Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court summons for council tax received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1959 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I care for my mother who has dementia.

She has a few things, mostly relating to her health and divorce that I've been trying to sort out.

I had advised the local council that I was struggling to cope and that my step dad, her ex husband had suddenly cut off all her bills and not paid them.

My social worker said that it was finance related and that she couldn't help.

 

The council tax bill was addressed for number 46- not sure why they had suddenly got our address wrong.

when I first heard that the council tax bill hadn't been paid, it'd been a couple of months already, as the letter had gone to my neighbour.

 

I explained this to them on the phone and they sent me some forms to fill in on behalf of my mum, but several other things have happened, including waiting for evidence to come through etc.

 

The person I spoke to was sure my mum was entitled not to pay because of her condition, but I'm not even sure what category she fell into.

 

I suffer with depression and it's a lot of pressure to deal with when caring for someone.

She's recently had a massive decline in her condition but it seems like no one cares or wants to help.

 

I've now received a magistrates court summons for an amount of £1300 to be paid upfront

From the letter, they're not interested in the ins and outs and just want payment.

 

Please can you advise. I will of course speak to them, but they're not open until Monday.

 

Thank you.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Magistrates summons would actually be issued by council as an admin process, which go before Magistrates if you don't respond to the summons.

 

Speak to the council on Monday and advise them of the issues. If they are not interested, advise that you will turn up at the Magistrates on the date advised on the Summons and speak to Magistrates regarding the issues with the council tax bill having the wrong address and the council not being interesting in resolving the issues.

 

If you Mum has severe health issues she may be entitled to claim for a reduction in the council tax. Have a look at the councils website.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

 

So, what you're saying is the summons is actually from the council and not from the court and I can still discuss this with them before they send it to court? Because, they've given me a court date actually.

 

The council have since corrected the address, but I'm not sure how it got changed in the first place, so I'm not sure they will take me seriously. I will try though!

 

She has dementia and the website wasn't clear, so they've sent me the forms, which are also unclear, because she doesn't seem to fall into any of the categories. I was supposed to check with them, but other things happened and it's taken me longer to get round to things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the Council issue the Summons and the date set at Magistrates is a one the Council have booked. They arrange a room at the Magistrates where they attempt to gain payment arrangements and if not agreed, the debtor is dealt with by Magistrates.

 

If you manage to get the Council to deal with this before the Magistrates date, they can cancel the summons and make arrangements with you.

 

You really need to speak to someone at the Council that deals with vulnerable people and can assist with this. The Council will have teams that help in this situation. The Council tax collections team might have been outsourced to a private company, just interested in collecting money. Your local councillors can put you in touch with relevant people at the Council.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you- I wasn't sure.

 

I will definitely speak to them and I tried calling yesterday but they're only open Mon- Fri.

 

Hopefully it will get sorted, but I know for a fact we can't pay the full amount upfront. The back of the letter is filled with scenarios and they've basically said they don't care they want everything now, which is quite scary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should contact her local Councillor(s) today - even though it is Sunday - best done by phone and ask they take this up for you. If they refuse or are reluctant then go straight to the Leader of the Council and their opposite number. Councillor details can be had from http://www.writetothem.com

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should just like to add – the advice you are getting here is excellent all through and you should follow it. However, you are being advised all the time to use the telephone. Firstly you should make sure that you have read our customer services guide and implemented the advice there. This is essential. Secondly, you should be putting everything in writing. Take sure you follow up every telephone conversation with a letter which confirms what was said on the telephone. You absolutely do need a paper trail here so that nobody later on can deny that they want told. Also, if you end up having to go to court then I'm afraid that simply telling the court that you told people over the phone when be very impressive. Far better to turn up with the copies of several letters that you sent and show them to the court so that it is clear that you did write and you did explain the situation.

