Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

E.ON..Status, outstanding balance and current balance of data shares


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

I have an Energy Company giving data shares to a Credit Agency but the shares are not showing the outstanding amount or reduction in what's been paid every month. I was under the impression that to avoid breaching GDPR certain parts of the data share should include this to show a true reflection of the account and so other potential lenders could see where the account was up to etc. Some months inbetween others they wouldn't give any information!

 

When I queried this with the Energy Company they then started showing the shares as an 'i' which I believe stands for Arranged Payment.

Ok, so does that mean they can just show a status of AP every month still with no current balance and outstanding balance?

 

How are other lenders meant to see when this will end?

They also shared information via the Credit Agency during the dispute I raised that said I was responsible for the supply at the address with incorrect dates. As that's been sent to the Credit Agency in response to my dispute, would that breach GDPR?

Edited by Lelah
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO no.

 

whats in the calendar section cannot be seen by anyone bar you and the company

 

its what is in the summary line lenders see.

 

so is this debt defaulted or what does it day the status is?

 

AP marker is a killer as it never goes away.

ideally the provider should have defaulted the debt after your third missed/short payment.

but since 2014 theres been not even a guideline that states this.

 

who's the provider

 

moved to the Utils forum.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk I wasn't sure which section of the forums to put this in.

 

I think the problem for me is not having known whats seen by lenders.

I assumed it was more than just the name of the company, type of lending and the status.

 

The Energy Company won't update my new address on their data shares so the account they opened with the credit agency is showing from my old address!

Can the address be seen by others?

 

In short, what can the lender see?

What's the summary line?

I'm a complete novice to what's shown on Credit Files I've had a pristine Credit File for the last 30 years.

 

They changed the data shares to AP on purpose as I complained that I'd been told the errors they made wouldn't affect my credit and they suddenly wanted me to change my payment plan which I refused as I hadn't done anything wrong or defaulted on the one I was on.

 

I was only on it because when I left their supply I had a case with the Ombudsman about other errors which was still ongoing and which I won.

After that the Energy Company tried to charge me for the new owners electricity and all that took time to get the final bill sorted and correct.

 

By the time they'd managed to revise the final bill it was over 6 months so they delayed their own payments.

It was more than I could pay in one go as I was a quarterly payer.

 

I've now found they owe me money, its with the Ombudsman for a second time....grrrrr!

Had they charged me properly in the first place I wouldn't have needed to pay in instalments, they could have had it in one go so alas, now they've wrecked my Credit File.

 

What do you mean about the AP never goes away?

Edited by Lelah
Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to say, the Energy Company is E.ON and I've never defaulted on any payments to them.

They offered me £100 for making a mess of my credit file but they refused to remove the AP, they said they were entitled to show it that way.

 

All this happened because they made an error and sent me a default letter when I'd never defaulted.

They clearly then didn't want to admit that original error but had to.

They'd never shared with the Credit Agency ever, until that letter sent in error.

Edited by Lelah
Link to post
Share on other sites

aha you've a running complaint with the ombudsman

is this the FOS or the Energy one?

 

if the markers are not a true reflection of how YOU operated that account, then that needs to be part of your complaint.

 

if they now say well you didn't owe the money at that time the markers should go.

 

as for the address that's not correct either they must update your file with the correct address regardless to when you took it out.

 

the summary line is the stuff that's NOT in the silly calendar section, [that to all intent and purpose cannot be seen by anyone bar you and them.]

 

its the statute of the account is the important stuff that lenders can see ie take out date whats now owing etc

 

if these are wrong then a complaint needs to be made.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right E.ON

we have a rep here i'll give them a shout.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't need 10 posts read upload..pdf!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Lelah and welcome to CAG.

 

 

It sounds like you're having a bit of nightmare with us and I'm sorry it's taking so long to sort out. As this is now with the Energy Ombudsman there's little I can say at this point. We need to wait for the Ombudsman's decision and do what they say within 28 days of their ruling. This decision is binding on us but not on you leaving you free to seek further advice and assistance if necessary.

 

 

Generally, when we share with a Credit Reference Agency we give them a true reflection of the status of an account at the time of the share. You're right, when we share an 'I' this shows there's an Arrangement to Pay set up at the time of the share. We continue to share this for the duration of an agreement. Other things shared include the customer name and home address, the date the E.ON account started, current balance, any default notices and debt that might apply and, where relevant, the date the account closed. This information is available for other lenders to see.

 

 

 

We've a specialist team who look after everything to do with the way we share information with Credit Reference Agencies. They'll be helping to resolve your complaint.

 

 

Sorry again for all the hassle you're going through with us Lelah and that I'm unable to help personally.

 

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

right E.ON

we have a rep here i'll give them a shout.

