Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/Shoos want Payment plan review for old Virgin MBNA card debt **WON**


Peppermint1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1910 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I'm new to this forum and would be grateful for any advice.

 

My mother took out a Virgin credit card back in 2010, she suffered a number serious health issues, lost her job and could not afford the monthly repayment.

 

She continued to make reduced payments, until she was no longer able to afford these either. I carried on paying token amounts on her behalf over the last 5-6 years.

 

The debt was passed on to a number of DCAs but I continued to pay Virgin directly. Recently a letter was sent to my mother titled "change of Agency" from Arrow and one from Shoosmiths requiring a I&E form to be completed for "payment plan review".

 

My mothers health never recovered, to the point where I manage her finances, the only income she receives is ESA/PIP and I top up to pay the bills and rent.

 

If I fill out the form, her basic expenses significantly outweigh her income, so I'm very unsure how to approach this and would be grateful for any advice.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them a CCA request

who says she even OWEs this money.??

 

don't forget a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and has

ZERO legal powers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this was a virgin MBNA credit card debt?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no send arrows a cca request

put them to strict proof they hold the legal paperwork to enforce the debt

 

and any other debts you/her are blindly paying to DCA's

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

retitlted and moved to the MBNA forum.

 

the debt has now been sold to a debt buyer DCA [arrows]

 

shoos are their pet solicitor.

 

just to check things 100%

the letter was not entitled letter of claim

was it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

No, the letter is titled “Payment Plan Review - Financial Assessment”

 

It also says that “ it is important that we hear from you within the next 7 days. In the absence of a response our client reserves the right to commence legal action.”

 

“The following payment options are available to you

 

1. Repayment of balance by an affordable payment plan

2. Consideration will be given to a discounted settlement figure”

 

Do solicitors have to deal with vulnerable individuals any differently?

Link to post
Share on other sites

in a way yes they do..

...but they don't care ..just want free money ..

 

but lets make them get their ducks inline first eh?

 

CCA request time!!

 

wont hurt to also send MBNA an SAR to get everything they hold too.

could be stuff to reclaim like PPI and penalty charges.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the CCA request off and they have to fulfil it to get anything from you. Their timelines are irrelevant. They wont have any paperwork on your debt. No DCA does until you request it. Of course, the DCA's know this and know 90% of people dont, so they get free money for sending out a few automatically generated threat letters that no actual person in the DCA office has seen.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Thanks for all your help everyone.

 

I finally received a letter back from Arrow Global.

 

It says “We are unable to revert to the original creditor to obtain the documents that you requested”

“We acknowledge that, until we are able to provide copies of the documents to you, your account is unenforceable. This does not mean that the account has ceased to exist, if we are provided with the relevant documentation at a future date, we will send copies to you. At that point the account will again become enforceable and we will then require your proposals for repayment. “

 

The debt is old and has fallen off the credit record already but what do I do now? Stop the payments? Propose a settlement?

 

I'd appreciate the forums guidance :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore it now. You should have stopped payments 2 weeks after you sent the CCA.

 

At that point the account will again become enforceable

 

Umm no it wont, if other statutory reasons come into play :) But its just a threat to scare you into paying to make them go away for good.

 

You certainly wont be offering any settlement payment. They do NOT have the legal right to collect any debt on the account because they do not have the paperwork needed. They even clearly state the account is unenforceable. Breath a sigh of relief and forget about it now.

 

Its over. Done with. You won. They lost. Congratulations.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

should have stopped payment the days the 12+2 workings days time limit passed

 

never mind

another DCA cash cow removed from their milking parlour

 

glad cag could help

 

think about a donation because of all the potential money we've now saved you

keep us here to help others like you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...