 

Finally, even though you may be told by the council that everything will be sorted and you don't need to worry, I should go to court anyway on the date. I'm afraid that there are lots of people on this forum who think that they have made some kind of arrangement but the word doesn't filter through and eventually some anonymous council clerk turns up in court with an armful of files and they are just rubberstamp through.

 

If you do go to court then you should go there early – at least half an hour before the hearing time. Don't just wait outside the court but speak to the Usher and find out which court your case is going to be heard in.

 

Then go into the court and find the clerk of the court and pass a note to the clerk saying that you are present to answer to your case – give the case number and full name and address.

 

Explain to the clerk that you will want to talk and to object to the application.

 

You have to be very careful not to be ignored. The court dealing with loads of files. Hardly anybody ever turns up and they just like to process them and get them out of the way. You really have to make sure that you get there early and also make sure that people know that you are there and make sure that your case will be taken out of the pile and treated individually and that you will be given a chance to talk.

 

Hopefully they really will be sorted out – but I'm giving you "worst case" advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suffer with depression and it's a lot of pressure to deal with when caring for someone.

She's recently had a massive decline in her condition but it seems like no one cares or wants to help.

If you're resident at the property then the best discount could be 50% - if you're not resident then the best case would be a council tax exemption. It all depends on whether she is SMI for council tax purposes (and, if you are resident, if you qualify as a carer or not). https://lgfa92.co.uk/council-tax-severely-mentally-impaired-smi/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to everyone who took the time to give me advice and I'm sorry I haven't been on to give you feedback.

 

I spoke to the council and they said they will be able to withdraw the summons once the receive the forms back proving that my mum indeed has a medical condition.

 

I explained to them that the forms were outdated and nowhere did it list PIP as a qualifying benefit.

They've asked me to manually amend the form and the guy I spoke to said he will bring it up next in the team meeting, because DLA is being phased out.

 

I sent them back the form on the same day.

The guy I spoke to told me, I had been sent the wrong form for myself.

I'm most likely exempt from council tax but the form they sent me in the first place isn't the right one.

 

I will let you know if and once this has all be resolved. Thank you :)

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

looking good!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to everyone who took the time to give me advice and I'm sorry I haven't been on to give you feedback.

 

I spoke to the council and they said they will be able to withdraw the summons once the receive the forms back proving that my mum indeed has a medical condition.

 

I explained to them that the forms were outdated and nowhere did it list PIP as a qualifying benefit.

They've asked me to manually amend the form and the guy I spoke to said he will bring it up next in the team meeting, because DLA is being phased out.

 

I sent them back the form on the same day.

The guy I spoke to told me, I had been sent the wrong form for myself.

I'm most likely exempt from council tax but the form they sent me in the first place isn't the right one.

 

I will let you know if and once this has all be resolved. Thank you :)

 

DLA will remain as a qualifying benefit (it will do so for historical claim purposes) so I hope they don't remove it ! PiP was added as a qualifying benefit for SMI with effect from 1 April 2013 - so only 5 1/2 years ago... There are a few different councils where I've had to point out similar (mind, the most commonly used council tax handbook also has a error along the same lines for qualifying benefits but with the carers disregard).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello everyone,

 

A small update. So I've sent the form back for my mum to show she has a mental impairment but they've said the court case will go ahead as it is in a queue waiting to get processed. The person on the phone has put our account on hold and has already removed the summons charges for us and he said we don't have to attend court. The summons is to obtain a liability order.

 

What is your take on this? Should I still go?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone,

 

A small update. So I've sent the form back for my mum to show she has a mental impairment but they've said the court case will go ahead as it is in a queue waiting to get processed. The person on the phone has put our account on hold and has already removed the summons charges for us and he said we don't have to attend court. The summons is to obtain a liability order.

 

What is your take on this? Should I still go?

 

If the council have marked the summons as withdrawn on their system then they should, at the liability order hearing, advice the magistrates that they no longer wish to pursue the order and that the application is withdrawn. There's usually no problem but if you feel you need something in writing then ask the council to confirm the application is being withdrawn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...