Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dubai Debt through UK Courts - now Bank/IRDWW SD served


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 880 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys.

I have twice complained to the SRA and they have come back to me saying they are looking into it.

I even go my local MP involved and they emailed the SRA also.

I have also contacted the Daily Mail to see if they are interested in the story.

 

I will let you know the blog once it is up so we can all chat there and share stories.

Every time i ask the question to them about the jurisdiction they cannot answer.

 

 

Here is what i got back from My Coyle himself so you can see

 

- I am not the best person to express any views on the way the banks treat you and I can say that the sentiments you have expressed are not uncommon! ( so why are they representing these stupid banks then ) !!!

 

From a UK perspective, I can assure you that:

 

1. We are fully regulated in all our activities (including debt collection) by the Solicitors Regulation Authority;

 

2. In relation to our debt collection services we are exempt from direct regulation from the Financial Conduct Authority

– it’s a bit of a minefield,

but if you can access the FCA’s Perimeter Guidance Manual online,

you will find the solicitor’s exemption at 5 (b) of PERG 2.8.7C;

 

3. Tracing Services are no longer regulated by the FCA at all (under the previous Office of Fair Trading regime, debt collection companies, but not solicitors, were regulated) but our services are carried out in line with the Code of Practice issued by the Credit Services Association which itself ensures compliance with our statutory obligations under the Data Protection Act;

 

We are handling thousands of accounts here (RAK Bank is one of 10 banks we act for in the middle east) and, regrettably but inevitably, the service which bank customers receive is not as pristine as you might expect if you were buying a new car, or anything else more pleasant for that matter.

 

My job is to ensure that our banking team work ethically, compliantly and efficiently for the benefit of our banking clients. Sometimes, I’m afraid, the volume of traffic being handled by our team does not allow for every single question posed by a bank customer to be answered. That appears to be the case here but I’m more than happy to answer any additional queries you have over the telephone if you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CWD have to be very careful how they issue any court claims, if they have agreed any contract to share debt collection proceeds with a bank.

 

 

If you look into what happened with ACS Law who had a 50/50 deal with copyright holders, it led to a very unhappy ending.

 

 

There are rules regarding Solicitors who benefit from any claims they bring and they have to advise the court plus defendants of this.

 

 

To issue a claim in the name of a client bank only is not being totally transparent with all parties involved.

There are also rules that SRA apply where Solicitors sign such agreements with clients.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hello everyone it’s beem a while. Any updates. I have seen now IDRWW operated by Mr Coyle of CWD are active and have already contacted me with the usual BS

I’ve contacted again the FCA and also local MP as I feel 2019 should be raise awareness if these companies not following the rules

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be best to stick to your own thread instead of running around every UAE thread panicking about nothing.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if everyone stuck to their own thread

99% of these threads would be 2 posts long. = no ignore!

 

if you look at nearly ALL UAE threads

its the world and his oyster going around saying hows it going on every threads they can find relating to their issue.

 

you posts are all here now on your own thread.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I don't contribute to the thread, but out of curiosity, why and how anyone would run into hundred of thousand of debt in a country where having bad debts is worse than murder?

After falling behind the first thousand, wouldn't a reasonable person try to clear the debt rather than pile up hundreds more?

Or is it a common misconception that running abroad after a few years in luxury would clear the debt?

My friend left UAE in a rush, even left his 80k car in the airport car park because chased for his debts.

He keeps moving from place to place and country to country in Europe, laughing at the UAE banks and thinking that they'll forget about him.

Instead they seem to have eyes everywhere and find him within weeks of moving every time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and theres stuff all they can do.

 

many just like your friend had to get out...and quick..we know why most of the time:madgrin:

just don't be journalist..

 

UAE then inflate the debt with unbelievable int rates..most of which suddenly disappear when fronted.

 

nuff said..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true, but the constant bother of receiving calls, emails, letters etc is a real pain.

Without considering that at any point our bright politicians could struck a deal with them to make the debts enforceable.

You never know.

Personally I would never even dream to visit such countries even if they offered me a free holiday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no 'deal' with UAE..

 

what he is suffering is what they do to everyone...and if there was 'a deal' then it would come under our laws..but there isn't and that is why they get away with all these threats and blatant harassment.

