Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Working Hours Including Sleepovers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2006 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. The usual apology if this has already been covered or is in the wrong section.

I hope someone can give some clear advice for my wife?

 

Just to save time and before we go any further everything I’m about to say has been said to my wife's senior staff member and managers. Their answer is that it’s your job and if I don’t like it then leave.

 

My question is; what hours are legal to work before and after a sleepover, i.e. back to back?

 

She works in a care home and at least once per week she works 3pm x 10pm then stays overnight to do a sleepover and starts her next shift at 7am x 3pm so this is a total of 24 hours.

 

To complicate things, until recently she was only expected to get out of bed and help in an emergency, i.e. resuscitation or as an escort to the hospital if one of the residents became ill.

Since the law changed entitling her to be paid minimum wage for a sleepover her boss now expects her to get up and help as a matter of course because she's getting full pay instead of the £30 she did previously.

 

There are 6 residents and from 10pm there are only two staff plus my wife who is on sleepover.

One of the residents needs 1 to 1 care and so this leaves the other staff member to look after the other 5 residents.

My wife often helps until midnight and then gets to bed about 12.30am. At 2am the 2nd staff member wakes her up to help her attend the 5 residents needs mainly because it is policy/law to have 2 people in attendance when handling them.

She will get back to bed at about 5am and then be back on shift at 7am until 3pm with barely any sleep.

Her job entails handing out drugs for which she is paranoid about making mistakes but she is also absolutely shattered during and after work.

 

Senior Management have not officially told her, (verbally or in writing), that she is expected to work during her sleep/rest period but her senior staff member relayed a message from "a manager" that she must.

 

Management have installed installed sensors on the sleepover room and the residents rooms.

1. To prove that the residents are receiving regular checks and that my wife is leaving her room to help out. It lets them record when she left and returned to her room.

 

So in a nutshell she works 3x10pm

Does a sleepover 10pmx7am but is expected to get out of bed and work for none emergency reasons.

Works another shift 7amx3pm

 

Is this legal?

 

Thanks for your help, Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

the WTD limits the number of hours that can be worked in any period, be it 24 hrs or a week. Now she can agree to be exempted from the WTD as far as the maximum number of hours goes but no employer may force their employees to do this so how log has seh worked for them? That may determine what they decide to do when told that she is going to stick with the law thank you very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your wife could raise a concern And if it gets serious, she could raise a grievance

 

 

She should state that she is not observing enough breaks because she has to assist the other worker She is protected if she asserts a statutory rights

Edited by honeybee13
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is very specific case law in relation to sleepovers in carers and so on.

 

The main question is what does she intend to do about it i.e. will she resign/take them to Tribunal?

 

Thanks for the reply Jas.

We are trying to get all the facts before she can decide which way to go. She actually likes her job so doesn't want to resign or jump out of the frying pan.....

Depending on facts and law then she will go through the proper channels and present her case with facts and law to the

Management. If they then refuse to adhere to any relevant laws then move onto a tribunal but she can't jump the gun.

You have hit the right point though in your answer about specific case law in relation to sleepovers. This is why we are on this forum to ask for anyone's personal experience.

Do you know of a specific case in law of her exact predicament because all I can find is related to minimum wage and not about her being expected to work during her sleepovers in between back to back shifts? I can't find one. Probably the nearest and best thing is WTD which is only clear up to a point.

It states she should have 11 hours rest between shifts, but, like lorry drivers, it may possibly allow that to be reduced X amount of times per week.

Realistically her next port of call is Citizens Advice before moving on but resignation won't solve anything, they'll be delighted to just fill the gap with another body with whom they may sack without reason within 2 years. At the moment she has the security of being there for more than 2 years and to reiterate she actually likes her job. Pointless cutting off her nose to spite her face.

Thanks for your time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dondanda.

This sound like a great suggestion, thank you.

She said she will do this officially in writing and hope for a reply. I I said earlier, she has asked them but only verbally so they tend to fob her off.

You are giving her ideas now and making it more clear.

If it's in writing then it's recorded.

At least then she has come back if they still fob her off.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jas,

Thanks so much for that.

I've had a a speed read as I'm in the Canaries and it's lashing down haha so time to spare.

I think it pretty much covers minimum wage.

There's no problem at all here. Jo gets paid minimum wage for every hour that she is at work be it a normal working shift or in bed during a sleep in.

I'm specifically trying to get to my wife working a 7hr shift and then a 9 hr sleep in and then straight onto an 8hr shift.

I.e. 24hrs continuous.

She has very recently been told that she will be woken to carry out run of the mill duties during the night. These are none emergency as is what was understood since she started 8 years ago.

They must have two people to handle residents.

One staff member is now on 1 to 1 care so rarely available which just leaves the other to do a two man job and Jo.

Sorry if this not too clear.

There used to be 2 staff to cover all and a sleep in person for emergencies, i.e. if someone was taken to hospital etc then she was rightly woken.

Now she is a cp credit as a matter of course to get up at 2am and help out because the other staff member is virtually out of the equation.

Does this make sense.

To reiterate, this is not about pay. She gets minimum wage regardless. That's not an issue. It looks more to me now about WTD.

Thanks so much for your input.

 

P.s. if she did 7hrs and then a sleep in then went home it would not be so bad but then she has to do a day shift after very little sleep. 24 hrs on the belt.

She is the expected to hand out drugs and drive the residents to appointments.

She's paranoid of making mistakes especially with the drugs.

Edited by AndyTh
Link to post
Share on other sites

Then this

 

The meaning of compensatory rest can be further analysed in the context of the different types of rest that may be lost and that accordingly give rise to an entitlement to compensatory rest:

 

Weekly rest. A worker is entitled to 24 hours' rest during each seven-day period or 48 hours' rest during each 14-day period, in addition to the daily rest entitlement (regulation 11). If a worker is denied the chance to take a day's rest then the appropriate compensatory rest will presumably be another day's rest in addition to the weekly entitlement.

 

Daily rest. A worker who does not receive an uninterrupted 11-hour rest period on a particular day (regulation 10(1)) will be entitled to a rest period the following day equal to the statutory entitlement (11 hours) plus the time lost on the previous day. For example, if on Monday a manager is called out for 30 minutes part way through an 11-hour rest period then on Tuesday the employer must allow the manager 30 minutes' compensatory rest in addition to the 11-hour rest period (subject to Jaeger; see Does compensatory rest need to be given immediately?). In practice, this might be meaningless insofar as the manager is likely each day to have at least 12 hours' rest

Link to post
Share on other sites

And from your 1st post it would appear that your wife is not being given sufficient periods of rest, which then brings it back to the fundamental question as to what action she would seek to take about it.

Edited by Andyorch
editing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...