Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1989 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After some advice please

 

I made a payment plan with Jacobs bailiffs for council tax debt back in aug, I missed 1 payment in sept but doubled up the following week.

 

To cut a long story short after I was late paying I received a letter saying the payment plan was no longer in place.

 

I've had several bailiff visits and I've not opened the door but I have continued to make my weekly payments with fail every week.

 

I have continued to receive letters and texts saying removal action is imminent and today another text saying the removal team will attend today between 6am and 9pm.

 

I don't understand why they continue to hassle me when I am still making my weekly payments.

 

Any advice please would be great.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant remove anything unless theyve gained entry and performed a levy on goods.

 

The reason they are chasing is because you missed a payment but didnt inform them. Doesnt matter if you make it up, you still have to tell them, as they will just think youve stopped paying.

 

Have they performed a levy on anything you own? Such as a vehicle?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did inform them I would double up the next week and they should be aware I am still paying as every letter I receive the price has gone down. No levy has been made on anything as they have not entered my property and we don't have a car

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont let them in, keep paying, and i would also inform the council as well. Youll get futher advice, but the bailiffs should not be saying theyre coming to remove when they know they cant.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I wondered if it was just an empty threat in order to get me to phone them? I've spoken with the council before and they just say I have to deal with Jacobs. I'm guessing the chances of them turning up today are slim then if they know they can't do anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

It was in response to the first letter they sent so made over the phone

 

 

 

 

 

 

So they had only added £75 to what you owed then. By missing a payment - for whatever reason - they then class this as a broken arrangement whether you pay or not - this in turn triggers a visit fee of £235 which will now be added to what you owe. Fighting it with the enforcement co will be like hitting your head off a brick wall & would hazard a guess the Councils attitude will be "tough". Try getting your local Councillor involved and in particular remind him/her that the Council are very much responsible for the actions of their contractors. http://www.writetothem.com

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes both those costs have already been added which those alone more than doubled what we originally owed to the council. I have continued to make my payments that I'd agreed to initially and they can see that so why the constant threats of attending again? I've I'd have stopped paying completely it's understandable but I haven't and have never missed a payment since

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much was the Liability Order the Council obtained? What they are hoping for is that they can gain access or Take Control of Goods outside - car perhaps, so that next time they can remove it and then add extra charges.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Original amount owed to the council was £222.0. we now owe £190.01 so clearly they can see we've nearby paid it off.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for that. Do you know how much you have paid to date? When the arrangement was originally set up did they confirm it in writing? How much do you pay per week?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To date we have paid them £342.00 which is more than the original debt to the council. The council tell me they haven't received all of the money yet as Jacobs take out their fees first before sending any money over to council. We pay £30 a week. Yes I believe they did but can't lay may my hands on it just yet to confirm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for providing that. Taking their fees out first - £310 - shows you have only paid some £32 towards the debt, each payment you make will probably take 2 weeks to be forwarded to the Council which is why it always show as lagging.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And that's crazy and we've already paid more than the original debt. Just frustrating that we still pay every week and they're still harassing us even when they know they can't come and remove any goods as they haven't taken control of any

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just make sure nothing of value outside especially a car or motorbike

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

After some advice please

 

I made a payment plan with Jacobs bailiffs for council tax debt back in aug, I missed 1 payment in sept but doubled up the following week.

 

To cut a long story short after I was late paying I received a letter saying the payment plan was no longer in place.

 

I've had several bailiff visits and I've not opened the door but I have continued to make my weekly payments with fail every week.

 

I have continued to receive letters and texts saying removal action is imminent and today another text saying the removal team will attend today between 6am and 9pm.

 

I don't understand why they continue to hassle me when I am still making my weekly payments. .

 

I have never liked weekly payment arrangements for exactly the reason that you have highlighted.

 

In the first instance, we need to take on board that it was not until 2014 that bailiffs were encouraged by the government to accept payment arrangements. If a payment arrangement is agreed, then it is the responsibility of the debtor to ENSURE that their agreed payment is made by the agreed date. If it is the case that for one reason for another ,payment cannot be made on the agreed date, then the debtor should contact the enforcement company in ADVANCE. If you had done that and had paid the missing payment the following week (together with your usual weekly payment) then I would have expected the payment arrangement to continue to be in place.

 

You need to also take on board that when the regulations were overhauled in 2014, all enforcement companies had to make huge adjustments to their computer systems to manage 'payment arrangements' and deal with 'pro rata' distribution of payments. This would have included computer programmes recognising payment arrangements that had defaulted (such as yours). In this respect, the computer system would cancel the arrangement and the relevant account would automatically progress to the 'enforcement stage' (which is exactly what has happened in your case).

 

When a case progresses to the 'enforcement stage' the the position changes in that the PURPOSE of the visit will be to 'take control of goods' (usually a motor vehicle). There is also the added problem in that an 'enforcement fee' of £235 is applied.

 

As you do not have a vehicle and are not minded to let the bailiff into your home, there is actually very little that the enforcement company can do. The bailiff would still be able to make a personal visit to your home and 'reminder' letters can continue to be sent. Please be assured though that no further fees can now be added.

 

The Removal Notice is computer generated and I would not worry unduly any further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks I have just spoken with the council and they've given me a list of all the payments they have received so far which totals £161.57. originally order was for 267.01.

 

Hi

 

You have my sympathies, you seem to be being hindered in paying your debt rather than helped.

 

If you have the amount paid between the first notice from the bailiff and his first visit we can work out exactly what you should owe.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...