Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • let the ombudsman do their job. you'll win handsdown you dont obv owe OVO p'haps anything at all.  dont worry about Past Due credit or any other DCA ( THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS!) as for you being added to the debt, thats quite OK, you were a resident adult and equally liable under law. once you start getting things moving via the  ombudsman dont forget to get your credit files cleansed of any negative data & seek compensation for distress etc, again the  ombudsman should sort both out for you. as you are now NOT a customer of OVO, there is very very little they can do to you now.  
    • A question - did you use the supermarket or the restaurant? I see the restrictions are different. Sign.pdf
    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
    • Npower and Scottish Power and others have always had regulations that require them to treat customers fairly - the threads here and my experiences demonstrate that those regs are little more than useless.   Even Octopus recently spent month after month saying they needed to increase my monthly payments despite my credit balance slowly going up TWICE I had to reset it online back to prior payment as they unilaterally increased it unilaterally. Raised formal complaint and they than said i was paying too much and reduced the payment, again without my agreement, although that time at least they told me they were doing it.   .. and Octopus has been one of the better ones.    
    • Thank you. You left all your personal details showing on the invoice, but I've removed them. From Googling it seems the free parking is limited to one hour.  You stayed two.  There is no point appealing, you did overstay.  That's apart from the fact the private parking companies are just interested in £££££ and never accept appeals. We have other Iceland cases, Iceland as a company refuse to have these invoices cancelled. So it's up to you. Pay £51 and the matter goes away. Or refuse to pay.  Horizon very rarely do court.  We would support you all the way. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Judgment debts


marserobert
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2031 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Do not understand your question marserobert ?

 

How can a Judgment creditor destroy a Judgment ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still do not understand you...start from the beginning and tell your story.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you destroy a CCJ (Judgment )...please explain

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have the ccj number?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how are they telling you this? not over the phone I hope!! unrecorded

who is the debt collector?

what is the debt?

from when?

why are you asking about it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked the Registry Trust...to see if judgment was ever entered ?

 

https://www.trustonline.org.uk/

 

And if not there check with MCOL...but you would need a claim number to check any status.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have provided me with their final response. From what I have read it looks good. I need to know, if they have destroyed the Judgment can they enforce a missing Judgment?

 

It’s almost like understandable English.

The key being “almost”.

 

Until the OP invests time in telling us the whole story, it will just all be guesswork.

 

Still do not understand you...start from the beginning and tell your story.

 

Precisely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you mean they have destroyed the bit of paper they got from the court?

Well, they could always go online and get another copy for free.

 

It wont mean they cant collect the money from you,

just that of you take the matter back to court they will have to watse about 5 minutes printing another copy.

 

Deal with the problem rather than looking for a technicality to try and avoid the inevitable.

 

Tell us about the debt itself and how it got to this stage and you might get some meaningful help from the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you mean they have destroyed the bit of paper they got from the court?

Well, they could always go online and get another copy for free.

 

Absolutely. Destroying a bit of paper doesn't destroy the CCJ. The bit of paper isn't the CCJ. The CCJ exists in the court record and is enforceable from the court record. Whether any particular bit of paper that was issued at the time still exists is pretty much irrelevant to whether the CCJ can be enforced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

It is difficult to decided how much to disclose, However, the Judgment is 25 years old. They never renewed the Judgment. They tell me the Judgment was destroyed after six years.

 

They tell me that a Judgment remains payable until settled. For me it is essential that I know for certain that they cannot enforce that Judgment.

 

My Credit file has always been free of any judgment debt.

 

Marserobert

Link to post
Share on other sites

stuff 'em ignore them they cant enforce it now

forget about it totally

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully the experts will come along with detailed advice, but my understanding is that after 6 years the CCJ cannot be enforced without the permission of the court and that would only be given in exceptional circumstances. CCJ's can't be 'renewed' after 6 years AFAIK, it's a question of whether the CCJ can be enforced.

 

 

After 25 years that seems highly unlikely, but...

 

 

...could the creditor argue that for the last 25 years you have been hiding your whereabouts to avoid the CCJ being enforced? eg gone abroad to avoid the judgement being enforced?

 

 

… could the creditor argue that you had deliberately hidden your assets for 25 years to impede enforcement of the CCJ?

 

 

… to your knowledge in the last 25 years has the creditor made any attempt to enforce the CCJ, directly or, eg, by an attachment of earnings order? Has any debt collector contacted you trying to collect this debt in the last 25 years?

 

 

 

 

How has this come up now? You said "The debt collector informed that the Solicitor destroyed the Judgment". Can you explain a bit more about what has happened please. Has a debt collector contacted you trying to collect this debt? Acting for who? The original judgement creditor or have they bought the debt?

 

 

 

Surely the CCJ appeared on your credit file for the first 6 years after the CCJ was issued? I don't believe that the CCJ can be put back on your credit file even if the original creditor, or anyone who has bought the debt, does try to enforce it again. I'm not certain of that though, hopefully an expert here can confirm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

It is difficult to decided how much to disclose, However, the Judgment is 25 years old.

 

Marserobert

 

And thats why its been difficult to advise......more chance of snow in hell than being able to renew a 25 year old judgment...they can hound you for ever though.....you just have to ignore them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

easy

block numbers text email etc.

 

 

don't tell me you started letter tennis with them...

 

why did you do that?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres nothing they can do..so what are you losing sleep over?

 

can we see the letters then please?

so we know whats been said?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am considering the FOS or taking the matter to Court. I am losing sleep and losing weight.

 

To take them to the FOS you’d have to show they had treated you unfairly.

To take them to court (at least, successfully!) you’d have to show they have acted unlawfully.

 

It isn’t intrinsically unfair to ask you to settle a CCJ, even an old one.

It isn’t intrinsically unlawful to ask you to settle a CCJ, even an old one.

 

They can ask. You can say “go get the court’s permission to enforce the CCJ or I’m not paying a penny”. Sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...