Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi again all, below is another email they sent me, I just don't want to get in trouble or things to get worse with this crowd but I am taking your advice here. Anyway advice would be appreciated.   I am contacting you again after having tried to contact you both by email on 03/04/2024 and 10/04/2024, and by telephone on 10/04/2024 and 17/04/2024 to discuss the matter in relation to the regularization of the SOLIDWORKS case against xxx our company.   This is an urgent legal matter. Please contact me at your earliest convenience - +44 2921 920 296.    If we do not recieve a response before 24/04/2024, we will assume that you are not willing to settle this dispute amicably. The case will then be referred back to our client with whom, ultimately, the final decision lies on the enforcement of their intellectual property rights.    Yours sincerel y, Rhys
    • If you do get a letter of Claim and or Pre Action Protocol pack 15. Where there has been non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction, the court may order that (a) the parties are relieved of the obligation to comply or further comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (b) the proceedings are stayed while particular steps are taken to comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (c) sanctions are to be applied. 16. The court will consider the effect of any non-compliance when deciding whether to impose any sanctions which may include— (a) an order that the party at fault pays the costs of the proceedings, or part of the costs of the other party or parties; (b) an order that the party at fault pay those costs on an indemnity basis; (c) if the party at fault is a claimant who has been awarded a sum of money, an order depriving that party of interest on that sum for a specified period, and/or awarding interest at a lower rate than would otherwise have been awarded; (d) if the party at fault is a defendant, and the claimant has been awarded a sum of money, an order awarding interest on that sum for a specified period at a higher rate, (not exceeding 10% above base rate), than the rate which would otherwise have been awarded. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct   .
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Thanks all! My wife was driving at the time (took our daughter to get new school uniform) and I wasn't there so I'm not sure what the signage was actually like, but yes, Parkopedia says 2:30, so it's barely over that. I will check it out with her when she gets home later, I haven't even told her about this yet as she'll probably be quite upset. So - likely my best response at this stage is to just wait it out until a Letter Before Claim arrives?
    • check mcol does it state DQ N180 sent to you? if it does then: https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5088148 3 copies yes to mediation (unless you filed our Statute Barred Defence OR this is a claim for a Private Parking Ticket) 1 wit you Suitability for determination without a hearing? no (that the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally') the rest is obv 1 to the court 1 to their sols (omit phone/sig/email) if no sols send to claimant 1 for your file   dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Economic domestic abuse - HSBC demanding I pay back £9.5k debt from identity fraud by abusive ex


90sbornincog
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1991 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was in a relationship with a man who was both physically and emotionally abusive.

He had used my bank account to commit fraud and HSBC held me liable for the debt from the fraud which is £9,566.

I managed to find another place to move to and made sure I was virtually untraceable on social media and the internet.

 

I never told the police about the abuse at the time for fear of him being arrested then released and onto me.

However I did report the fraud to the police through Action Fraud and they replied a few months later saying that they cannot follow up on it as there is not enough evidence.

 

Now HSBC are harassing me to pay back the debt,

I'm a 22 year old student who cannot pay back such a large amount.

 

Although I am terrified of him I tried to locate him so the police can find him yet he is nowhere to be found and I believe now that he had been using a fake identity whilst with me.

 

HSBC have been immensely unhelpful,

I have gone back and forth into branches and made numerous phone calls which have all been useless and I cannot take out debt relief management plans or file for bankruptcy because the debt is from fraud.

 

They also filed a CIFAS flag marker against my name so I have to use an online bank now and will not be able to get jobs in many sectors when I finish uni, for 6 years.

 

I opened a case with the Financial Ombudsman which is taking a long time but have been studying hundreds of their decisions on similar cases and they never rule in the favour of the victim/consumer, so I am not confident.

 

What do I do?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There - Welcome to CAG - This is a lot to take in.

How long has your case been with the FOS?

 

What happened when you complained to the Bank itself?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reported it to FOS in May after receiving a final response from HSBC where they said they were not budging and this would be their last response to me on the matter.

 

They said my secure key was used and therefore believed it was me authorising the transactions

I was not able to supply the FOS with the original HSBC responses to my complaint so it took some time for them to retrieve it themselves from HSBC.

 

I rang them up a few days ago they said it is a priority case but they have yet to assign an adjucator to contact me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There - Do you have the letter from Actionfraud...

How confident would you feel to go beyond the FOS towards potentially taken HSBC to the legal stage?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont need a lot of money for legal action :) - You actually can bring a claim against HSBC yourself.

But we need to know the full story of what happened?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the beginning I received a phone call around the end of September last year from what I believed to be HSBC.

I believed that it was a customer service agent from the Safeguard team asking security questions as he said the online system needs to be updated,

 

he was very convincing as he said my username i.e already knew it which now I realise that my ex must have seen me logging into my internet banking when he was with me. I believe that number spoofing was used as I did recognise the number to be from HSBC and I did not know that this spoofing technique existed until after the fraud occurred.

 

My ex used to say that his phone was broken, malfunctioning or did not have enough credit so would use mine often however I would always unlock the screen for him. It came to the point where he became agitated and insisted that I add his fingerprint to my Touch ID and give him my lock screen password. I said no and then he got physical with me, accusing me of cheating on him and all sorts. I caved in and did as he wished. Now my idiotic self used my lock screen password as my HSBC digital secure key password so that I can remember it more easily, but of course I never thought that he would use my banking or do any sort of fraud.

