Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1956 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

In September 2017, I purchased a leasehold tenanted flat above a commercial premises.

 

The entrance to my property is on the first floor and you have to climb some external stairs to reach the front door.

 

After purchase the landlord decided to convert two offices in the same building into flats.

 

The other two flats (which have just been converted from offices and are still owned by the freeholder, but are up for sale) have an entrance door on the ground floor and internal stairs to the individual flats.

 

In order to sell these flats some quite drastic improvements in the form of wooden cladding have been made to the ground floor area surrounding the ground level entrance door to the two aforementioned flats. ( I have to walk through this area for access to my own property)

However, the actual area leading to my own property, has been left in the same state as before and no cladding has been added here.

 

Additionally, there is a small flat roof to part of the ground floor commercial properties within the same area.

 

As there has been a several unsuccessful attempts to repair a leak on this roof which is affecting one of the commercial premises, they have decided to put some plastic corrugated sheets at first floor height, making a makeshift roof one floor higher, to prevent any water getting to the lower flat roof, therefore addressing the leak.

 

This is actually a repair to the commercial premises but has been addressed in the communal area, inappropriately in my opinion as they have attached a frame to my windows in order to attach the roof to. In expressing my concern about this they agreed to remove it. That was July, and it's still there.

 

An absolute eyesore (picture 1 )

Initially, I had received a bill for these works but upon meeting with the agent and expressing my concern he agreed no bill would be issued.

 

I have now received a bill for the service charge for the last 6 months.

 

This bill is 3x the amount suggested when I signed the lease.

 

It was approximated to be £35 per month,( draft agreement photo 2) but the bill I have received equates to around £90 per month.

 

They are obviously trying to get their money that way!

 

Upon first acquiring the property, I received and paid a service charge bill for around £40 per month, which I paid, but this was then returned to me by cheque as they were about to start work on the other 2 flats and said that they would waive the service charge until works were completed.

 

I have now received this further inflated service charge, which is obviously to pay for the improvements made outside of the 2 ground floor flats (an area that has to be passed through to access my own, but my own outside are has not been subject to similar renovations) they want to charge me separately (£997) for conducting similar renovations in my immediate external area. Actual service charge breakdown Photo 3

 

It is also to pay for the corrugated plastic roof shown in the picture 1

 

Picture 4 shows the monstrous view from immediately outside the front door.

 

I have objected strongly to this roof for the reasons outlined initially but it remains attached to my own properties windows and they now want me to pay for the privilige!

 

I'm going to admit to being baffled by the legal jargon and am currently simply refusing to pay.

 

Not sure what to do next caggers, but really feel this is very unjust.

 

 

photo1

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B8TsY4aaYjNP3VH_xH8GoJYlMca47_UY/view?usp=sharingphoto 2

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BpZNQu4TTu7iwKuN2CgSsFYpZ5hHR6Vt/view?usp=sharingPhoto 3

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11VmUF3Zc_GwCskHus3sPS_zwX5x_wwt0/view?usp=sharing photo 4

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bodgers at their best!

Roof leaks, tell you what, let's put a canopy over that!

My advice:

1. Tell them you want that structure off your windows view in 30 days as it surely breaches the lease

2.ask all documents, receipts, invoices, etc. related to service charges. They must give them to you within a month under the landlord and tenants act.

3. When you get these documents, ask for a refund for anything that doesn't apply or is related to this bodged job.

4. Come back here for further advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, following the advice of King12345 I will address these issues seperately..

 

Item1:

I requested that the canopy construction be removed, and have now had a response from Mason Owen, the estate agents representing the leaseholder.

They say that they will remove the canopy. However I have concerns;

 

[1] They say they intend to rebuild the canopy at a higher level, above my windows, I do not want this as the view will again be seriosly affected, replacing my current view of the sky with a view of corrogated plastic, placing me inside some kind of corrogated greenhouse! Temperatures in summertime will be unbearable.

 

They also state clearly that I will be charged for this new construction.

"The canopy benefits the entire building, and as such will be charged as a service charge cost"

 

 

[2] There will be damage to my window frames when they remove the current construction, what can I do?

 

[3]I mentioned that I would be looking to replace the windows at some stage in the future, they said ... "It has been noted though that if you wish to install new windows it will be easier to do at the time of the canopy being replaced, I would therefore be grateful if you could confirm if you intend to replace your windows at the same time as the canopy removal"

 

I fear that after the new construction, if I cannot stop it, it will be difficult to replace my windows at a time when it is finacially best for me to do it, is there any way I can stop this construction happening?

 

To clarify, the windows in the photos are a small part of a set of windows which span 2 sides of my building, offering a view across the local town.

 

thanks you and any advice is greaty appreciated, these people have me worried.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Windows can be replaced from inside your property, unless you call the cowboys who built that canopy...

So it's a completely different job and they must make good any damage left behind when the remove the canopy.

On second point, I would strongly argue that they need to fix the roof, not build another canopy, also because it surely doesn't comply with regulations (planning permission might be needed)

Fixing the roof is cheaper than bridging another canopy which would require constant maintenance.

Then, loss of air, view and thermal comfort all contribute to your points.

Did you try getting the council involved?

Ideally you need a name to refer to in all communication, otherwise you'd pass from post to post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Caggers, after reading the info on the link provided by stu007, and taking on board the advice from king12345. I separated the problems,

Item 1: The Canopy. Item 2: The service charge.

 

[1] The Canopy:

I wrote to them on 23rd Nov, I have made it very clear that I strongly object to the construction of a new canopy, and a warning that any construction should not be attached or secured to my property.

This makes it impossible for them to hang it up there anyway (copy of letter attached)

 

They replied same day stating

" Thank you for your email, I will discuss this with xxx next week and revert in due course"

17/12/18 I am still waiting for a reply.

 

 

***********************************************************************

 

[2] The Service charge:

I have requested supporting documentation / receipts for the charges listed on my service charge invoice, all of their figures seem "very rounded",

They replied with

"In terms of documentation, this is the first year that a service charge has been run, as such the only documents that I currently have available is the SC budget that you are in receipt of. "

 

I have again requested copies of supporting receipts on 11th Dec as this is 30 days after the initial request and they have not replied.

copy mo letter cag.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which financial year are we talking about?

If they started service charges after April 2018, you will need to wait until they close the accounts in April 2019 and send you the statutory summary.

Then, within six months from receiving the summary, you request documentation and they have a month to send it to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...