Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Cabot - Santander current account overdraft and credit card


jims45
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a letter from Cabot Financial claiming they own an old debt of mine from four years ago amounting to £7800.

This debt may be genuine as I went through a very bad time during my divorce mentally and lost my business and home.

I thought all my debts were settled at that time so I would like to challenge them as my credit file shows no debt.

 

I have sent a prove it letter and would like to know my next step, a CCA request or SAR request should they persist.

 

I have read that sometimes unsecured debt cant be enforced because the relevant paperwork is lost, is that correct?

 

I am about to retire and have no assets.

 

Thanks in advance

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what's the debt please [original creditor/type of credit]

 

its pretty pointless in sending the prove it letter in todays climate.

 

and yes if they don't hold the required [and enforceable] paperwork under the CCA they are dead in the water.

 

tell us a bit more of the history of this debt [take out date etc etc] and are you saying this doesn't show on your credit file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for yout reply.

The debts are for Santander current account overdraft and credit card dating back to 2014. I had a period of homelessness and dropped of the radar for about 2 years but have now checked my credit score giving my last two adresses and there is nothing adverse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are all you old addresses showing as linked addresses on the credit file?

 

you say you opened these accounts in 2014?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to satans bank forum with addition to the title

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so at an old address but they now have your correct one so no backdoor CCJ's.

 

it might be prudent to send satans bank an sar its free an will get you everything they how on your inc statements

as I suspect the OD will be heavily inflated by unlawful fees and interest.

 

as for the credit card debt … lets see where they go with this

let them write

then it might be CCA time.

 

so you recon last payment dates or use by you of these two accounts was 2014?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes last payments in 2014 and I did a search, no CCJ'S at my old addresses. So I would send the SAR request to Santander not Cabot that claim they own the debts? Sorry im so clueless I read somewhere I have to include a postal order for a £1 for each SAR is that correct?

Really appreciate the help and I will be hitting the donate button:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 7

 

it might be prudent to send satans bank an SAR its free an will get you everything they how on your inc statements

 

twill also get you the card stuff too..but you don't tell cabot you have it...:wink:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sure you can.

 

thanks the donation too...:yo::yo:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update:

 

Cabot have replied to my "prove it" letter saying they acknowledge my dispute but the reference number for the alleged credit card debt is quoted, nothing about the Bank overdraft.

 

They state they will be conducting a thorough investigation and contact me within 5 weeks although the time frame is 16 weeks.

 

I am about to send the SAR request to Santander but I have no details of the accounts as I have been homeless and all the paperwork lost.

 

Cabot's letters just state "we own your accounts with Santander" no account numbers or details of any kind only balances.

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's ok you don't actually need any numbers,

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

Cabot have written to me again asking me to call them and stating "your account is no longer on hold", this refers to the Santander current account not the Credit card.

 

After checking I see they have now entered a default on my credit file dated 2010.

I have written to them stating all communication must be via Royal Mail and also reminding them I am disputing BOTH alleged debts,

I am requiring proof of debt purchase, account numbers and details of how the balances were calculated.

 

The SAR request has gone off to Santander should I send a SAR request to Cabot also or is it wise not to?

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

silly idea entering into stupid letter tennis.

don't ever write unless advised to do so

it only encourages the DCA to think they have some magical powers

they don't.

 

as for the default

nope only the OC can default a debt

and if the defaulted date in the summary of the debt is 2010 it should not even be showing on your credit file.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well get reading up..

 

default?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been doing some checking into this.

Family member reminded me I had a current account separate to my main current account I thought this was closed and the balance cleared at the time of the divorce and house sale..seems not.

 

Reading my credit file a second time the account was opened in 2010 and the last payment was in 2015 yet there is nothing about missed payments just shows a balance outstanding.

 

Be interesting to see what the SAR from Santander shows up.

Would be ironic if some of the balance is PPI payments.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

well you cant have missed payments as such on an OD as theres not set schedule.

there might be a defaulted date but hats good as it means the account will go on the defaults 6th birthday.

 

probably unlawful charges for being O/L or something.

or ruddy fees for bogus insurance packages they sold for you budgie or mobile phone or taking a cat abroad in te EU.

 

packaged account fees.

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received a letter from Cabot,

they have completely ignored my requests for information about the Current account

 

Regarding the Credit card they have this to say:

"Unfortunately we do not have the relevant information on file so we will be requesting a copy of your credit agreement and terms conditions from your original lender as well as a statement of account which can take some time"

 

Then the line:

The account may be on your credit file and this could affect your ability to get credit, apply for a mortgage or a phone contract. Even if we are unable to supply your paperwork, this account will remain on your credit file for six years from the date the default was registered"

 

Does this mean they are not expecting to find the paperwork for the Credit card and why are they ignoring requests for information about the overdraft?

 

So happy I found this site!:oops:

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Let it run

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some news re: Current account.

Cabot wrote to me saying at this time Santander don't have the requested documentation and the debt is unenforceable unless the documentation becomes available in the future, (but they would still like paying). I notice this letter appears to have come from a different department and now quotes the OL account number.

Sit tight and see what happens with the Credit card account now I guess?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

shame the fleecers have lost 50% of their free xmas party booze party money out of you already :)

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...