Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Chasing Recent 02 Account


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1778 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

All the better for you if ever they litigate...no paperwork no trace.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The latter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

Received the SAR Return from 02 this morning. I have gone through it all and it looks like the amount lowlifes are claiming is composed of £118.10 airtime use and £252 Handset charge. I thought I had paid off the handset when I entered the contract however checking my bank records I only paid a deposit on the handset and this was a 02 Refresh deal.

 

I got a email from lowlifes yesterday stating they are still trying to get the information from 02 to answer my complaint.

 

In Light of the SAR return can anyone suggest what I do next? In siting on this until lowlifes come back with a response to my complaint.

 

Lowell have now purchased a old EE account now in short Im giving them both barrels. I sent a sar to EE who only responded with a copy final bill however, happily the final bill makes clear that the debt relates to unpaid charges to the end of contract which I am going to counter this with CRA 2015. Can anyone point me to the the provisions about mobile contracts in CRA 2015? I had a look yesterday but couldn't see the provisions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its actually clarified and stated in the Unfair terms in Contracts for Communications and The Consumer Rights Act 2015

 

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/asse...0/guidance.PDF

 

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/unfair-t...ses-full-guide

 

You may find the following thread of interest...if they move to the next stage and issue you a court claim.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?488827-Lowell-claimform-old-O2mobile-debt/page6

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its actually clarified and stated in the Unfair terms in Contracts for Communications and The Consumer Rights Act 2015

 

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/40620/guidance.PDF

 

oft311 (1).pdf

 

&

 

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/unfair-t...ses-full-guide

 

 

 

You may find the following thread of interest...if they move to the next stage and issue you a court claim.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?488827-Lowell-claimform-old-O2mobile-debt/page6

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you take this out?

do you remember poss signing 2 docs one for the airtime contract and another for the handset agreement?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX,

 

I took this out in December 2017 and yes I signed two documents digitally at a 02 shop. One was the contract for airtime and the other was for the handset agreement. The Sar Return has both contracts attached quite comprehensive compared to the account EE has supplied,

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Hi Andy Thanks for that sadly those links don't work "

 

Thats why I added the PDFs under the links.

 

 

guidance.pdf

 

 

consumer-contracts-information-cancellation-and-additional-payments-regulations-guidance.pdf

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I emailed Lowlifes yesterday about the EE Account explaining that £252.88 of their supposed amount is EOC charges they came back today with this.

 

Good Afternoon..

 

Thank you for your email.

 

Account Number: ... – Original Client: EE Limited – Current Balance: £390.17

 

Your amount owed is broken down as follows:

 

Open date: 11/03/2012

 

Last payment 30/03/2017 for £52.66

 

DD rejected – refer to payer

 

Airtime debt value £137.63 – made up of phone charges and accrued bills.

 

Early termination penalties £252.54

 

Your bill is made up airtime debt and early termination penalties.

This happened because you stopped paying your Direct Debits.

The Handset you take on each contract or upgrade is incorporated into the monthly fee.

 

EE generally offer 24 month contracts.

Your account indicates you were on plan which would have ended 11/03/2018.

Upon entering your contract by use of the sim, you accept the terms and conditions outlined in your agreement.

A full copy of the terms and conditions are outlined on theEE website: ee.co.uk.

 

Based upon this information we believe the balance to be valid and owing and cannot agree to dismiss the charges.

 

I’ve placed your account on hold for 14 days to allow you time to review these details and advise your intentions.

 

Now my thinking on this is that there was no ancillary contract for the Handset so that matter they refer to is immaterial in law.

Also they also seem to think CRA 2015 and Ofcom Guidance don't override their policy.

 

I have been looking at the PDF's that Andyorch kindly provided and Im pretty sure that I now know the points I can counter this with.

I am quite Happy to pay the airtime arrears of £137.63.

 

am I right that £252.54 termination charge is unfair under CRA 2015? and Ofcom Guidance

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

we never said email them.

never use email

it just gives them a free way of harassing you.

from now on block their email address make them write.

 

pers i'd sit on your hands now and see if the issue a PAP letter of claim.

 

as long as they know your CURRENT address

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Well time has gone by now EE are in default of SAR.  

 

Just got a letter from the lowlifes today stating ‘please contact us to arrange payment” 

it’s taken them five months to come up with this

 

I’m going to sit this one out Until such a time as they try court

 

I have a robust defence for both accounts now thanks to the forum members.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good work

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...