Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My debts and mental health


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1988 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Its been a long time since my last post, but i do visit regularly.

my question is, do credit card co have the right to a financial statement ? I know the court has but who else.

i would rather not have to send my financial information to any one.

hope everybody had a good xmas and looking forward to a good new year.

Shedder101

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell us the full story please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No story really.

a friend of mine asked me the question and i wanted to make sure my facts were correct.

I have pointed her to the site, should she need any further help

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good move!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I don’t know if this will be of interest, hopefully for people in the same circumstances it will be.

The history of this is a little personal but I feel it needs to be said.

 

In 2005 I had a breakdown, I had a MBNA credit card with £7000 credit limit when I went on a spending spree and in the interim I applied and got another MBNA card with £6500 limit.

 

During the time of my illness I ran both cards up to the max and I was struggling to make the min payments as I also had several other cards at the time.

got these cards by simply applying for balance transfers they were throwing them at me.

Needless to say I defaulted on the two MBNA cards.

 

I wrote to them explaining my situation that I was now on medication and to offer a smaller amount of monthly repayments.

I made the lesser payments each month and each month they marked it as a late payment default and the balance continued to rise.

 

Eventually I stopped paying, a couple of letters and emails from them stating I was in default.

It then went to MBNA debt office, these people were quite aggressive in their emails demanding payment in full and threatening debt collectors.

 

I then wrote to them asking for the charges they kept adding to the account for late payments, I wasn’t late I just didn’t pay the minimum, I also blamed them for putting me in this position, they kept increasing the credit limit so I kept spending and in my condition I had no idea what I was doing.

 

Now on medication, I wrote a strong letter complaining they were the reason I was in debt and they should give me the discount on the advance charges as well as the extra interest cost, I had no reply.

 

Two months later I received a letter from MBNA saying they had written off my debt of over 13k and closed the account.

On checking my credit report it shows as closed balance 0

 

this came as a shock as I had a Tesco card with a large debt on who wouldn’t talk to me regarding my illness and instantly passed it to Frederickson’s.

 

I hope this might help others who suffer mental illness and not to let the credit card co bully them.

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for writing -it cannot have been easy.

You must be pleased that MBNA have written off your outstanding amount which would have reduced the pressure on you no end.

And it is quite a surprise to me as MBNA are not usually so understanding-so well done them.

 

I don't expect Frederickson's will do the right thing and you are best to ignore them and block their calls though reducing the debt by 50% may not necessarily mean the original contract was unlawful in your case.

 

It may be Tesco's suggesting a large reduction because of your health problems.

It might be worth writing to Tesco again, pointing out your financial situation, what MBNA have done to help alleviate your stress and how Frederickson are really harassing you to make payments that sadly you can no longer make.

Then ask if they would kindly consider what MBNA did which would help enormously in helping your rehabilitation.

 

It might work or at least rein in Frederickson a bit.

 

Good luck with your recovery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

indeed i was so releved when MBNA did that. i have writen to Tesco several times with no responce at all.

on my credit report from Noddle it shows from tesco a default every month since sep 2016 even this month, clear score shows it as closed from feb 2017 but a ballance owing. i get quite confused trying to understand them

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't give dates for when you started the card with Tesco, nor the last time you made a payment. Are they sending you annual statements of payments paid and the amount owed each year? I was looking back to see if any of your previous posts were about sending a CCA to Tesco but can find few of your earlier posts so I am wondering if you did try at some time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry i have just seen an error on the original post it should say 2015 not 2005 that’s my mistake.

 

in 2013 i took out the cards and kept everything in order up to my breakdown, and until 2016 august payment was less than they required. This was mostly due to the balance transfer offer coming to an end.

 

I started corresponding with them around March 2017 this was after some time being on my medication. I had correspondence of them but i never had to my knowledge a statement of payments.

I can’t remember when it was passed to Fredrickson but I continued to write to Tesco up until Feb this year and still haven’t received a reply. i still have had no statements from them regarding my account

Edited by shedder101
add

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the Consumer Credit act of 2006 s86c and 86d was introduced.

 

From then on anyone in arrears had to be sent an annual statement outlining how much the current arrears stood at.

 

Failure to do means that until the creditor sends it they cannot charge interest on the amount nor can they enforce the debt [ie take you to Court.].

 

So do not write to them asking for a statement- just remember the situation.

 

As I am not sure when you went into arrears with Tesco perhaps a year has not yet elapsed.

 

PS Don't beat yourself up about the date [2005 2015]. If people were not supposed to make mistakes they wouldn't have put rubbers on the end of pencils.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL as my wife says I am hopeless.

I stopped the min payment on Aug 2016 I was paying an amount less than the min, this continued showing on the credit report as up to 5 months late before it went into default in feb 2016.

 

Since then as I said what happened in the previous post, I have not received any statement from Tesco, when on my Noddle credit report the account shows as open and a default every month, balance fig stays the same, and on clear score it says its closed.

 

But I have looked through the file the last correspondence from Tesco was in Jan 2017

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes all fredrickson i will keep ignoring them as having read on the site they have no more powers than Harry Potter.

 

but i will keep my eye out should the take it to court

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good. Not sure how long Frederickson's have owned your debt but if more than a year, they cannot take you to Court until they start including the annual statements.

Just in case you don't know they are part of the Lowell Group you've seen them off so this bunch should be easier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore freds they only chase dont buy

 

Ofcourse they Lowell can do court regardless of statement s

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been through all the letters sent to me from Tesco, and I can’t find an annual statement but, my monthly statements were on line so I assume the statements might be.

 

I cannot get access on line and haven’t been able too since they sent me the default letter, late 2016 then every month I had another default letter and an you are in arrears letter as well.

 

I then sent a letter disputing the amount of the debt in March 2017 because late fees were added. I explained in a letter my problems, but heard nothing from them for 4 months, when a letter from the complaints department upheld their position and the fees stood.

 

The rest of the time I heard nothing till the first call from Fredric, end of Jan this year. I wrote to Tesco to ask who they were, they said they were handing over to Fredric and I should contact them for anything to do with the account.

 

I have had many ,many calls and text from Frederickson’s some different numbers to catch you out and always a recorded message tell me to contact them.

 

The one letter I have from them offers a discount if I pay up and in the box they state Tesco as the client.

 

I block and ignore all calls and text now, I have too or I start going down the depression hole, the entrance is to close for comfort at the moment.

 

Can I just keep ignoring them?

What do you think the next step should be?

I know if I do fall down it will take some time before I will be in a position to handle it.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then send tesco an sar if you dont have access to the statements

Can you confirm who freds state are their client on their letter and what date it was please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you go get your credit file and see whos shown as the owner of this debt.

I have my suspicions its not been sold and freds are merely chasing for Tesco's.

 

and the fact theres a discount smacks Tesco know theres something wrong with the balance. [penalty fees? PPI?]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it shows as Tesco debt on both clearscore and Noodle on clearscore its on the closed section on noodle it shows as default from 2016 to july 2018 each month they show it

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so tesco then

You can totally ignore freds or anyone until/unless tesco sell it on and you get a notice of assignment

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive made you a new thread on the MBNA write off in the MBNA forum as its important to publicise it

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?489428-Hope-when-mental-illness-strikes-MBNA-wrote-off-�13K-Card-Debt&489428-Hope-when-mental-illness-strikes-MBNA-wrote-off-�13K-Card-Debt=&p=5141630#post5141630

 

I've renames this thread to your tesco card so keep posting here about that

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...