Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Work disciplinary.....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1994 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here's the deal...

 

 

I made a mistake, not denying it at all. First actual mistake i've made at this employer.

 

 

It turns out this same mistake has been happening for years, I believe the root cause is their database/system, which takes no action to mitigate against such mistakes and actually in this particular case encourages mistakes.

 

 

 

The root cause is defined as the non-human element that would have absolutely prevented the error if removed from the equation. So for example, if you were told to cross a narrow foot bridge and fell off because there was no hand rail, where does the fault lie?? hmmm?

 

 

What's annoying is that there is no willingness to fix the problem, what's more annoying is that it's happened so many times with different people that you have to wonder why the bloody the problem (which it turns out has been complained about multiple times) has never been identified. As a former quality engineer I find this extremely frustrating.......

 

 

 

The company has a pretty toxic blame culture, it's always "who" not "how" or "why", people try to cover up mistakes and push responsibility down onto someone else, every now and again someone gets sacrificed to the blame gods so that a certain person can appear as though they are doing their job.

Some people even go so far as to establish an email chain before doing anything they're asked to do by this person, in the misguided belief that this protects them from blame, when in fact they're not the only people with access to said emails.

 

 

 

My mistake was basically in forgetting a screw up had occurred when I got back into work on Monday, having had barely any sleep due to a constantly screaming 3 week old baby which has had to be put onto medication for severe reflux (i hate mentioning that, but it's relevant to explaining my tiredness).

 

 

Should well designed, robust systems and processes fall over as soon as someone comes into work sick or tired? I think not.

 

So here we are, facing a disciplinary for a minor mistake (which is being trumped up into something bigger), knowing full well that had they investigated previous mistakes properly and implemented corrective actions, it wouldn't have happened at all.

 

 

The primary "complaint" is not the cost of the mistake, but the "personal embarrassment" caused, which i'm finding it very hard to not say "well suck it up snowflake, fix your sh*t and stop blaming people who fall into the cracks".

Link to post
Share on other sites

So to mistake proof your own system should you not have some way of leaving yourself reminder notes ?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that's not a fix, it's a sticking plaster.

 

 

I'm not kidding myself, I understand it's hard for most people to see this when they haven't work my sort of background, but systems should be robust enough to mitigate against mistakes happening, to the point where the only way to screw up is deliberately.

 

 

When the same problem occurs again and again (even going back before I joined), you have to wonder why there is a reluctance to even consider fixing it.

 

 

In both the automotive manufacturing sector and the defence sector, if you went back to a customer with "oh we found the person and punished them", they'd tear you a new ********, starting with "ok, how do you plan on making sure nobody does this again?" and your response is "post-it notes", you'd lose a million £ contract.

Edited by Strider440
Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right, I have experienced the same problem.

Unfortunately bosses are not interested in fixing these sort of issues even when life is at risk.

It's usually because of money but also because if they keep things open to accidental mistakes, they can get rid of people more easily.

Sad but unless there's a government organization supervising and taking in whisleblowers' complaint, there's nothing you can do rather than highlight the problem in your disciplinary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the deal...

 

 

I made a mistake, not denying it at all. First actual mistake i've made at this employer.

 

 

It turns out this same mistake has been happening for years, I believe the root cause is their database/system, which takes no action to mitigate against such mistakes and actually in this particular case encourages mistakes.

 

 

 

The root cause is defined as the non-human element that would have absolutely prevented the error if removed from the equation. So for example, if you were told to cross a narrow foot bridge and fell off because there was no hand rail, where does the fault lie?? hmmm?

 

 

What's annoying is that there is no willingness to fix the problem, what's more annoying is that it's happened so many times with different people that you have to wonder why the bloody the problem (which it turns out has been complained about multiple times) has never been identified. As a former quality engineer I find this extremely frustrating.......

 

 

 

The company has a pretty toxic blame culture, it's always "who" not "how" or "why", people try to cover up mistakes and push responsibility down onto someone else, every now and again someone gets sacrificed to the blame gods so that a certain person can appear as though they are doing their job.

Some people even go so far as to establish an email chain before doing anything they're asked to do by this person, in the misguided belief that this protects them from blame, when in fact they're not the only people with access to said emails.

 

 

 

My mistake was basically in forgetting a screw up had occurred when I got back into work on Monday, having had barely any sleep due to a constantly screaming 3 week old baby which has had to be put onto medication for severe reflux (i hate mentioning that, but it's relevant to explaining my tiredness).

 

 

Should well designed, robust systems and processes fall over as soon as someone comes into work sick or tired? I think not.

 

So here we are, facing a disciplinary for a minor mistake (which is being trumped up into something bigger), knowing full well that had they investigated previous mistakes properly and implemented corrective actions, it wouldn't have happened at all.

 

 

The primary "complaint" is not the cost of the mistake, but the "personal embarrassment" caused, which i'm finding it very hard to not say "well suck it up snowflake, fix your sh*t and stop blaming people who fall into the cracks".

 

I really don't understand this post

You seem to be moaning and not specifying the issue

Are you admitting you made a mistake and stating the mitigating factor?

or

Are you stating that the system wasn't robust enough to pick up your mistake?

These two are different approaches and the response you get depends on your company and the culture that prevails there

Your approach really matters

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't understand this post

You seem to be moaning and not specifying the issue

Are you admitting you made a mistake and stating the mitigating factor?

or

Are you stating that the system wasn't robust enough to pick up your mistake?

These two are different approaches and the response you get depends on your company and the culture that prevails there

Your approach really matters

 

 

It was more of an open ended post, to get responses on the general situation.

