Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CPM - UK/gladstones PCN - one photo by shop assistant - now threats of court - should i reply??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1849 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, please people need your help. Received a letter from Gladstone solicitors.

It refers to a parking notice.

They said I owe £160 to DRP.

 

To date I have ignored their letters but this is the first one from Gladstone.

It mentions the case of Beavis

It asked me to make full payment to DRP, if I dont in 14 days, I should keep them updated with address change so I can defend court proceedings.

 

There have only supplied one photo which was taken from the shop assistant of the rear of the vehicle.

No times or anything.

The signs were very unclear and small.

 

Do I pay?

do I respond to Gladstone or do I just wait for the summons and defend in court?

what are my prospects of success.

 

Your assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(3-Viewing)-nbsp

 

 

You dont pay no, and you certainly dont ignore them.

 

 

 

Fill in the above link.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your prompt response.

 

I called the petrol station and told them exactly that. However, she just said 'well its out of our hands now and I can't do nothing about it, you will need to contact them directly'.

 

Should I call / write to Gladstone, if so, what should I say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great honeybee. Answers below:

 

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] - this was done by a handheld camera

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement - 06/06/18

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] - 12/06/18

 

3 Date received - 18/06/18

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] Yes - last para

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? just one picture of the rear of vehicle

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal] - No

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up n?A

7 Who is the parking company? CPM - UK CAR PARK MANAGEMENT LTD

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] - 118 - 120 Wednesbury Road - petrol station

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. - only says operating in accordance to independent parking committees code of practice

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

 

Received initial letter from CPM

- saying pay £60 within 14 days or it will go to £100.

 

 

Then received a reminder and

now received a letter from Gladstones to say contact Debt recovery plus limited.

If I dont pay within 14 days, keep their client and Agents DRP updated with address.

 

Also, question 8 - just found it at the back of the letter - it is IAS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey that's great.

 

can I just be sure. you've not moved and gladdy's have the correct address?

 

if so ignore now till/if you get a letter of claim from them.

 

who's the petrol station owners? ESSO

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread title updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if get a chance photos of all the signs and their position would be good.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, once again thank you for your response.

 

I have attached the photo of exactly the photo on the day.

 

Next to my silver car, you will see a yellow bin, just above that towards the right is the sign.

 

I have lived round here all my life and I have never noticed it, it is barely visible, unless you start specifically looking for it.

 

Please find attached.

Car position.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread tidied

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bit pixalated?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

use the JPG file you uploaded before

blot out the reg

 

convert to PDF and upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Signage is definitley not compliant. That alone will kill a claim.

 

And Gladys saying you owe a dca for a spurious speculative invoice to a totally different company? They're not very smart are they.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth an acidic letter to Gladdy's pointing out that they have no chance in court, sure ericsbrother will come up with a suitable response for the worlds worse solicitors.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is not a real threat of court action, it is a letter trying to coerce you into paying something you dont owe.

 

 

Now here is a question that hasnt been tested in court yet- what authority under the GDPRlink3.gif does the shop assistant ahve to pass on your personal datalink3.gif to UKCPM? is that person or business registered with the ICOlink3.gif to take such pictures for that purpose? I bet I know the answer and that menas UKCPM will have trouble explaining their role in this breach plus the one where they have lied to the DVLA to obtain your keeper details.

 

 

 

Problem is no-one ever gets done for such behaviour, at best someone sues them on rare occasions where the ICO should fine them say £500 per breach and assume that all similar incidents are equally unlawful and just hit them with a penalty that fits in with the number of events adn let them prove to the contrary.

 

 

also do you have proof that the NTK was delivered on the 18th as that is 1 day too late for a keeper liability to be created but as they arent above telling lies about the issue date just to try and get within the law it woudl be worth asking the DVLA who has accessed your data, when and for what stated purpose. the DVLA then send out a stock response about the law allowing peopel to ask so you may have to demand the information twice.

 

 

Gladstones are a firm of solicitors that own the IPC and have their registered office on a golf course somewhere They are acting as a rentathreat the same as DR+ but do so because they want to look big in front of their IPC members as they are actually quite bad at their day job.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have today been back to the petrol station to take more photos, which are attached. I have attached three photos in total. The first photo is opposite to where i parked, clearly this is not visible when you drive in. The second picture is the same but a little bit clearer. And the last pic is where i parked. I was in the position of the bigger car on the right. As you will probably notice somebody has taken the sign down. It was beneath the black sign.

More photos.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

how are we supposed to read the signs from those pictures? the adsnece of the sign is helpful though but PLEASE can you read other threads carefully so you know what we expect to enable us to help you. We wnat you to be able to tell these greedy gits that you are well aware of their behaviour and have the evidnec thatyou know their

 

 

 

demands have no merit whatsoever so knowing what they are saying you were offered is importnat. The positioning of the signage means they are already on to a loser but another nail will keep the coffin lid on.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras, typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have taken another picture of the sign but had to go really close to get the small writing actually says. For the avoidance of doubt, it says the following:

 

'private property.... Authorised vehicles only... a valid permit must be clearly displayedin windscreen at all times. No parking outside the designated are / parking bay. If unsure please seek advice from CPM or refrain from parking. By entering and remaining on this land you agree to abide by all the terms and conditions. Breach of ANy term or condition will result in the driver being liable for it. Parking charge of £100. Parking charges to be paid within 28 days card payment are subject to 1.50 processing fee additional parking charges apply for each 24 hour period, all part thereof that the vehicle remains in breach or if it returns any time. Terms and conditions apply 24 hr a day, all year round. Where a parking charge becomes due an application may be made to the DVLA for the keepers details. Non payment will result in additional charges which will be added to the value of the charge and for which the driver will be liable on an indemnity basis. Automatic number plate recognition may be in use. Images maybe captured and retained for enforcement purposes. We are not liable for any loss or damage howsoever caused to any person or property whilst on this site. Save under any statutory exceptions. Manage by UK Carpark management LTD.

 

 

You will not believe me when I tell you the sign which was taken down has just now appeared again. However, the problem is they have a picture of my car when the sign was there.

ACTUAL SIGN PDF.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

this makes it even worse for the parking co as that is not the offer of a contract to park but a forbidding or prohibitive sign. That means any demand is an unlawful penalty.

 

What to do? now you have enough evidence to beat them if they are mad enough to try their luck I would be sending them a letter stating the following.

 

 

"Dear Will and John or Jamie and Helen, when you studied law you would have learnt the difference between a sign that is a unilateral contract and one that is forbidding in nature such as authorised vehicles only. It is a shame that the IPC cant tell the difference and advise its members accordingly but no matter as you are much cleverer than the people who run the IPC so you will of course tell your clients that there was no breach of contract to cause them to demand money because there was no contract offered and thus their demand is without cause.

 

 

 

Any claim will be firmly rersisted and your clients will lose as per usual for a multitude of reasons that a lawyer should already know and the circumstances around this matter may also result in a claim for damages as a result of the breaches of the GDPR"

 

 

 

send as is

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...