 

no one can stop it..but no-one should ever eact to it...ignore..document carefully.. then use it when the time comes..and it will..

there are more political things behind my simple comment of just don't be journalist..than meets the eye..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Dealt with CWD a few years back and after advice from dx100uk I’ve never heard from them again.

 

9 years of abuse from Dubai collections agencies I’ve managed to deal with them also. Now IDRWW tried there luck but  have told them unless they purchase the debt and it’s taken to court please don’t contact me.

Debt is at 500,000aed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget to update your thread too then..:madgrin:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Not as embarrassing as being sat in work and having a fax come though to your director saying they are searching for me as I owe money !

 

Then my partner at work which is how she found out.

 

That said 9 years I have battled them all and will continue.

 

As for CWD and IDRWW there will come a time and I am happy to stand up them all with a group of all of us. 

 

I’m still trying with local MPs and FO

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am going to raise this again with the FO tomorrow and my local MP.

This is not on at all and no way fair.

 

I am also going to message all my contacts at step change and other debt charities to let them know this. 

 

Regardless of situation it cannot be right that they allow a debt to be collected here that has not even been passed in the courts in the UAE firstly and then using ruthless agents who go against all collection laws possible.

Double standards ! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Just to update everyone. 

I have contacted the BBC watchdog (I have a contact there)

also sent letter to SRA and the FO and ccd in all step change etc. I feel they all need to know this story in a sense that Cwd and IDRWW are not acting fairly in someways. 

 

I also received this message from an advice person high up Quoting

 

Thank you for your email.

 

“A non-UK creditor can contact you in the UK, either directly or by using UK-based agents to collect the debt. They also may be able to take action using the UK courts. To do this they would usually need to get a court judgement (the equivalent of the CCJ/decree) in UAE first, then start a second claim in the UK and get a judgement before they can enforce the debt.

 

If a debt originates outside of the UK it is not likely to be covered by UK regulators or ombudsmen, so if there are any legal disputes you will need specialist help. We would suggest getting independent legal advice from Citizens Advice Bureau or the Law Centre.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that explainsit ..since when have they ever done anything but make debtors blindly pay debts thru them anyway..

they don't even check debts enforceability when they sign people up to their plans..

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve fired an email this morning again and copied in the SRA, Step change, FO And the FCA.

I will continue to send this until I am heard.

 

I will not have Mr Coyle and his partners (ones who called me at my work and were working as debt collectors under the CWD name) get away with acting unlawfully knowing full well people here do not know the full story of debt in Dubai. 

 

The SRA especially need to do some research into this and instruct somehow those judges who sit in small claims courts to understand there is a lot more to this story and believe me there is plenty. 

 

It cannot go unnoticed any longer and not allow CWD to win these cases without anyone knowing the full story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SRA wont do anything. The solicitor is just being a good boy and being told to do as ordered.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

My last correspondence with IDRWW was in January of this year and after my last letter saying to them telling them to show me what you can do or indeed get Mr Coyle from CWD to get in touch then I will reply I have heard nothing again.

 

I want for the next round from them or the others from Dubai its a fun game (also all other debt collection agencies in Dubai which seemed to have backed off a little )

 

I am the same 11 years ago from Dubai now and 6 years ago someone from CWD (when they were getting excited and starting out) had the cheek to call me at work to which I took them to the cleaners !! for breaking every rule possible.

 

It was only when i seen an email then from IDRWW using there offices that I knew what he was trying to do 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I’m fighting IDRWW and CWD and I’m looking into taking CWD to court also for their 9 years of unprofessional abuse on the back of DCA in Dubai also.

 

Latest update is I received an email from IDRWW one Mr Letheren who was also with CWD who contacted me in 2014 so I’m guessing he’s moved over to IDRWW.

 

The email contained a document that you cannot open and have to request a pin !! 

 

Ive repeatedly told them I will not entertain anything until this debt has been bought with all 4 banks and they issue court summons then I shall file my defence with 9 years of evidence from the abuse received. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I think it maybe only a matte of time for me also although different circumstances 

 

on another note after 3 years the FO have finally acknowledged my complaint and the daily mail and the FO have written to Mr Coyle and indeed IDR.

 

It seems that now they are using solicitors as debt collectors without titles and without signing off emails very shady and very dodgy ! 

 

I will certainly update you once I get my feedback 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...