Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard & Lloyd’s Credit Card PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1954 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I hope someone can help/give advice.

 

I had Lloyd’s Visa & MasterCard from 1993 & Barclaycard MasterCard & Visa from 1995.

 

I filled in an online request for information for the Barclaycards & received a letter in the post stating that I had ppi on Visa card 30/01/95 - 20/10/98 & on MasterCard 27/07/95 - 24/05/04 Then received an email link to secure message portal to download the information I’d requested.

 

All that amounts to is 3 copy statements from 2007 with zero balance & dreadful photocopies of original postal applications where the box saying I wanted ppi is ticked. I certainly don’t remember ticking it.

 

Did an SAR for Lloyd’s...received a pile of statements oldest being from 2000 & showing no itemised ppi

there is however a terrible quality photocopy of my original application from 1993 again with the ppi box supposedly ticked.

 

I’m new to all this...is there any point me attempting to claim back ppi ?

I certainly never received any ppi terms & conditions or anything & wouldn’t have been able to claim on it....didn’t even know I had it.

Any advice welcomed.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely, it is worth pursuing.

 

You should begin by sending them each an SAR. When you get the SAR look carefully at what you get and also at what might be missing. They have 30 days to respond. It is free of charge. Come here when you get the disclosure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The VERY limited information I received from Lloyds was in response to an SAR posted recorded delivery on 9th September.

Will try another one & possibly report to The Data Commissioner as they appear to have decided what they want to send me rather than send all relevant information they hold.

 

Will SAR Barclaycard

 

RBS haven’t even acknowledged SAR sent to them recorded delivery 9th September !

 

Thanks for your input

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you should complain immediately the information Commissioner about any delays. The bank seem to be establishing a culture of delay and they seem to be putting two fingers up to the GDPR rules.

 

If you wanted to start an action against RBS and we would help you. We've just had a very interesting result against Lloyds although I'm unable to give you the full details because they are confidential. However, I can pretty well guarantee you that once they have exceeded their deadline, if you want to bring an action then you wouldn't be disappointed.

 

Begin by making a complaint to the ICO immediately. It's free. You will get a message from the ICO saying that it appears that they may not have complied with the GDPR regulations. This is enough to face a legal action. You will get some compensation and it will be fun.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, the ICO suggested I try & resolve with the banks before making a complaint to them !

 

I have written to Lloyd’s & Barclays again re. their non-compliance stating that if they don’t comply in full with my request I will raise a formal complaint with ICO.

 

RBS finally responded... a tatty brown, thin, recycled envelope ripped open with statements spilling out !

 

Hand scrawled address...No covering letter & ignored request for loan agreements that may have PPI..

 

.took photos of the package before I opened it...

going straight to the ICO about them...

disgusting

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...