Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Possible subsidence, about to change insurance - claim now? claim later? don't claim at all?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2025 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for some wise advice from those more experienced than I with insurance and subsidence claims.

 

Our house (circa 1890 semi-detached) is on a small slope and had some evidence of small "historical" movements when we bought it 20 years ago. Very little has changed since, and a structural engineer didn't mention subsidence in an inspection 4 years ago. However, it seems the neighbour's house has developed cracks near the party wall in the last few years, and they seem to suspect OUR house is to blame as we are further down the (small) incline. They say they have inspection reports from the last 6 months, but we haven't seen anything yet.

 

To complicate matters slightly, we are changing from our current landlord's insurance policy to a homeowner's policy in a couple weeks, as we will be moving into the house ourselves.

 

We are worried about

1) raising the issue of subsidence on our current landlord's policy, as this might make our new (already agreed and paid for) homeowner's insurance invalid.

2) waiting until we move in to raise the topic, as our new insurance might balk at a subsidence claim if we make it shortly after the policy starts.

3) being stuck in a no-man's zone between the two policies, with neither willing to cover...if indeed there is subsidence.

4)the neighbours will take some sort of legal action and find a structural engineer that will pin all blame on us.

 

Both our policies are with the same company, which will hopefully help.

 

We don't even know if there is subsidence of course, but it does seem possible. Any advice from those who know more about how insurance companies would treat such things would be most appreciated.

 

What is the best course of action?

1) Raise the issue immediately?

2) Raise it later?

3) Do our own inspection first and only then contact the company? (this will likely push us into the new policy period)

 

Thanks in advance for any information or advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no current evidence of subsidence. The cracks could be caused by a number of issues.

 

First thing to do is ask neighbours for the inspection reports, to see what they say about the party wall. Are they structural engineers reports ? If they are just a basic survey, then I doubt any surveyor has stated that there is definitely a subsidence problem. If they are a standard surveyors report suggesting possible subsidence, then obtain a structural engineers report. Because Insurance has a subsidence excess of £1000 plus, you would always pay for such reports anyway.

 

Once you have more information, then you should speak to the current Insurance underwriters. They will probably be able to continue Insurance for a standard homeowners policy and deal with any subsidence claim under any new homeowners policy you arranged with them. If the neigbours had the same Insurance underwriters, then this will make it easier in regard to any work that is required to fix the problem.

 

Don't change Insurance before you find out whether this a subsidence issue or not. You will end up having problems, with new Insurers not accepting any claim and your old Insurers also not helping as the policy was cancelled. Best to resolve whether this is a subs issue or not and retain Insurance with current underwriter in the meantime.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Uncle Bulgaria.

 

It's a bit tricky, as we will be *required* to change insurance when we move into the house in two weeks (currently it's landlord insurance, we'll need homeowner's insurance). We are using the same company, but perhaps should double check the underwriter is also the same.

 

Given that we haven't seen any reports or been officially informed of any subsidence on the neighbour's side, and we have a structural inspection report from 2014 that doesn't mention subsidence on our side, it seems like we're asking for trouble if we raise it now, no?

 

Once we move in, we would of course do a proper inspection of the house, including structural engineer if there's any suspicion of subsidence or other movement, but if we did it now and it discovered a problem, wouldn't that make our new application invalid?

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

There is no current evidence of subsidence. The cracks could be caused by a number of issues.

 

First thing to do is ask neighbours for the inspection reports, to see what they say about the party wall. Are they structural engineers reports ? If they are just a basic survey, then I doubt any surveyor has stated that there is definitely a subsidence problem. If they are a standard surveyors report suggesting possible subsidence, then obtain a structural engineers report. Because Insurance has a subsidence excess of £1000 plus, you would always pay for such reports anyway.

 

Once you have more information, then you should speak to the current Insurance underwriters. They will probably be able to continue Insurance for a standard homeowners policy and deal with any subsidence claim under any new homeowners policy you arranged with them. If the neigbours had the same Insurance underwriters, then this will make it easier in regard to any work that is required to fix the problem.

 

Don't change Insurance before you find out whether this a subsidence issue or not. You will end up having problems, with new Insurers not accepting any claim and your old Insurers also not helping as the policy was cancelled. Best to resolve whether this is a subs issue or not and retain Insurance with current underwriter in the meantime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Needs to be the same underwriter and not just the same broker. This is about continuity of Insurance cover, with the same underwriters, so you can claim for any subsidence issue, if one exists.

 

Most landlord underwriters, will also underwrite homeowners policies. Find out the underwriter and ask them.

 

Ok lets just imagine that the cracks become a major issue, after you have moved into the house, because the neighbour is on a mission. The Insurers send out a loss assessor and the neighbour tells them you knew about the issue. You might think this is one persons word against another persons. But are you willing to take the risk ? Insurers will appoint a company if they have any concerns to question you very closely. It will be very difficult, not to admit that you had some prior knowledge. If you have changed underwriter, you face a nightmare situation. Even with the same underwriter, they might say you failed to advise them when you were first aware. But then you can argue about the 2014 report and no evidence of any subsidence issue.

 

My advice having seen claimants come a cropper in this situation, is to approach it safety first.

 

Priority

 

1) retain buildings cover with the same underwriter so you have continuity of cover.

 

2) speak to the neighbours about the reports and current condition of the party wall they spoke about.

 

3) Depending on what you find out, obtain a structural engineers report.

 

 

You really have to think about the worst case possible, where major underpinning works are required, meaning you need to also claim for alternative accommodation costs. Such claims can run into many tens of thousands. Ok, it might not be as bad as this, but this is the largest possible risk you could face.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...