Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
    • Please post up their letter so we understand what they've asked. You need to cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • Hello,  I received the standard letter.  I don't understand No. 3: If this is in relation to a ticket irregularity, then if you were unable to produce a pass because you did not have it with you or if your pass was withdrawn because you were unable to produce a valid photocard to accompany it, please enclose a photocopy of the pass/photocard with your reply. Question: do i enclose my photocard? my partner's freedom pass was confiscated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Opodo doubled the flight prices overnight!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Found a cracking flight price yesterday on opodo for next year so I booked it.... Paid with credit card etc.

 

Had an email this morning telling me that the price has gone up and its now double.

 

So I phoned them.

Usual rubbish.

Price has increased from the time you booked blah blah blah.

Surely all these searches are online/live anyway?

I think pretty much it was a pricing error to be honest...

 

Is this legal?

Anyone could offer cheap flights, rope the customer in, get the credit card payment then say, oops the price has gone up....

 

Do I have any recourse other than to pay the new price or cancel?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can cancel.

Also, as I did with last minute, report them to ico for obtaining details by deception.

Do a mock booking up to the point of payment without inserting credit card details and using fake name.

Take screenshots of every page along the booking.

If it is like lastminute, nowhere they tell you that it's not a booking but an enquiry.

So they harvest your personal details without reason.

Also, they take your money and then it takes 2 weeks to process a refund.

So in other words they have millions of pounds interest free loans from customers.

Call your bank and reverse the charges, then report them to ico.

Also plaster social media with your experience, highlighting that they don't do bookings but enquiries.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't intend to cancel because the revised price is still good but not as good.

 

But I see what you mean - if I wanted to cancel I daresay it'd take a while to get the refund.

 

But yes as you say they're saying I've made a booking request and the price has changed which is why the original is no longer valid.

 

To be honest, it was VERY cheap so I think it was a pricing error anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

funny thing about these pricing errors is that the comapny still gets your business. they shoudl ahve just automatically refunded the payent as they were stating an error and so no obligation on their part to continue with the contract.

I agree with kingy that this seems like a wheeze to get your interest and then hold your detaisl and use that to see what they can get away with charging rather than making a genuine offer or even a genuine mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a feeling they could claim "mistake" and get away with it.

 

But their mistake benefits them. They can hold on to your money for a few weeks before refunding it or, like you said, charge what they like on top now - they've already roped you in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like DCA's they will undoubtedly tell lies to the ICO when you complain and the cost of a proper investigation for an end result that yields very little wont be keenly accepted.

 

many years ago all sport on Sky was free but they decided to try a subscription only showing of a boxing match.

They were resigned to the fact that no-one would pay but surprised themselves with how many people were dumb enough to pay up.

This set the scene for ever.

 

Same goes for hospital parking charges.

It was first tried out at Kettering General many years ago with the excuse that people parked there to walk to work rather than paying to use the council P&D.

 

Utter rubbish as the hospital was more than a mile away from anywhere but people meekly paid up instead of ignoring the meters and so we have it throughout the whole country when it could have been killed in week 1 by a payment boycott.

 

By not cancelling and demanding your refund you have not only made a rod for your own back you encourage the company to continue as they are.

getting them to delete your data costs them time and thus money so they would have to change their ways if enough people did it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't give you the original price, so unless you like being mugged off, get an instant refund and cause as much trouble as possible.

With my lastminute case, a few days later I got a better price directly from the airline website.

Nowadays most airlines guarantee best price, so all other travel websites are just fishing to get free loans and/or mug people off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its get worse. After booking flights for £190 I get email 12 hours later asking me to ring because price is £410.

 

I spoke to them yesterday moaned but agreed to £410. This morning I've got another email telling me its £880 now!

 

Scandalous. Its way expensive now so I'm on a mission now to complain where I can.

 

Suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

GET A REFUND IMMEDIATELY BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!!!

(Deliberately using capitals here)

I doubt they'll give you the money now, after you accepted to be mugged off, so get in touch with your cc company and cancel the transaction as fraudulent.

See my previous post for following steps.

Then, if you're happy to be ripped off, let me have your contact details... I have lots of deals going on 😂😂😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi paulfoel

 

Did you actually receive a Confirmation Email with your Booking Number from Opodo? (as it states in there T&C at 2.6): https://www.opodo.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi paulfoel

 

Did you actually receive a Confirmation Email with your Booking Number from Opodo? (as it states in there T&C at 2.6): https://www.opodo.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/

 

No thats just it. Opodo are saying until its confirmed they can do what they want.

 

Offered me £300 in vouchers now though. BUT I can still see the same cheap flights for £190. Migth book again and see if they cancel again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have been told what to do.Stop faffing about before its to late.Should have got e refund when they upped the price

 

They will take ages to refund you Do a section 75 transaction reverse with Amex.

 

Get on thier social media pages and complain they will normall produce results

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...