 

 

There are personal mitigating factors (at that time), such as recent involvement in a serious car accident and lack of sleep due to a newborn baby (2 weeks old at the time), which they know about and makes what they're doing even more of a [removed] shot below the belt.

 

 

The system failures which I raised, those that preceded the mistake, are issues that (it turns out) many people knew about but have been too worried to mentioned for sake of retribution.

 

I believe that a robust "system" should easily mitigate against people being sick (especially considering their draconian sick pay policy), people being tired and momentary lapses of concentration.

 

 

I don't think that this is merely about a mistake, I think it's more of a "shut up and stop rocking the boat", because of the issues I raised.

Edited by honeybee13
Offensive word removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

It was more of an open ended post, to get responses on the general situation.

 

 

There are personal mitigating factors (at that time), such as recent involvement in a serious car accident and lack of sleep due to a newborn baby (2 weeks old at the time), which they know about and makes what they're doing even more of a c*ntish shot below the belt.

 

 

The system failures which I raised, those that preceded the mistake, are issues that (it turns out) many people knew about but have been too worried to mentioned for sake of retribution.

 

I believe that a robust "system" should easily mitigate against people being sick (especially considering their draconian sick pay policy), people being tired and momentary lapses of concentration.

 

 

I don't think that this is merely about a mistake, I think it's more of a "shut up and stop rocking the boat", because of the issues I raised.

 

This is still little more than a serious whinge, with sexist profanities now thrown in. What you believe is irrelevant. As are your personal circumstances outside work. That's none of the employers concern. Their concern is that you do your job, you haven't, and actually, you are on something of a hiding to nothing claiming that the mistake was made when you actually know about the problem (whatever it is).

 

This is clearly not the workplace for you. You don't like the employer, you don't like your job, you don't like the terms, and you don't seem to have a good word to say about it. Which is fair enough. So why are you still working there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is still little more than a serious whinge, with sexist profanities now thrown in. What you believe is irrelevant. As are your personal circumstances outside work. That's none of the employers concern. Their concern is that you do your job, you haven't, and actually, you are on something of a hiding to nothing claiming that the mistake was made when you actually know about the problem (whatever it is).

 

This is clearly not the workplace for you. You don't like the employer, you don't like your job, you don't like the terms, and you don't seem to have a good word to say about it. Which is fair enough. So why are you still working there?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually your wrong, we're people, not machines, to err is human and any business that does not account for possible mistakes, nay actually encourages mistakes, is utterly foolish.

 

 

And sexist what? Are you feeling ok? would you like a safe space?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

How long have you been employed with your present employer?

 

Have you had any previous warning on record?

 

Exactly what are you up on Disciplinary for?

 

I have to say from your thread if this is going to be your approach to this disciplinary hearing with your employer I can only see it going one way and not in your favour.

 

Outside work hours as mentioned (car accident, 3 week old baby) is nothing to do with the employer.

 

Bringing others in the workplace knew about this issue directly means you were fully aware of this issue.

 

You need to step back and concentrate on exactly what they are disciplining you on and not what others may or may not have done/said, yes you are probably upset about this (to put it politely) but your approach on this thread will get you nowhere in the disciplinary.

 

Do you have a copy of their Disciplinary Policy? (have you read it fully and have they followed there own policy)

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And sexist what? Are you feeling ok? would you like a safe space?

 

 

 

 

That'd be your use of the C word. It's entirely valid to be offended by it, and it is a gendered insult.

 

 

Are you always this aggressive at work? Previous posts suggest so but I can't work out if that's you in the real world or just for here. You've had disciplinaries and been let go because "it's not working out" at previous employers?

 

 

 

But many employers will use smaller mistakes to get rid of someone with behavioual issues, because it's just easier.

 

 

 

I get that you are tired. I get that the employer does not match your idea of perfection. However a dose of "I'm sorry", however hard to swallow, woold go a long way towards smoothing word relationships, if that is what you want to do. It's a tough employment market out there if you're not in a few specialist IT areas; and you have a young kid - not the best time to be job hunting?

 

 

Don't get obessed over what you feel is right - right is subjective. Work out what you want the end state to be, and act accordingly.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually your wrong, we're people, not machines, to err is human and any business that does not account for possible mistakes, nay actually encourages mistakes, is utterly foolish.

 

 

And sexist what? Are you feeling ok? would you like a safe space?

 

It is entirely your opinion and nothing more as to how a business that you do not own should conduct themselves. When you own the business, you may run it as you wish. They are currently running it at they wish, and will continue to do so. Any employee who doesn't realise that is utterly foolish.

 

If you don't know the answer to that you may wish to consider the extent to which your own behavior contributes towards your employers view of your conduct. You clearly aren't very self aware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the thread does not contain enough information about this issue, then it is difficult to comment.

 

If there is any system issue, then collect any useful information that is available and take this to any disciplinary meeting.

 

I presume any disciplinary would relate to performance and therefore before any such disciplinary meeting, it would be up to the employers to provide notice of what the exact performance issue was, that needed to be addreessed. This would enable the employee to gather any information they needed, so that any discussion on performance could be fairly held.

 

In regard to performance disciplinaries, perhaps it would be useful to understand what is required of employers legally and what is just good practice ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you talk of a blame culture, it is clearly endemic. You talk about a systme failure without saying what it was and what you are accused of that warrants disciplinary action. You are very aggressive to people who offer help and if you allowed them to you wold find they are experts in this field.

Be a little more forthcoming and you will get advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...