Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ppi welcome


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2037 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help me please to a massive question ,,I

 

Hi there ,

can anyone help me please on what I should do ,

 

I have had 2 loans from welcome finance in 2003 ,

 

I had 1 in 2004 and also a secured loan in 2005 ,

 

I still owe for the secured and haven’t been in touch with anyone since I received it and then sold my house ,

 

can I and should I claim Ppi ,

 

can any give any answers to this please ,

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

time to send an sar

get all the details

 

then go from there.

 

I would suspect the FSCS will offset the PPI against any debt.

 

funny how you were able to sell the home with a secured loan..was it paid on sale?

 

if so you might be ok.

 

but get all the statements first via sar

don't forget to read all the post in the SAR thread esp as you have obv moved.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They made a mistake I think and there was no equity and they said I could pay them off after the sale of my house ,

 

I have had letters since from hoist stating they want 8000 and that was from the secured loan 2005 ,,the other 3 loans very pretty big and paid off ,

 

I don’t know whether it would benefit me trying to claim back Ppi ,

my friend said they will be different loans and won’t be able to offset but I don’t know whether he sending me down wrong path

 

,is there a chance I can claim on the earlier loans without them offsetting as the debt is now with hoist (Robinson way)?,cheers

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suspect they were all a refinance chain?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the secured was seperate but if it wasn’t does that mean bad news?

I mean I did the Ppi calculator and it said I could be owed 1000,s but scare incase the 8000 secured would go extremely high ?

 

But at the same time would that balance remain the same and the 1000,s go to offset it would be doing me a favour at the same time ,?

 

And also in this ppi claim it’s saying it’s going to FOS,is that good news?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should be getting the data as advised

 

in the meantime read around

use the search CAG box of the top red toolbar

 

welcome PPI

 

or whatever you q is.

 

its better you use the 30days wait for the SAR and get upto speed as there appears to be many q's and surmises you are getting wrong & p'haps worrying about nowt.

 

if they didn't get their money from the charge then that doesn't mean they can now come after you

but depending upon the age of loans [pre 2005 being an important date] they might be able to offset

might be under FSCS rules

might even be deemed as going afte the underwriters rather than welcome

could also be that if a chain were formed, that you can add a 0 to the reclaim figure each time it was refinanced.

 

there are so many variables here that without the data

we cant tell yet.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...