Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Caught using father's freedom pass - **SETTLED OOC**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1858 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everybody. Can I just ask, how long does it usually take to hear a response from TFL in regards to my appeal? Just a bit curious as I am not sure how long it’ll take. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

it can take weeks even months.

however the longer you don't get a reply

the greater chance they are investigating things specific to your case rather than applying a 'default' reply.

 

this normally indicates they are looking at their losses and tabulating their losses in terms of fares not paid.

 

if they are doing that , then why do it if they are not considering an OOC settlement.

 

your initial posts indicated this was a couple of times a weeks for a few months or so.....

 

in all probability this will costs you dearly in an OOC settlement...possibly like this thread..

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?456947-TFL-misuse-Freedom-Pass-more-than-once-**-SETTLED-BEFORE-COURT-**

 

but it was a win...a worthy read.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great thread you read and that fine is quite hefty! I only used it once a week for about a month or two so in total that’s about 10 times at most. Whatever the fee is, I will be happy to pay it as it will be a short term loss but beneficial in the long term.

 

Thanks for the reply dx. Will get back to you all not so soon hopefully haha

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

its you job in the downtime to find and read these things too...cag is self help as well.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

anything happened?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven’t heard back yet from them. Will let you know as soon as I do for either extra advice or a massive thank you! Hopefully it all goes wel, I’ve been really depressed past month or so because I’m worried of the outcome but I hope they will see my sincerity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I’ve received the letter from the courts and they intend to prosecute me for £338+£5.90 for the fares avoided.

The court date is towards the end of March.

 

Please can I get some advice as they have given me to either

plead guilty and not attend,

plead guilty and attend

or not plead guilty.

 

What do I choose?

What do I do now?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

as they say, plead guilty by post, plead guilty but turn up to offer mitigation and hope you get a reduction of the costs they are claiming or turn up and plead not guilty.

 

If you do the letter you will find it is what is called an absolute offence so you will most likely be found guilty and get clobbered for the amount demanded and some more unless there is something else anyone can point you towards as far as a defence goes.

 

Now if you are really broke then the guilty plea in person with a request for time to pay would seem prudent,

you then pay a fiver a week or whatever the court decids you can afford and you might get their costs whittled down a bit by pointing out you tried to settle once you realised you were in the wrong and so the investigation and prosecution costs could have been avoided.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

I understand that side but my question was not clear enough.

 

My question is

how do I try and negotiate an OOC settlement.

 

I don’t want to end up having to take this to court because I know I will lose the case and end up with a criminal record.

I am trying to avoid a criminal record and trying to see if anybody can guide me on what to do to try speak to TFL and settle it outside of court.

 

I don’t want a criminal record and I honestly can’t believe it’s lead to this.

I wish I knew all of this before any of this even happened.

My future prospers are all on the line because of this stupid mistake which really annoys me.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

The way to try and avoid a court case is to continue to speak to the person at TfL handling your case, as I've probably said before. Other threads here have ended with OOC settlements because the OP talked to the case handler and pleading your case.

 

There's also the possibility of going along to the court on the day with cash in your hand and speaking to the prosecutor.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

Let’s say that I don’t get an OOC settlement,

how long will I need to serve the criminal record for?

Is it for 1 year or more?

 

Also, does anybody have the number that I can call TFL with as the letter mainly had the courts papers.

Thanks for all your help it’s greatly appreciated.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

as HB and EB says

PESTER THEM.

you know what it costs now.

make yourself a nuisance of the TFL phone line

ask to speak to your case number handler.

 

 

its worthy to note

and I know there was one report of them now not being allowed to accept OOC settlements

but there were two elsewhere on Tuesday, so I think that was just one case handler being obstructive.

 

ring plead your case

if that doesn't work

wait a day or so and try gain.

 

£400 is pittance to them threy should accept OOC at a monthly rate with no record.

 

you also stand a very good chance on the day too, find the cae handler, plead with tem you don't want a crimal record, offer full settlement there and then.

 

there have also been cases whereby once in court, with a guilty plea in person, a criminal record has nor been made.

 

IMHO you stand a very good chance.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your replies.

 

DX, you’ve given me a lot more hope and have made me feel a lot better. It’s time for me to put in as much effort as I can to fix this issue and try get an OOC settlement. I’ll keep everybody up to date throughout the whole process. Thanks again masixvely to everybody.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

Let’s say that I don’t get an OOC settlement,

how long will I need to serve the criminal record for?

Is it for 1 year or more?

 

1 year for a fine, and then the provisions of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (RoOA) kick in, and in the majority of circumstances you don't have to reveal the conviction.

 

For jobs / circumstances where the Rehabilitation of Offenders legislation doesn't apply: rather than 1 year, it is 'never' - you must always disclose it.

So, jobs where an eDBS is required (and the application details will note it is 'exempt' from the provision of the RoOA), such as most of the jobs with patient contact in the health services, or the criminal justice system, as well as for visa applications (for example, the US government don't recognise the RoOA for the purposes of immigration / visa waiver).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply bazzas.

 

I’ve been trying to call TFL’s customer service line at 03432221234 but they are telling me to write to the address of my case handler as there is no phone line I can get through to them?

 

Does anybody know a number that I can call or can direct me of what to do next? I will send a letter if need be but I would rather speak to the case handler and show my remorse than send another letter which may take weeks to get back to me.

 

Any help here would be massively appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn’t an email either. Very surprising that there’s only the case handler’s name and the address. Does that mean my only choice is to send a letter? I would much prefer any number I can try if anybody knows of one or another way.

 

Thanks for the reply HB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody.

 

Just spoke to someone at the IAP office over the phone. He opened up my case and I heard him take notes of everything I said. I explained to him how it would effect me and my family (mitigating circumstances) etc... he informed me that decisions aren’t made over the phone. I have to email/send a letter to them and they re-review it again and see if it’s in the public’s interest not to continue to this into court.

 

I am going to write a letter and email to them and keep you all updated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep it very brief and don't waffle

have you looked at our examples here already.

 

info upon the details of email/phone will help others...IAP?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...