Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Opodo doubled the flight prices overnight!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1991 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Found a cracking flight price yesterday on opodo for next year so I booked it.... Paid with credit card etc.

 

Had an email this morning telling me that the price has gone up and its now double.

 

So I phoned them.

Usual rubbish.

Price has increased from the time you booked blah blah blah.

Surely all these searches are online/live anyway?

I think pretty much it was a pricing error to be honest...

 

Is this legal?

Anyone could offer cheap flights, rope the customer in, get the credit card payment then say, oops the price has gone up....

 

Do I have any recourse other than to pay the new price or cancel?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can cancel.

Also, as I did with last minute, report them to ico for obtaining details by deception.

Do a mock booking up to the point of payment without inserting credit card details and using fake name.

Take screenshots of every page along the booking.

If it is like lastminute, nowhere they tell you that it's not a booking but an enquiry.

So they harvest your personal details without reason.

Also, they take your money and then it takes 2 weeks to process a refund.

So in other words they have millions of pounds interest free loans from customers.

Call your bank and reverse the charges, then report them to ico.

Also plaster social media with your experience, highlighting that they don't do bookings but enquiries.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't intend to cancel because the revised price is still good but not as good.

 

But I see what you mean - if I wanted to cancel I daresay it'd take a while to get the refund.

 

But yes as you say they're saying I've made a booking request and the price has changed which is why the original is no longer valid.

 

To be honest, it was VERY cheap so I think it was a pricing error anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

funny thing about these pricing errors is that the comapny still gets your business. they shoudl ahve just automatically refunded the payent as they were stating an error and so no obligation on their part to continue with the contract.

I agree with kingy that this seems like a wheeze to get your interest and then hold your detaisl and use that to see what they can get away with charging rather than making a genuine offer or even a genuine mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a feeling they could claim "mistake" and get away with it.

 

But their mistake benefits them. They can hold on to your money for a few weeks before refunding it or, like you said, charge what they like on top now - they've already roped you in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like DCA's they will undoubtedly tell lies to the ICO when you complain and the cost of a proper investigation for an end result that yields very little wont be keenly accepted.

 

many years ago all sport on Sky was free but they decided to try a subscription only showing of a boxing match.

They were resigned to the fact that no-one would pay but surprised themselves with how many people were dumb enough to pay up.

This set the scene for ever.

 

Same goes for hospital parking charges.

It was first tried out at Kettering General many years ago with the excuse that people parked there to walk to work rather than paying to use the council P&D.

 

Utter rubbish as the hospital was more than a mile away from anywhere but people meekly paid up instead of ignoring the meters and so we have it throughout the whole country when it could have been killed in week 1 by a payment boycott.

 

By not cancelling and demanding your refund you have not only made a rod for your own back you encourage the company to continue as they are.

getting them to delete your data costs them time and thus money so they would have to change their ways if enough people did it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't give you the original price, so unless you like being mugged off, get an instant refund and cause as much trouble as possible.

With my lastminute case, a few days later I got a better price directly from the airline website.

Nowadays most airlines guarantee best price, so all other travel websites are just fishing to get free loans and/or mug people off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its get worse. After booking flights for £190 I get email 12 hours later asking me to ring because price is £410.

 

I spoke to them yesterday moaned but agreed to £410. This morning I've got another email telling me its £880 now!

 

Scandalous. Its way expensive now so I'm on a mission now to complain where I can.

 

Suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

GET A REFUND IMMEDIATELY BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!!!

(Deliberately using capitals here)

I doubt they'll give you the money now, after you accepted to be mugged off, so get in touch with your cc company and cancel the transaction as fraudulent.

See my previous post for following steps.

Then, if you're happy to be ripped off, let me have your contact details... I have lots of deals going on 😂😂😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi paulfoel

 

Did you actually receive a Confirmation Email with your Booking Number from Opodo? (as it states in there T&C at 2.6): https://www.opodo.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi paulfoel

 

Did you actually receive a Confirmation Email with your Booking Number from Opodo? (as it states in there T&C at 2.6): https://www.opodo.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/

 

No thats just it. Opodo are saying until its confirmed they can do what they want.

 

Offered me £300 in vouchers now though. BUT I can still see the same cheap flights for £190. Migth book again and see if they cancel again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have been told what to do.Stop faffing about before its to late.Should have got e refund when they upped the price

 

They will take ages to refund you Do a section 75 transaction reverse with Amex.

 

Get on thier social media pages and complain they will normall produce results

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...