 

To my horror one day in late October last year I discovered my account was blocked when I logged in.

I immediately called HSBC asking why this was going on, and they told me I had to come into a branch for a meeting.

 

When I went in they showed me a fraudulent cheque for the amount £9,566 had been paid into my account 3 days before and the money sent to two random accounts. I was in complete shock and extremely confused. At this point I did not suspect my boyfriend was involved but told them of the phone call from a few weeks before and they said they would carry out an investigation.

 

Come January HSBC sent me a letter saying that they were closing my account and wanted me to pay back £10,566 (£1000 of it my student overdraft).

I spent the rest of my days in and out of branches and making numerous phone calls protesting my innocence to no avail. I had already contacted the police and directed to Action Fraud who I filed a report with and awaited their response.

 

I filed a complaint with HSBC and received a response in March where they essentially said they believed I authorised the transactions and to go to the FOS if I was unhappy with their response. I complained to the FOS and it took them time as the original customer help assistant got confused and thought I had not complained to HSBC already so contacted them on my behalf, HSBC responded in May with their final response saying that as the secure key was used I authorised the transactions and they would not discuss this again.

 

It was at this point that I was certain that my evil ex was involved because my secure key was on my phone and he was the only other person who had access to my phone, he also conveniently disappeared not too long after the fraud occurred which was a relief for me because I did not know how to leave him. I was still terrified of him though since he knew where I lived and although I am in a new residence I do have fear that he could see me anywhere. I took the final response to the FOS and it has now been months for them to assign an adjucator, they sent me a letter last week saying that as the case is complex it will take longer than anticipated.

Edited by 90sbornincog
Link to post
Share on other sites

urm.. something not sitting rigt with me here.

I doubt this fraus was anything to do with your ex

sounds like the std acam that these jokers pull on just about any bank account

once they get access to it

they transfer in money

then transfer is out

and the funds then turnout to be bogus.

 

happens 1000's of times a day one just about every consumer program there is.

you got sc@mmed by a faker on the phone... and you fell for it.

nothing to do with your ex.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I am 100% sure that my ex was involved.

I believe that those who called me and involved are a team that he has links to

 

How come he just happened to disappear not long after the fraud?

How I know that it is definitely him is that in the final response from HSBC they said that my digital secure key was used for the transactions.

My digital secure key is on my phone.

The only other person who had access to my mobile was him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you in all this written to the HSBC CEO?

 

there are numerous examples on the net , even with the digital secure key, that this type of thing happens without the need of a third party revealing it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you in all this written to the HSBC CEO?

 

there are numerous examples on the net , even with the digital secure key, that this type of thing happens without the need of a third party revealing it.

How does one get a hold of the HSBC CEO? Does he respond to these letters?

 

I am sure that he had set me up and the fact that he cannot be found anywhere suggests his identity was fake which is typical of fraudsters. I know in my bones that he had something to do with this, he is that nasty character capable of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ceoemail.com

 

lets put it this way..

I bet the call you received to your phone from the supposed HSBC Safeguard team, was to the same phone that had your digital keys on?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.hoax-slayer.net/hsbc-safeguard-update-phishing-[problem]/

 

I bet your bottom dollar you or him clicked on the link in the email and your read/do email on the same phone too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did actually get an email like this, but I knew it was fake and did not enter my information in it. I read my email on the phone sometimes but mostly on my laptop.

 

Sorry I only just read your signature as I was viewing on mobile version and just clicked view classic full site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the second case I have heard about in the last month involving economic domestic abuse and which was referred to the financial ombudsman service and in which they cause delays and made errors and eventually blamed it all on the fact that they thought that the case was "complex". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486569-Unlawfully-withdrawn-Mortgage-Reserve-Account&p=5118964#post5118964

 

 

I think that this tells you a lot about the financial ombudsman service. It is out of touch and it is certainly not handling economic domestic abuse cases appropriately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand a huge amount about the digital secure key et cetera, but for the moment I have to say that I am broadly the same mind as site team member dx100uk.

 

It seems to me if you can establish that your abusive ex was not involved then you have a much better chance of getting it resolved in your favour.

 

I'm interested in this fraudulent cheque. Who paid the cheque in? Do you have a copy of it? Can you get a copy of it? You say the money was paid out to 2 random accounts. Do you have any information about these accounts?

 

Are you saying that a cheque was paid in to your account and before it was fully cleared, your bank allowed money to be drawn against it and sent to random accounts?

 

Have you tried sending an SAR to the bank? Have you tried sending an SAR to the FOS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know who paid the cheque in. I did retrieve a copy of the cheque. I do not know these two random accounts and I did not recognise their names.

 

Yes the bank let money be drawn against the funds before it was fully cleared.

 

I was not aware that you could send an SAR to the bank and FOS, but I will go ahead and do that, thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you could post up a copy of the cheque on this forum in PDF format and also give us details of the two accounts which received the money. You never know, it might strike the bell with somebody.

 

Send the SARs off immediately. I can imagine that the bank may object because they will say that there is a CIFAS marker and they are not obliged to comply – but you may as well start and then we will see what happens.

 

It may be a blessing in disguise that the FOS is dragging their feet because this is likely to impede the bank from bringing a claim against you for the recovery of the money.

 

One of your problems is that the sum claimed is apparently over £10,000. This means that it is no longer a small claim and you do not benefit from the small claims rules. He will be treated as a fast track claim.

 

Is the debt still attracting interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...