to do.

I also know who reported it: my flatmate.

he read that he can get 12 months rent back.

Although I don't get this as well as it was complaint up to October 1st so why should he receive money for a whole year.

 

I am just so worried that they won't give me a chance.

I am not able to repay 12 months rent nor to pay a fine of 30k...

 

.so far the letter states just a visit but I guess best is to call then and say yes you are right

- what can we do about this to avoid issues as we were simply not aware of this new law.

 

Yes if course it could have been avoided but I simply had no idea about it.

Now I know and it won't ever happen again but you know after living in the flat for 10years I never thought of this.

 

My landlord usually made sure that everything is compliant such as gas and electricity checks.

HMO I guess does not fall under it as he officially rents it out to 1 household.

I wish he would have told me about it though (it is an agency )...I would have offered to pay.

 

Calling the council tomorrow but any advice or experience on this ?

Worst news ever really.

I am shaking.

 

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've moved your thread to the residential letting forum from the bailiff discussion forum

as you'll get more knowledgeable people here on your issue.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, discussed with my Brother and the best solution is to ask our flatmates to move out in this scenario.

And keep the flat to ourselves (and our cousin which would be 1 household hence no licence).

Would this be a satisfactory solution for the council?

 

4 weeks and it would be all solved and we would never take anybody else in, they can even come to make checks and all.

Also I want to mention that everyone has really big rooms, with great furniture etc.

And there is 1 person (and in another room a couple) per room only.

So no crazy 5 people per room or anything dodgy like that going on.

Clean and functioning flat.

 

I just hope this works out somehow ok.

I read Mir.eom the internet and people who got fined were landlord who had 30 people living in flats or did not act upon a warning.

Never had a warning , never had more people living in the flat than rooms( max 1 person more if a couple).

But still very worried.

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

I think calling council is the best step

- instead of calling landlord?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What type of Tenancy Agreement do you have from the Landlord for this Property?

 

What do the Tenancy Agreement say about Subletting?

 

Do you have it in writing from the Landlord that they agreed to you renting out the other rooms.

 

What written Agreement did you provide for the rooms you rented out?

 

Have those in the rooms you rented out informed the council they are living at the property?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Short let tenancy agreement.

Has a clause that sunletting is not permitted without consent.

We don't have it written though just verbally.

 

We have emails where we mention other people as well i believe.

Also we had many repairs and the landlord /agency was at the property 2 years ago to view it when they increased rent, so they obviously saw all people as well.

 

Recently he even bought 2 new beds for the 2 of the rooms also, so in theory i can proof that he knew about this and allowed it.

I live in the flat for 10 years.

It could have been avoided if he informed me that this new rule is coming into place and I would have told people to move out or asked him about licence.

 

There is no written agreement on the rooms, so the flatmates have no contract.

They however pay rent into my account and I then transfer to the agency.

Only 1 guy is on the electoral roll register.

I am not sure, I suspect 1 person informed that there are 5 people living here.

Again, they have no tenancy agreements with me.

 

Also i just read that purpose build flats are exempt from this new law.

We live in a purpose build flat (not a house that was concerted into flats).

I hope this really applies...

 

called council

- they were not very helpful.

Just said they need to come to check the structure of the flat...

Also read that this would probably fall under the additional licence for this borough..

 

.I wished I'd just known about this and then I would have made sure flat is 1 household only from October 1st

- or talked to the landlord about the licence.

 

I have sent him all the info, he should know what to do I hope.

I am so annoyed with myself but then again apparently many people were not aware of this change in law...

.and i am not actively looking for law changes to HMO

- will never live in a shared flat for sure now, lesson learned but I am literally losing sleep over things like that.

 

Trying to find something on the invenory that says:

you get a 2nd chance to sort it out, but nothing.

 

All I am reading is how people end up paying 20k for this, but they were official LL and had 20 people living in 7 rooms though, so there is hope...but still.

 

I literally do not know what to do,

I thought council would explain it to me a bit more or give some options or next steps but now they just will come next week to view the flat.

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...