Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN for parking on pavement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2021 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guys, any help will be appreciated regarding this matter.

I was given ticket for parking wholly on pavement, I parked on same spot previously and it was fine.

The other thing is I'm trade plate driver delivering sain car client before this happened. Can I be able to challenge this ticket given that I'm not the keeper or owner.

 

Many thanks.

pcn.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you were the driver

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

document converted to pdf and rotated

 

what are the restrictions for Tuesday night at 20:30...pixs of signs would be useful but as PDF and ONE multipage file

read UPLOAD

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you were the driver

 

 

? Anyone can appeal a parking ticket. You don't need to be the owner.

 

 

The question is whether there is any realistic chance of winning the appeal. On the fact of it, the PCN was for yellow lines. We would need to know if there were yellow lines on the roadside, and if they were in force at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If no yellow lines they have used the wrong contravention so you win on a technicality. Now in many places parking on the pavemet is an offence in its own right so somehting to think about. The road includes the pavemetn or verge as far as the boundary of the adjoining land so in some instances abandoning your vehicle in a hedge will get you a ticket

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not 100 percent for yellow lines. There are other circumstances in which it could also be the correct contravention.

 

It's no longer relevant that he was on the pavement, beause that's not what he was ticketed for. It just depends what the restriction was on that street. Maybe he'll come back and tell us?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for your comments. I didn't see any sign indicating restrictions, in fact a guard at gate said I could park on pavement like others did because inside car park is for Man United staff only, it was on match day. I've parked on exact location a week ago to watch a match and got no ticket. Seems someone ring council about folks parking there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I send informal appeal can that give me more time if they decline. I'm really struggling financially. If it goes to company I work for they'll pay it and recharge me about £100 including admin fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I send informal appeal can that give me more time if they decline. I'm really struggling financially. If it goes to company I work for they'll pay it and recharge me about £100 including admin fee.

 

 

Yes, they will put it on hold at the reduced rate and if they refuse the appeal, you will normally be allowed two weeks to pay the reduced rate starting from when they sent the letter. Assuming they take two weeks to reply, that's four weeks from when you write to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they will put it on hold at the reduced rate and if they refuse the appeal, you will normally be allowed two weeks to pay the reduced rate starting from when they sent the letter. Assuming they take two weeks to reply, that's four weeks from when you write to them.

 

 

Yes on pavement near double yellow lines, parked there before no problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, the double yellows apply to the pavement as well as the road, and so the contravention is correct - restricted street.

 

 

 

Definitely try an appeal, but brace yourself for it being refused, which is likely. I would just explain what happened like in your post 7 above, and emphasise this was a genuine error - you believed parking was allowed/tolerated on match days. You never know, you might get lucky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, the double yellows apply to the pavement as well as the road, and so the contravention is correct - restricted street.

 

 

 

Definitely try an appeal, but brace yourself for it being refused, which is likely. I would just explain what happened like in your post 7 above, and emphasise this was a genuine error - you believed parking was allowed/tolerated on match days. You never know, you might get lucky.

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...