 

 

Thanks for heads up dx. Regrettably, as this is with the Energy Ombudsman, other than giving some general information there's little I can comment on.

 

 

Thanks again and sorry I can't do more.

 

 

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's ok glad you can show insight..

 

it makes it available and your presence ..on the site shows ...later people will read and hopefully will get things moving using you people before it gets too far if they have issues

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Lelah and welcome to CAG.

 

 

It sounds like you're having a bit of nightmare with us and I'm sorry it's taking so long to sort out. As this is now with the Energy Ombudsman there's little I can say at this point. We need to wait for the Ombudsman's decision and do what they say within 28 days of their ruling. This decision is binding on us but not on you leaving you free to seek further advice and assistance if necessary. Also what if the start date is wrong?

 

 

Generally, when we share with a Credit Reference Agency we give them a true reflection of the status of an account at the time of the share.

You're right, when we share an 'I' this shows there's an Arrangement to Pay set up at the time of the share.

We continue to share this for the duration of an agreement.

 

Other things shared include the customer name and home address, the date the E.ON account started, current balance, any default notices and debt that might apply and, where relevant, the date the account closed. This information is available for other lenders to see.

 

We've a specialist team who look after everything to do with the way we share information with Credit Reference Agencies. They'll be helping to resolve your complaint.

 

Sorry again for all the hassle you're going through with us Lelah and that I'm unable to help personally.

 

Malc

 

Thank you Malc.

Can I ask if the AP goes away when it's all paid off and settled?

Can I also ask if E.ON are only showing data shares with the i status (arranged payment) and a start date only, is that normal?

There is always a zero current balance and a zero outstanding balance.

 

I have to go on at E.ON to put the correct current balance in.

They've done it twice in the whole 10 months. That can't be right!

 

I've also asked for them up date to my new address since May and it still shows on my credit file under the old address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

which CRA are you using?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Malc.

Can I ask if the AP goes away when it's all paid off and settled?

Can I also ask if E.ON are only showing data shares with the i status (arranged payment) and a start date only, is that normal?

There is always a zero current balance and a zero outstanding balance.

 

I have to go on at E.ON to put the correct current balance in.

They've done it twice in the whole 10 months. That can't be right!

 

I've also asked for them up date to my new address since May and it still shows on my credit file under the old address.

 

 

Hello Lelah and thank you for coming back to me.

 

 

With the AP, we'll share an 'I' for the duration of the agreement. We'll continue to share this until the balance is zero.

 

 

For live accounts, the information about payment history is kept by Equifax for up to 10 years. For closed accounts, Equifax keep these records for 6 years.

 

 

There's more information on how we use personal data on our website at the following link.

 

 

www.eonenergy.com/fairprocessing

 

 

As I mentioned the other day, the current balance and home address are the subject of regular shares. To be honest, I don't know why this isn't happening for you. I suspect this forms part of the complaint you've raised and is being looked into as part of the resolution that's been referred to the Energy Ombudsman. If I'm right, we need to wait for the Ombudsman's ruling before advising further.

 

 

 

Sorry I'm limited in what I can say Lelah.

 

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the information Malc. May I send you a private message?

 

 

By all means Lelah.

 

 

 

Please be aware, as above, now the Energy Ombudsman's involved I'm unable to comment on anything related to your complaint. I'll be happy to give general information if that's of any help.

 

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The Ombudsman's decision is that E.ON should just issue an apology for Customer Service short falls.

 

Can the person who ignored your complaints and deliberately made errors (this was the Review Resolution Reviewer) be allowed to email you out of the blue to show you they now worked for the E.ON Ombudsman Liaison Team and be allowed to liaise on your case with the Ombudsman?

 

Isn't this a conflict of interest?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means Lelah.

 

 

 

Please be aware, as above, now the Energy Ombudsman's involved I'm unable to comment on anything related to your complaint. I'll be happy to give general information if that's of any help.

 

 

Malc

 

 

Thank you, I found what I needed so didn't need to after all. I'd be grateful if you could talk me through the 'I' that E.ON shares though. Is the 'I' a recognised status by Equifax as being an Arranged Payment status or is the 'I' just what E.ON calls the share when there's a payment plan in place?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I found what I needed so didn't need to after all. I'd be grateful if you could talk me through the 'I' that E.ON shares though. Is the 'I' a recognised status by Equifax as being an Arranged Payment status or is the 'I' just what E.ON calls the share when there's a payment plan in place?

 

Morning Lelah and glad you found what you needed.

 

The 'I' we share with Equifax is recognised by both of us as indicating there's an Arrangement to Pay set up at the time of the share. We continue to share this for the duration of an agreement.

 

Hope this explains.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...