Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Possible subsidence, about to change insurance - claim now? claim later? don't claim at all?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for some wise advice from those more experienced than I with insurance and subsidence claims.

 

Our house (circa 1890 semi-detached) is on a small slope and had some evidence of small "historical" movements when we bought it 20 years ago. Very little has changed since, and a structural engineer didn't mention subsidence in an inspection 4 years ago. However, it seems the neighbour's house has developed cracks near the party wall in the last few years, and they seem to suspect OUR house is to blame as we are further down the (small) incline. They say they have inspection reports from the last 6 months, but we haven't seen anything yet.

 

To complicate matters slightly, we are changing from our current landlord's insurance policy to a homeowner's policy in a couple weeks, as we will be moving into the house ourselves.

 

We are worried about

1) raising the issue of subsidence on our current landlord's policy, as this might make our new (already agreed and paid for) homeowner's insurance invalid.

2) waiting until we move in to raise the topic, as our new insurance might balk at a subsidence claim if we make it shortly after the policy starts.

3) being stuck in a no-man's zone between the two policies, with neither willing to cover...if indeed there is subsidence.

4)the neighbours will take some sort of legal action and find a structural engineer that will pin all blame on us.

 

Both our policies are with the same company, which will hopefully help.

 

We don't even know if there is subsidence of course, but it does seem possible. Any advice from those who know more about how insurance companies would treat such things would be most appreciated.

 

What is the best course of action?

1) Raise the issue immediately?

2) Raise it later?

3) Do our own inspection first and only then contact the company? (this will likely push us into the new policy period)

 

Thanks in advance for any information or advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no current evidence of subsidence. The cracks could be caused by a number of issues.

 

First thing to do is ask neighbours for the inspection reports, to see what they say about the party wall. Are they structural engineers reports ? If they are just a basic survey, then I doubt any surveyor has stated that there is definitely a subsidence problem. If they are a standard surveyors report suggesting possible subsidence, then obtain a structural engineers report. Because Insurance has a subsidence excess of £1000 plus, you would always pay for such reports anyway.

 

Once you have more information, then you should speak to the current Insurance underwriters. They will probably be able to continue Insurance for a standard homeowners policy and deal with any subsidence claim under any new homeowners policy you arranged with them. If the neigbours had the same Insurance underwriters, then this will make it easier in regard to any work that is required to fix the problem.

 

Don't change Insurance before you find out whether this a subsidence issue or not. You will end up having problems, with new Insurers not accepting any claim and your old Insurers also not helping as the policy was cancelled. Best to resolve whether this is a subs issue or not and retain Insurance with current underwriter in the meantime.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Uncle Bulgaria.

 

It's a bit tricky, as we will be *required* to change insurance when we move into the house in two weeks (currently it's landlord insurance, we'll need homeowner's insurance). We are using the same company, but perhaps should double check the underwriter is also the same.

 

Given that we haven't seen any reports or been officially informed of any subsidence on the neighbour's side, and we have a structural inspection report from 2014 that doesn't mention subsidence on our side, it seems like we're asking for trouble if we raise it now, no?

 

Once we move in, we would of course do a proper inspection of the house, including structural engineer if there's any suspicion of subsidence or other movement, but if we did it now and it discovered a problem, wouldn't that make our new application invalid?

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

There is no current evidence of subsidence. The cracks could be caused by a number of issues.

 

First thing to do is ask neighbours for the inspection reports, to see what they say about the party wall. Are they structural engineers reports ? If they are just a basic survey, then I doubt any surveyor has stated that there is definitely a subsidence problem. If they are a standard surveyors report suggesting possible subsidence, then obtain a structural engineers report. Because Insurance has a subsidence excess of £1000 plus, you would always pay for such reports anyway.

 

Once you have more information, then you should speak to the current Insurance underwriters. They will probably be able to continue Insurance for a standard homeowners policy and deal with any subsidence claim under any new homeowners policy you arranged with them. If the neigbours had the same Insurance underwriters, then this will make it easier in regard to any work that is required to fix the problem.

 

Don't change Insurance before you find out whether this a subsidence issue or not. You will end up having problems, with new Insurers not accepting any claim and your old Insurers also not helping as the policy was cancelled. Best to resolve whether this is a subs issue or not and retain Insurance with current underwriter in the meantime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Needs to be the same underwriter and not just the same broker. This is about continuity of Insurance cover, with the same underwriters, so you can claim for any subsidence issue, if one exists.

 

Most landlord underwriters, will also underwrite homeowners policies. Find out the underwriter and ask them.

 

Ok lets just imagine that the cracks become a major issue, after you have moved into the house, because the neighbour is on a mission. The Insurers send out a loss assessor and the neighbour tells them you knew about the issue. You might think this is one persons word against another persons. But are you willing to take the risk ? Insurers will appoint a company if they have any concerns to question you very closely. It will be very difficult, not to admit that you had some prior knowledge. If you have changed underwriter, you face a nightmare situation. Even with the same underwriter, they might say you failed to advise them when you were first aware. But then you can argue about the 2014 report and no evidence of any subsidence issue.

 

My advice having seen claimants come a cropper in this situation, is to approach it safety first.

 

Priority

 

1) retain buildings cover with the same underwriter so you have continuity of cover.

 

2) speak to the neighbours about the reports and current condition of the party wall they spoke about.

 

3) Depending on what you find out, obtain a structural engineers report.

 

 

You really have to think about the worst case possible, where major underpinning works are required, meaning you need to also claim for alternative accommodation costs. Such claims can run into many tens of thousands. Ok, it might not be as bad as this, but this is the largest possible risk you could face.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...